Cargando…

Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Signature in Gastric Cancer Prognosis Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and SpliceSeq Databases

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that the alternative splicing (AS) signature plays a role in the carcinogenesis and prognosis of various cancers. However, the prognostic role of AS in gastric cancer is not clear and needs to be clarified. MATERIAL/METHODS: To identify the differentially exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Xiaohu, Li, Xianghua, Gu, Yimei, Zhou, Lianbang, Tang, Jingjing, Dai, Xiang, Jiang, Heng, Huang, Yang, Zhang, Yingfeng, Xu, Tongtong, Liu, Zhining, Zhao, Qihong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219199
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.925772
_version_ 1783613447206862848
author Cheng, Xiaohu
Li, Xianghua
Gu, Yimei
Zhou, Lianbang
Tang, Jingjing
Dai, Xiang
Jiang, Heng
Huang, Yang
Zhang, Yingfeng
Xu, Tongtong
Liu, Zhining
Zhao, Qihong
author_facet Cheng, Xiaohu
Li, Xianghua
Gu, Yimei
Zhou, Lianbang
Tang, Jingjing
Dai, Xiang
Jiang, Heng
Huang, Yang
Zhang, Yingfeng
Xu, Tongtong
Liu, Zhining
Zhao, Qihong
author_sort Cheng, Xiaohu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that the alternative splicing (AS) signature plays a role in the carcinogenesis and prognosis of various cancers. However, the prognostic role of AS in gastric cancer is not clear and needs to be clarified. MATERIAL/METHODS: To identify the differentially expressed AS (DEAS) events, we performed a differential expression analysis between normal and tumor tissue. The DEAS event was further applied to construct a prognostic signature by performing univariate Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic value of the AS signature. In addition, the network of the splicing events with splicing factors was constructed using the Cytoscape software. RESULTS: A total of 30 005 alternative splicing (AS) events with 372 patients were retrieved from the SpliceSeq database and TCGA database. By performing differential expression analysis, a total of 419 alternative splicing events were screened out, including 56 upregulated and 363 downregulated. We further constructed an AS-related prognostic signature by conducting a series bioinformatics analyses. Moreover, we identified that the AS signature could serve as an independent predictor for the prognosis of GC. We also found that AS signature had a more robust and precise efficacy for prognostic prediction in GC patients. Interestingly, the areas under 3- and 5-year survival curves are similar, both of which are greater than 1-year survival curve, suggesting that the long-term predictive accuracy of our prognostic model built upon AS signature is superior. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a comprehensive analysis of overall prognostic-associated AS events concerning GC and constructed a prognostic model to predict the long-term prognostic survival outcomes in GC patients. We also developed a network of splicing events with splicing factors to reveal new potential molecular diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for GC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7687027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76870272020-12-03 Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Signature in Gastric Cancer Prognosis Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and SpliceSeq Databases Cheng, Xiaohu Li, Xianghua Gu, Yimei Zhou, Lianbang Tang, Jingjing Dai, Xiang Jiang, Heng Huang, Yang Zhang, Yingfeng Xu, Tongtong Liu, Zhining Zhao, Qihong Med Sci Monit Database Analysis BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that the alternative splicing (AS) signature plays a role in the carcinogenesis and prognosis of various cancers. However, the prognostic role of AS in gastric cancer is not clear and needs to be clarified. MATERIAL/METHODS: To identify the differentially expressed AS (DEAS) events, we performed a differential expression analysis between normal and tumor tissue. The DEAS event was further applied to construct a prognostic signature by performing univariate Cox regression analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis. The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic value of the AS signature. In addition, the network of the splicing events with splicing factors was constructed using the Cytoscape software. RESULTS: A total of 30 005 alternative splicing (AS) events with 372 patients were retrieved from the SpliceSeq database and TCGA database. By performing differential expression analysis, a total of 419 alternative splicing events were screened out, including 56 upregulated and 363 downregulated. We further constructed an AS-related prognostic signature by conducting a series bioinformatics analyses. Moreover, we identified that the AS signature could serve as an independent predictor for the prognosis of GC. We also found that AS signature had a more robust and precise efficacy for prognostic prediction in GC patients. Interestingly, the areas under 3- and 5-year survival curves are similar, both of which are greater than 1-year survival curve, suggesting that the long-term predictive accuracy of our prognostic model built upon AS signature is superior. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a comprehensive analysis of overall prognostic-associated AS events concerning GC and constructed a prognostic model to predict the long-term prognostic survival outcomes in GC patients. We also developed a network of splicing events with splicing factors to reveal new potential molecular diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for GC patients. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7687027/ /pubmed/33219199 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.925772 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2020 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Database Analysis
Cheng, Xiaohu
Li, Xianghua
Gu, Yimei
Zhou, Lianbang
Tang, Jingjing
Dai, Xiang
Jiang, Heng
Huang, Yang
Zhang, Yingfeng
Xu, Tongtong
Liu, Zhining
Zhao, Qihong
Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Signature in Gastric Cancer Prognosis Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and SpliceSeq Databases
title Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Signature in Gastric Cancer Prognosis Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and SpliceSeq Databases
title_full Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Signature in Gastric Cancer Prognosis Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and SpliceSeq Databases
title_fullStr Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Signature in Gastric Cancer Prognosis Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and SpliceSeq Databases
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Signature in Gastric Cancer Prognosis Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and SpliceSeq Databases
title_short Comprehensive Analysis of Alternative Splicing Signature in Gastric Cancer Prognosis Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and SpliceSeq Databases
title_sort comprehensive analysis of alternative splicing signature in gastric cancer prognosis based on the cancer genome atlas (tcga) and spliceseq databases
topic Database Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219199
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.925772
work_keys_str_mv AT chengxiaohu comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT lixianghua comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT guyimei comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT zhoulianbang comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT tangjingjing comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT daixiang comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT jiangheng comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT huangyang comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT zhangyingfeng comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT xutongtong comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT liuzhining comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases
AT zhaoqihong comprehensiveanalysisofalternativesplicingsignatureingastriccancerprognosisbasedonthecancergenomeatlastcgaandspliceseqdatabases