Cargando…
Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion
Myocardial infarction (MI) is a disease of major consequence in the modern world, causing permanent, irreversible damage to the heart. Survivors are at risk for developing further cardiovascular pathologies such as heart failure. Further study of MI injury is crucial to improve the understanding and...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Company of Biologists Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.046565 |
_version_ | 1783613608510357504 |
---|---|
author | De Villiers, Carla Riley, Paul R. |
author_facet | De Villiers, Carla Riley, Paul R. |
author_sort | De Villiers, Carla |
collection | PubMed |
description | Myocardial infarction (MI) is a disease of major consequence in the modern world, causing permanent, irreversible damage to the heart. Survivors are at risk for developing further cardiovascular pathologies such as heart failure. Further study of MI injury is crucial to improve the understanding and treatment of the post-MI heart. The most commonly used model for MI in vivo is surgical ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). There are two predominant approaches: permanent ligation (PL), where the LAD is permanently occluded with a suture, or ischaemia-reperfusion (IR), where the LAD is temporarily occluded before removing the suture to restore blood flow and tissue reperfusion. PL results in the majority of the area at risk becoming infarcted, leading to significant apoptotic cell death and a large scar. Conversely, IR salvages some of the area at risk; thus, the scar is smaller and includes reperfusion injury, an additional, albeit smaller, second wave of necrotic damage. PL may be a more appropriate model choice for studies of heart tissue injury and wound healing, owing to the larger, more consistent infarcts, while IR enables the study of reperfusion injury. Both are clinically relevant, and the choice of model depends upon the precise pre-clinical research questions to be addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7687859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Company of Biologists Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76878592020-11-27 Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion De Villiers, Carla Riley, Paul R. Dis Model Mech Special Article Myocardial infarction (MI) is a disease of major consequence in the modern world, causing permanent, irreversible damage to the heart. Survivors are at risk for developing further cardiovascular pathologies such as heart failure. Further study of MI injury is crucial to improve the understanding and treatment of the post-MI heart. The most commonly used model for MI in vivo is surgical ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). There are two predominant approaches: permanent ligation (PL), where the LAD is permanently occluded with a suture, or ischaemia-reperfusion (IR), where the LAD is temporarily occluded before removing the suture to restore blood flow and tissue reperfusion. PL results in the majority of the area at risk becoming infarcted, leading to significant apoptotic cell death and a large scar. Conversely, IR salvages some of the area at risk; thus, the scar is smaller and includes reperfusion injury, an additional, albeit smaller, second wave of necrotic damage. PL may be a more appropriate model choice for studies of heart tissue injury and wound healing, owing to the larger, more consistent infarcts, while IR enables the study of reperfusion injury. Both are clinically relevant, and the choice of model depends upon the precise pre-clinical research questions to be addressed. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7687859/ /pubmed/33361140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.046565 Text en © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Special Article De Villiers, Carla Riley, Paul R. Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion |
title | Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion |
title_full | Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion |
title_fullStr | Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion |
title_short | Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion |
title_sort | mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion |
topic | Special Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.046565 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devillierscarla mousemodelsofmyocardialinfarctioncomparingpermanentligationandischaemiareperfusion AT rileypaulr mousemodelsofmyocardialinfarctioncomparingpermanentligationandischaemiareperfusion |