Cargando…
An Argumentation‐Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case
In an argumentation approach, legal evidential reasoning is modeled as the construction and attack of “trees of inference” from evidence to conclusions by applying generalizations to evidence or intermediate conclusions. In this paper, an argumentation‐based analysis of the Simonshaven case is given...
Autor principal: | Prakken, Henry |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30873711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12418 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case
por: Bex, Floris J.
Publicado: (2019) -
Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities
por: Verheij, Bart
Publicado: (2019) -
A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case
por: van Koppen, Peter J., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Limits of Bayesian Thinking in Court
por: Meester, Ronald
Publicado: (2019) -
Suggestions by the Board of Control
Publicado: (1920)