Cargando…

A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case

In this paper, we present a scenario approach and apply it to the Simonshaven case. We offer an outline in which we spell out the core notions of the scenario approach. Next, we give a summing up of criteria to assess and compare scenarios. We use examples of the Simonshaven case to illustrate how t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Koppen, Peter J., Mackor, Anne Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31155856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12429
_version_ 1783613470166482944
author van Koppen, Peter J.
Mackor, Anne Ruth
author_facet van Koppen, Peter J.
Mackor, Anne Ruth
author_sort van Koppen, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description In this paper, we present a scenario approach and apply it to the Simonshaven case. We offer an outline in which we spell out the core notions of the scenario approach. Next, we give a summing up of criteria to assess and compare scenarios. We use examples of the Simonshaven case to illustrate how the scenario‐approach works. The last section contains a discussion of the main strengths and weaknesses of the scenario approach and a brief comparison with argumentation‐based and probabilistic approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7687160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76871602020-12-05 A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case van Koppen, Peter J. Mackor, Anne Ruth Top Cogn Sci Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law Editors: Henry Prakken, Floris Bex and Anne Ruth Mackor In this paper, we present a scenario approach and apply it to the Simonshaven case. We offer an outline in which we spell out the core notions of the scenario approach. Next, we give a summing up of criteria to assess and compare scenarios. We use examples of the Simonshaven case to illustrate how the scenario‐approach works. The last section contains a discussion of the main strengths and weaknesses of the scenario approach and a brief comparison with argumentation‐based and probabilistic approaches. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-02 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7687160/ /pubmed/31155856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12429 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Topics in Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Cognitive Science Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law Editors: Henry Prakken, Floris Bex and Anne Ruth Mackor
van Koppen, Peter J.
Mackor, Anne Ruth
A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case
title A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case
title_full A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case
title_fullStr A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case
title_full_unstemmed A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case
title_short A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case
title_sort scenario approach to the simonshaven case
topic Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law Editors: Henry Prakken, Floris Bex and Anne Ruth Mackor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31155856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12429
work_keys_str_mv AT vankoppenpeterj ascenarioapproachtothesimonshavencase
AT mackoranneruth ascenarioapproachtothesimonshavencase
AT vankoppenpeterj scenarioapproachtothesimonshavencase
AT mackoranneruth scenarioapproachtothesimonshavencase