Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection
INTRODUCTION: Isolated dissection of visceral artery organs is very infrequently reported and when it occurs it mostly affects the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with abdominal pain as the commonest presenting symptom. However, the best therapeutic strategy in symptomatic patients has not yet been...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294077 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.92403 |
_version_ | 1783613572190830592 |
---|---|
author | Mkangala, Abdala Maulid Liang, Huimin Dong, Xiang-Jun Su, Yangbo HaoHao, Lu |
author_facet | Mkangala, Abdala Maulid Liang, Huimin Dong, Xiang-Jun Su, Yangbo HaoHao, Lu |
author_sort | Mkangala, Abdala Maulid |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Isolated dissection of visceral artery organs is very infrequently reported and when it occurs it mostly affects the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with abdominal pain as the commonest presenting symptom. However, the best therapeutic strategy in symptomatic patients has not yet been established. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed patients who had SISMAD and received conservative, bare stent and coil assisting bare stent as a primary treatment between 2014 and 2018. Patient demographics, symptoms, angiographic findings and treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients was found to have SISMAD among whom 83.9% (n = 52) were male and 16% (n = 10) were female with the mean age of 52.55 ±7.22 years, range 33–77. 22.6% (n = 14) received conservative, 62.9% (n = 39) endovascular bare stent and 14. Four percent (n = 9) endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatment. The success rate in primary treatment was conservative 78.5% (n = 11), bare stent 97.4% (n = 38), coil assisting bare stent 100% (n = 9). The mean follow-up duration (months) was 28.76 ±12.87. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular bare stent placement is a safe, effective, and successful treatment in the management of symptomatic SISMAD. The diagnostic imaging result is a key point for planning appropriate treatment especially in patients with tapered vessels, longer dissection lesion, and dissection aneurysm where coil assisting bare stent shows good results. Conservative treatment should be given priority for the asymptomatic patient, but close monitoring is highly recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7687669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76876692020-12-07 Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection Mkangala, Abdala Maulid Liang, Huimin Dong, Xiang-Jun Su, Yangbo HaoHao, Lu Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Isolated dissection of visceral artery organs is very infrequently reported and when it occurs it mostly affects the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with abdominal pain as the commonest presenting symptom. However, the best therapeutic strategy in symptomatic patients has not yet been established. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed patients who had SISMAD and received conservative, bare stent and coil assisting bare stent as a primary treatment between 2014 and 2018. Patient demographics, symptoms, angiographic findings and treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients was found to have SISMAD among whom 83.9% (n = 52) were male and 16% (n = 10) were female with the mean age of 52.55 ±7.22 years, range 33–77. 22.6% (n = 14) received conservative, 62.9% (n = 39) endovascular bare stent and 14. Four percent (n = 9) endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatment. The success rate in primary treatment was conservative 78.5% (n = 11), bare stent 97.4% (n = 38), coil assisting bare stent 100% (n = 9). The mean follow-up duration (months) was 28.76 ±12.87. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular bare stent placement is a safe, effective, and successful treatment in the management of symptomatic SISMAD. The diagnostic imaging result is a key point for planning appropriate treatment especially in patients with tapered vessels, longer dissection lesion, and dissection aneurysm where coil assisting bare stent shows good results. Conservative treatment should be given priority for the asymptomatic patient, but close monitoring is highly recommended. Termedia Publishing House 2020-01-19 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7687669/ /pubmed/33294077 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.92403 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Fundacja Videochirurgii http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Mkangala, Abdala Maulid Liang, Huimin Dong, Xiang-Jun Su, Yangbo HaoHao, Lu Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection |
title | Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of conservative, endovascular bare stent and endovascular coil assisting bare stent treatments for patients diagnosed with spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294077 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.92403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mkangalaabdalamaulid safetyandefficacyofconservativeendovascularbarestentandendovascularcoilassistingbarestenttreatmentsforpatientsdiagnosedwithspontaneousisolatedsuperiormesentericarterydissection AT lianghuimin safetyandefficacyofconservativeendovascularbarestentandendovascularcoilassistingbarestenttreatmentsforpatientsdiagnosedwithspontaneousisolatedsuperiormesentericarterydissection AT dongxiangjun safetyandefficacyofconservativeendovascularbarestentandendovascularcoilassistingbarestenttreatmentsforpatientsdiagnosedwithspontaneousisolatedsuperiormesentericarterydissection AT suyangbo safetyandefficacyofconservativeendovascularbarestentandendovascularcoilassistingbarestenttreatmentsforpatientsdiagnosedwithspontaneousisolatedsuperiormesentericarterydissection AT haohaolu safetyandefficacyofconservativeendovascularbarestentandendovascularcoilassistingbarestenttreatmentsforpatientsdiagnosedwithspontaneousisolatedsuperiormesentericarterydissection |