Cargando…
Quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial
Despite evidence that airborne transmission contributes to influenza epidemics, limited knowledge of the infectiousness of human influenza cases hinders pandemic preparedness. We used airborne viral source strength and indoor CO(2) monitoring from the largest human influenza challenge‐transmission t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.12701 |
_version_ | 1783613496116641792 |
---|---|
author | Bueno de Mesquita, Paul Jacob Noakes, Catherine J. Milton, Donald K. |
author_facet | Bueno de Mesquita, Paul Jacob Noakes, Catherine J. Milton, Donald K. |
author_sort | Bueno de Mesquita, Paul Jacob |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite evidence that airborne transmission contributes to influenza epidemics, limited knowledge of the infectiousness of human influenza cases hinders pandemic preparedness. We used airborne viral source strength and indoor CO(2) monitoring from the largest human influenza challenge‐transmission trial (EMIT: Evaluating Modes of Influenza Transmission, ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01710111) to compute an airborne infectious dose generation rate q = 0.11 (95% CI 0.088, 0.12)/h and calculate the quantity of airborne virus per infectious dose σ = 1.4E + 5 RNA copies/quantum (95% CI 9.9E + 4, 1.8E + 5). We then compared these calculated values to available data on influenza airborne infectious dose from several previous studies, and applied the values to dormitory room environments to predict probability of transmission between roommates. Transmission risk from typical, moderately to severely symptomatic influenza cases is dramatically decreased by exposure reduction via increasing indoor air ventilation. The minority of cases who shed the most virus (ie, supershedders) may pose great risk even in well‐ventilated spaces. Our modeling method and estimated infectiousness provide a ground work for (a) epidemiologic studies of transmission in non‐experimental settings and (b) evaluation of the extent to which airborne exposure control strategies could limit transmission risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7687273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76872732020-12-05 Quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial Bueno de Mesquita, Paul Jacob Noakes, Catherine J. Milton, Donald K. Indoor Air Original Articles Despite evidence that airborne transmission contributes to influenza epidemics, limited knowledge of the infectiousness of human influenza cases hinders pandemic preparedness. We used airborne viral source strength and indoor CO(2) monitoring from the largest human influenza challenge‐transmission trial (EMIT: Evaluating Modes of Influenza Transmission, ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01710111) to compute an airborne infectious dose generation rate q = 0.11 (95% CI 0.088, 0.12)/h and calculate the quantity of airborne virus per infectious dose σ = 1.4E + 5 RNA copies/quantum (95% CI 9.9E + 4, 1.8E + 5). We then compared these calculated values to available data on influenza airborne infectious dose from several previous studies, and applied the values to dormitory room environments to predict probability of transmission between roommates. Transmission risk from typical, moderately to severely symptomatic influenza cases is dramatically decreased by exposure reduction via increasing indoor air ventilation. The minority of cases who shed the most virus (ie, supershedders) may pose great risk even in well‐ventilated spaces. Our modeling method and estimated infectiousness provide a ground work for (a) epidemiologic studies of transmission in non‐experimental settings and (b) evaluation of the extent to which airborne exposure control strategies could limit transmission risk. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-15 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7687273/ /pubmed/32542890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.12701 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Indoor Air published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bueno de Mesquita, Paul Jacob Noakes, Catherine J. Milton, Donald K. Quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial |
title | Quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial |
title_full | Quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial |
title_fullStr | Quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial |
title_short | Quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial |
title_sort | quantitative aerobiologic analysis of an influenza human challenge‐transmission trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.12701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buenodemesquitapauljacob quantitativeaerobiologicanalysisofaninfluenzahumanchallengetransmissiontrial AT noakescatherinej quantitativeaerobiologicanalysisofaninfluenzahumanchallengetransmissiontrial AT miltondonaldk quantitativeaerobiologicanalysisofaninfluenzahumanchallengetransmissiontrial |