Cargando…

Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p)

BACKGROUND: Receiving epidural analgesia during labor can possibly have negative consequences for mother and child. Yet, the use of epidural analgesia rapidly increased in the Netherlands over the last decade. Since antenatal plans for labor pain relief have been related to epidural analgesia use du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hulsbosch, Lianne P, Nyklíček, Ivan, Potharst, Eva S, Boekhorst, Myrthe GBM, Pop, Victor JM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03415-8
_version_ 1783613395097878528
author Hulsbosch, Lianne P
Nyklíček, Ivan
Potharst, Eva S
Boekhorst, Myrthe GBM
Pop, Victor JM
author_facet Hulsbosch, Lianne P
Nyklíček, Ivan
Potharst, Eva S
Boekhorst, Myrthe GBM
Pop, Victor JM
author_sort Hulsbosch, Lianne P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Receiving epidural analgesia during labor can possibly have negative consequences for mother and child. Yet, the use of epidural analgesia rapidly increased in the Netherlands over the last decade. Since antenatal plans for labor pain relief have been related to epidural analgesia use during labor, the aim of the current study was to develop a Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p). METHODS: Three focus group interviews were conducted with pregnant women, new mothers and caregivers and 13 candidate items were derived. Psychometric properties were tested with explorative factor analysis in sample I (N = 429) and a subsequent confirmatory factor analysis in a different sample II (N = 432). RESULTS: The explorative factor analysis suggested a two-factor seven-item solution: a ‘women’s perception’ and ‘social environment’ subscale. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed an excellent six-item model fit with appropriate internal consistency. Higher scores on the six-item LPRAQ-p indicate greater willingness for request of pain relief medication during labor. Two-tailed t-tests showed that women with elevated levels of depression and pregnancy-specific distress symptoms, nulliparous women and multiparous women with complications during a previous delivery had greater willingness for request of pain relief medication during labor. Linear regression showed that the most important association with higher scores on the LPRAQ-p were high pregnancy-specific distress symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the LPRAQ-p to be a valid instrument to evaluate attitude towards labor pain relief in pregnant women. High scores on this questionnaire are associated with high levels of pregnancy-specific distress symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7686754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76867542020-11-25 Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p) Hulsbosch, Lianne P Nyklíček, Ivan Potharst, Eva S Boekhorst, Myrthe GBM Pop, Victor JM BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Receiving epidural analgesia during labor can possibly have negative consequences for mother and child. Yet, the use of epidural analgesia rapidly increased in the Netherlands over the last decade. Since antenatal plans for labor pain relief have been related to epidural analgesia use during labor, the aim of the current study was to develop a Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p). METHODS: Three focus group interviews were conducted with pregnant women, new mothers and caregivers and 13 candidate items were derived. Psychometric properties were tested with explorative factor analysis in sample I (N = 429) and a subsequent confirmatory factor analysis in a different sample II (N = 432). RESULTS: The explorative factor analysis suggested a two-factor seven-item solution: a ‘women’s perception’ and ‘social environment’ subscale. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed an excellent six-item model fit with appropriate internal consistency. Higher scores on the six-item LPRAQ-p indicate greater willingness for request of pain relief medication during labor. Two-tailed t-tests showed that women with elevated levels of depression and pregnancy-specific distress symptoms, nulliparous women and multiparous women with complications during a previous delivery had greater willingness for request of pain relief medication during labor. Linear regression showed that the most important association with higher scores on the LPRAQ-p were high pregnancy-specific distress symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the LPRAQ-p to be a valid instrument to evaluate attitude towards labor pain relief in pregnant women. High scores on this questionnaire are associated with high levels of pregnancy-specific distress symptoms. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7686754/ /pubmed/33228637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03415-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hulsbosch, Lianne P
Nyklíček, Ivan
Potharst, Eva S
Boekhorst, Myrthe GBM
Pop, Victor JM
Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p)
title Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p)
title_full Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p)
title_fullStr Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p)
title_full_unstemmed Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p)
title_short Development of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire for pregnant women (LPRAQ-p)
title_sort development of the labor pain relief attitude questionnaire for pregnant women (lpraq-p)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03415-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hulsboschliannep developmentofthelaborpainreliefattitudequestionnaireforpregnantwomenlpraqp
AT nyklicekivan developmentofthelaborpainreliefattitudequestionnaireforpregnantwomenlpraqp
AT potharstevas developmentofthelaborpainreliefattitudequestionnaireforpregnantwomenlpraqp
AT boekhorstmyrthegbm developmentofthelaborpainreliefattitudequestionnaireforpregnantwomenlpraqp
AT popvictorjm developmentofthelaborpainreliefattitudequestionnaireforpregnantwomenlpraqp