Cargando…
The Limits of Bayesian Thinking in Court
We comment on the contributions of Dahlman and of Fenton et al., who both suggested a Bayesian approach to analyze the Simonshaven case. We argue that analyzing a full case with a Bayesian approach is not feasible, and that there are serious problems with assigning actual numbers to probabilities an...
Autor principal: | Meester, Ronald |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31670466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12478 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities
por: Verheij, Bart
Publicado: (2019) -
A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case
por: van Koppen, Peter J., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case
por: Bex, Floris J.
Publicado: (2019) -
An Argumentation‐Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case
por: Prakken, Henry
Publicado: (2019) -
Naturalism, tractability and the adaptive toolbox
por: Rich, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)