Cargando…
Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery (FOCUS (fluoxetine or control under supervision), AFFINITY (the Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recovery) and EFFECTS (Efficacy oF Fluoxetine—a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke)) have been collaboratively designed with the same...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04875-1 |
_version_ | 1783613575226458112 |
---|---|
author | Mead, Gillian Elizabeth Graham, Catriona Billot, Laurent Näsman, Per Lundström, Erik Lewis, Steff Hankey, Graeme J. Hackett, Maree L. Forbes, John Dennis, Martin |
author_facet | Mead, Gillian Elizabeth Graham, Catriona Billot, Laurent Näsman, Per Lundström, Erik Lewis, Steff Hankey, Graeme J. Hackett, Maree L. Forbes, John Dennis, Martin |
author_sort | Mead, Gillian Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery (FOCUS (fluoxetine or control under supervision), AFFINITY (the Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recovery) and EFFECTS (Efficacy oF Fluoxetine—a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke)) have been collaboratively designed with the same basic protocol to facilitate an individual patient data analysis (IPDM). The statistical analysis plan for the three individual trials has already been reported in Trials, including a brief description of the IPDM. In this protocol, we describe in detail how we will perform the IPDM. METHODS/DESIGN: Data from EFFECTS and AFFINITY will be transferred securely to the FOCUS statistician, who will perform a one-stage IPDM and a two-stage IPDM. For the one-stage IPDM, data will be combined into a single data set and the same analyses performed as described for the individual trials. For the two-stage IPDM, the results for the three individual trials will be combined using fixed effects meta-analyses. The primary and secondary outcome domains for the IPDM are the same as for individual trials. We will also perform analyses according to several subgroups including country of recruitment, ethnicity and trial. We will also explore the effects of fluoxetine on our primary and secondary outcomes in subgroups defined by combinations of characteristics. We also describe additional research questions that will be addressed using the combined data set, and published subsequently, including predictors of important post-stroke problems such as seizures, low mood and bone fractures. DISCUSSION: An IPDM of our three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery will allow us to provide the most precise estimates of any risks and benefits of fluoxetine vs placebo, to detect reliably a smaller overall effect size than those detectable by the individual trials, to better determine the effects of fluoxetine vs placebo in subgroups of patients and outcomes and to broaden the generalisability of the results. Also, we may identify differences in treatment effects between studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: FOCUS: ISRCTN ISRCTN83290762. Registered on 23 May 2012. EudraCT 2011-005616-29. Registered on 3 February 2012. AFFINITY: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000774921. Registered on 22 July 2011. EFFECTS: ISRCTN ISRCTN13020412. Registered on 19 December 2014. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02683213. Registered on 2 February 2016. EudraCT 2011-006130-16. Registered on 8 August 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7687683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76876832020-11-30 Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis Mead, Gillian Elizabeth Graham, Catriona Billot, Laurent Näsman, Per Lundström, Erik Lewis, Steff Hankey, Graeme J. Hackett, Maree L. Forbes, John Dennis, Martin Trials Update BACKGROUND: Three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery (FOCUS (fluoxetine or control under supervision), AFFINITY (the Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recovery) and EFFECTS (Efficacy oF Fluoxetine—a randomisEd Controlled Trial in Stroke)) have been collaboratively designed with the same basic protocol to facilitate an individual patient data analysis (IPDM). The statistical analysis plan for the three individual trials has already been reported in Trials, including a brief description of the IPDM. In this protocol, we describe in detail how we will perform the IPDM. METHODS/DESIGN: Data from EFFECTS and AFFINITY will be transferred securely to the FOCUS statistician, who will perform a one-stage IPDM and a two-stage IPDM. For the one-stage IPDM, data will be combined into a single data set and the same analyses performed as described for the individual trials. For the two-stage IPDM, the results for the three individual trials will be combined using fixed effects meta-analyses. The primary and secondary outcome domains for the IPDM are the same as for individual trials. We will also perform analyses according to several subgroups including country of recruitment, ethnicity and trial. We will also explore the effects of fluoxetine on our primary and secondary outcomes in subgroups defined by combinations of characteristics. We also describe additional research questions that will be addressed using the combined data set, and published subsequently, including predictors of important post-stroke problems such as seizures, low mood and bone fractures. DISCUSSION: An IPDM of our three large trials of fluoxetine for stroke recovery will allow us to provide the most precise estimates of any risks and benefits of fluoxetine vs placebo, to detect reliably a smaller overall effect size than those detectable by the individual trials, to better determine the effects of fluoxetine vs placebo in subgroups of patients and outcomes and to broaden the generalisability of the results. Also, we may identify differences in treatment effects between studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: FOCUS: ISRCTN ISRCTN83290762. Registered on 23 May 2012. EudraCT 2011-005616-29. Registered on 3 February 2012. AFFINITY: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000774921. Registered on 22 July 2011. EFFECTS: ISRCTN ISRCTN13020412. Registered on 19 December 2014. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02683213. Registered on 2 February 2016. EudraCT 2011-006130-16. Registered on 8 August 2014. BioMed Central 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7687683/ /pubmed/33239053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04875-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Update Mead, Gillian Elizabeth Graham, Catriona Billot, Laurent Näsman, Per Lundström, Erik Lewis, Steff Hankey, Graeme J. Hackett, Maree L. Forbes, John Dennis, Martin Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis |
title | Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_full | Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_short | Update to the FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis |
title_sort | update to the focus, affinity and effects trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis |
topic | Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04875-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meadgillianelizabeth updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT grahamcatriona updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT billotlaurent updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT nasmanper updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT lundstromerik updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT lewissteff updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT hankeygraemej updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT hackettmareel updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT forbesjohn updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT dennismartin updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis AT updatetothefocusaffinityandeffectstrialsstudyingtheeffectsoffluoxetineinpatientswitharecentstrokestatisticalanalysisplanforthetrialsandfortheindividualpatientdatametaanalysis |