Cargando…

Nextgen Vector Surveillance Tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant

BACKGROUND: Vector surveillance provides critical data for decision-making to ensure that malaria control programmes remain effective and responsive to any threats to a successful control and elimination programme. The quality and quantity of data collected is dependent on the sampling tools and lab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farlow, Robert, Russell, Tanya L., Burkot, Thomas R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03494-0
_version_ 1783613580664373248
author Farlow, Robert
Russell, Tanya L.
Burkot, Thomas R.
author_facet Farlow, Robert
Russell, Tanya L.
Burkot, Thomas R.
author_sort Farlow, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vector surveillance provides critical data for decision-making to ensure that malaria control programmes remain effective and responsive to any threats to a successful control and elimination programme. The quality and quantity of data collected is dependent on the sampling tools and laboratory techniques used which may lack the sensitivity required to collect relevant data for decision-making. Here, 40 vector control experts were interviewed to assess the benefits and limitations of the current vector surveillance tools and techniques. In addition, experts shared ideas on “blue sky” indicators which encompassed ideas for novel methods to monitor presently used indicators, or to measure novel vector behaviours not presently measured. Algorithms for deploying surveillance tools and priorities for understanding vector behaviours are also needed for collecting and interpreting vector data. RESULTS: The available tools for sampling and analysing vectors are often hampered by high labour and resource requirements (human and supplies) coupled with high outlay and operating costs and variable tool performance across species and geographic regions. The next generation of surveillance tools needs to address the limitations of present tools by being more sensitive, specific and less costly to deploy to enable the collection and use of epidemiologically relevant vector data to facilitate more proactive vector control guidance. Ideas and attributes for Target Product Profiles (TPPs) generated from this analysis provide targets for research and funding to develop next generation tools. CONCLUSIONS: More efficient surveillance tools and a more complete understanding of vector behaviours and populations will provide a basis for more cost effective and successful malaria control. Understanding the vectors’ behaviours will allow interventions to be deployed that target vulnerabilities in vector behaviours and thus enable more effective control. Through defining the strengths and weaknesses of the current vector surveillance methods, a foundation and initial framework was provided to define the TPPs for the next generation of vector surveillance methods. The draft TTPs presented here aim to ensure that the next generation tools and technologies are not encumbered by the limitations of present surveillance methods and can be readily deployed in low resource settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7687713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76877132020-11-30 Nextgen Vector Surveillance Tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant Farlow, Robert Russell, Tanya L. Burkot, Thomas R. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Vector surveillance provides critical data for decision-making to ensure that malaria control programmes remain effective and responsive to any threats to a successful control and elimination programme. The quality and quantity of data collected is dependent on the sampling tools and laboratory techniques used which may lack the sensitivity required to collect relevant data for decision-making. Here, 40 vector control experts were interviewed to assess the benefits and limitations of the current vector surveillance tools and techniques. In addition, experts shared ideas on “blue sky” indicators which encompassed ideas for novel methods to monitor presently used indicators, or to measure novel vector behaviours not presently measured. Algorithms for deploying surveillance tools and priorities for understanding vector behaviours are also needed for collecting and interpreting vector data. RESULTS: The available tools for sampling and analysing vectors are often hampered by high labour and resource requirements (human and supplies) coupled with high outlay and operating costs and variable tool performance across species and geographic regions. The next generation of surveillance tools needs to address the limitations of present tools by being more sensitive, specific and less costly to deploy to enable the collection and use of epidemiologically relevant vector data to facilitate more proactive vector control guidance. Ideas and attributes for Target Product Profiles (TPPs) generated from this analysis provide targets for research and funding to develop next generation tools. CONCLUSIONS: More efficient surveillance tools and a more complete understanding of vector behaviours and populations will provide a basis for more cost effective and successful malaria control. Understanding the vectors’ behaviours will allow interventions to be deployed that target vulnerabilities in vector behaviours and thus enable more effective control. Through defining the strengths and weaknesses of the current vector surveillance methods, a foundation and initial framework was provided to define the TPPs for the next generation of vector surveillance methods. The draft TTPs presented here aim to ensure that the next generation tools and technologies are not encumbered by the limitations of present surveillance methods and can be readily deployed in low resource settings. BioMed Central 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7687713/ /pubmed/33239015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03494-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Farlow, Robert
Russell, Tanya L.
Burkot, Thomas R.
Nextgen Vector Surveillance Tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant
title Nextgen Vector Surveillance Tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant
title_full Nextgen Vector Surveillance Tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant
title_fullStr Nextgen Vector Surveillance Tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant
title_full_unstemmed Nextgen Vector Surveillance Tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant
title_short Nextgen Vector Surveillance Tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant
title_sort nextgen vector surveillance tools: sensitive, specific, cost-effective and epidemiologically relevant
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03494-0
work_keys_str_mv AT farlowrobert nextgenvectorsurveillancetoolssensitivespecificcosteffectiveandepidemiologicallyrelevant
AT russelltanyal nextgenvectorsurveillancetoolssensitivespecificcosteffectiveandepidemiologicallyrelevant
AT burkotthomasr nextgenvectorsurveillancetoolssensitivespecificcosteffectiveandepidemiologicallyrelevant