Cargando…

Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, national policy initiatives and programmes have been developed to increase physical activity (PA). However, challenges in implementing and translating these policies into effective local-level programmes have persisted, and change in population PA levels has been small. Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: P. Rigby, Benjamin, van der Graaf, Peter, B. Azevedo, Liane, Hayes, Louise, Gardner, Benjamin, J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09847-3
_version_ 1783613399666524160
author P. Rigby, Benjamin
van der Graaf, Peter
B. Azevedo, Liane
Hayes, Louise
Gardner, Benjamin
J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline
author_facet P. Rigby, Benjamin
van der Graaf, Peter
B. Azevedo, Liane
Hayes, Louise
Gardner, Benjamin
J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline
author_sort P. Rigby, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasingly, national policy initiatives and programmes have been developed to increase physical activity (PA). However, challenges in implementing and translating these policies into effective local-level programmes have persisted, and change in population PA levels has been small. This may be due to insufficient attention given to the implementation context, and the limited interactions between local policy-makers, practitioners and researchers. In this paper we use a case study of a cross-sectoral network in Northeast England, to identify the local-level challenges and opportunities for implementing PA policies and programmes, particularly the updated 2019 UK PA guidelines. METHODS: Five focus groups (n = 59) were conducted with practice partners, local policy-makers and researchers during an initial workshop in April 2018. Through facilitated discussion, participants considered regional priorities for research and practice, along with barriers to implementing this agenda and how these may be overcome. During a second workshop in December 2018, overarching findings from workshop one were fedback to a similar group of stakeholders, along with national policy-makers, to stimulate feedback from delegates on experiences that may support the implementation of the UK PA guidelines locally, focusing on specific considerations for research, evidence and knowledge exchange. RESULTS: In workshop one, three overarching themes were developed to capture local challenges and needs: (i) understanding complexity and context; (ii) addressing the knowledge and skills gap; and (iii) mismatched timescales and practices. In workshop two, participants’ implementation plans encompassed: (i) exploring a systems approach to implementation; (ii) adapting policy to context; and (iii) local prioritising. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that academics, practitioners and policy-makers understand the complexities of implementing PA strategies, and the challenges of knowledge exchange. The updated UK PA guidelines policy presented an opportunity for multiple agencies to consider context-specific implementation and address enduring tensions between stakeholders. An organically derived implementation plan that prioritises PA, maps links to relevant local policies and supports a context-appropriate communication strategy, within local policy, practice and research networks, will help address these. We present 10 guiding principles to support transferable knowledge exchange activities within networks to facilitate implementation of national PA policy in local contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09847-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7686773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76867732020-11-25 Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England P. Rigby, Benjamin van der Graaf, Peter B. Azevedo, Liane Hayes, Louise Gardner, Benjamin J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Increasingly, national policy initiatives and programmes have been developed to increase physical activity (PA). However, challenges in implementing and translating these policies into effective local-level programmes have persisted, and change in population PA levels has been small. This may be due to insufficient attention given to the implementation context, and the limited interactions between local policy-makers, practitioners and researchers. In this paper we use a case study of a cross-sectoral network in Northeast England, to identify the local-level challenges and opportunities for implementing PA policies and programmes, particularly the updated 2019 UK PA guidelines. METHODS: Five focus groups (n = 59) were conducted with practice partners, local policy-makers and researchers during an initial workshop in April 2018. Through facilitated discussion, participants considered regional priorities for research and practice, along with barriers to implementing this agenda and how these may be overcome. During a second workshop in December 2018, overarching findings from workshop one were fedback to a similar group of stakeholders, along with national policy-makers, to stimulate feedback from delegates on experiences that may support the implementation of the UK PA guidelines locally, focusing on specific considerations for research, evidence and knowledge exchange. RESULTS: In workshop one, three overarching themes were developed to capture local challenges and needs: (i) understanding complexity and context; (ii) addressing the knowledge and skills gap; and (iii) mismatched timescales and practices. In workshop two, participants’ implementation plans encompassed: (i) exploring a systems approach to implementation; (ii) adapting policy to context; and (iii) local prioritising. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that academics, practitioners and policy-makers understand the complexities of implementing PA strategies, and the challenges of knowledge exchange. The updated UK PA guidelines policy presented an opportunity for multiple agencies to consider context-specific implementation and address enduring tensions between stakeholders. An organically derived implementation plan that prioritises PA, maps links to relevant local policies and supports a context-appropriate communication strategy, within local policy, practice and research networks, will help address these. We present 10 guiding principles to support transferable knowledge exchange activities within networks to facilitate implementation of national PA policy in local contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09847-3. BioMed Central 2020-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7686773/ /pubmed/33228613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09847-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
P. Rigby, Benjamin
van der Graaf, Peter
B. Azevedo, Liane
Hayes, Louise
Gardner, Benjamin
J. Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline
Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England
title Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England
title_full Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England
title_fullStr Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England
title_full_unstemmed Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England
title_short Challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in Northeast England
title_sort challenges, opportunities and solutions for local physical activity stakeholders: an implementation case study from a cross-sectoral physical activity network in northeast england
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33228613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09847-3
work_keys_str_mv AT prigbybenjamin challengesopportunitiesandsolutionsforlocalphysicalactivitystakeholdersanimplementationcasestudyfromacrosssectoralphysicalactivitynetworkinnortheastengland
AT vandergraafpeter challengesopportunitiesandsolutionsforlocalphysicalactivitystakeholdersanimplementationcasestudyfromacrosssectoralphysicalactivitynetworkinnortheastengland
AT bazevedoliane challengesopportunitiesandsolutionsforlocalphysicalactivitystakeholdersanimplementationcasestudyfromacrosssectoralphysicalactivitynetworkinnortheastengland
AT hayeslouise challengesopportunitiesandsolutionsforlocalphysicalactivitystakeholdersanimplementationcasestudyfromacrosssectoralphysicalactivitynetworkinnortheastengland
AT gardnerbenjamin challengesopportunitiesandsolutionsforlocalphysicalactivitystakeholdersanimplementationcasestudyfromacrosssectoralphysicalactivitynetworkinnortheastengland
AT jdoddreynoldscaroline challengesopportunitiesandsolutionsforlocalphysicalactivitystakeholdersanimplementationcasestudyfromacrosssectoralphysicalactivitynetworkinnortheastengland