Cargando…

Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a disease of major consequence in the modern world, causing permanent, irreversible damage to the heart. Survivors are at risk for developing further cardiovascular pathologies such as heart failure. Further study of MI injury is crucial to improve the understanding and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Villiers, Carla, Riley, Paul R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.046565
_version_ 1783613608510357504
author De Villiers, Carla
Riley, Paul R.
author_facet De Villiers, Carla
Riley, Paul R.
author_sort De Villiers, Carla
collection PubMed
description Myocardial infarction (MI) is a disease of major consequence in the modern world, causing permanent, irreversible damage to the heart. Survivors are at risk for developing further cardiovascular pathologies such as heart failure. Further study of MI injury is crucial to improve the understanding and treatment of the post-MI heart. The most commonly used model for MI in vivo is surgical ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). There are two predominant approaches: permanent ligation (PL), where the LAD is permanently occluded with a suture, or ischaemia-reperfusion (IR), where the LAD is temporarily occluded before removing the suture to restore blood flow and tissue reperfusion. PL results in the majority of the area at risk becoming infarcted, leading to significant apoptotic cell death and a large scar. Conversely, IR salvages some of the area at risk; thus, the scar is smaller and includes reperfusion injury, an additional, albeit smaller, second wave of necrotic damage. PL may be a more appropriate model choice for studies of heart tissue injury and wound healing, owing to the larger, more consistent infarcts, while IR enables the study of reperfusion injury. Both are clinically relevant, and the choice of model depends upon the precise pre-clinical research questions to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7687859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76878592020-11-27 Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion De Villiers, Carla Riley, Paul R. Dis Model Mech Special Article Myocardial infarction (MI) is a disease of major consequence in the modern world, causing permanent, irreversible damage to the heart. Survivors are at risk for developing further cardiovascular pathologies such as heart failure. Further study of MI injury is crucial to improve the understanding and treatment of the post-MI heart. The most commonly used model for MI in vivo is surgical ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). There are two predominant approaches: permanent ligation (PL), where the LAD is permanently occluded with a suture, or ischaemia-reperfusion (IR), where the LAD is temporarily occluded before removing the suture to restore blood flow and tissue reperfusion. PL results in the majority of the area at risk becoming infarcted, leading to significant apoptotic cell death and a large scar. Conversely, IR salvages some of the area at risk; thus, the scar is smaller and includes reperfusion injury, an additional, albeit smaller, second wave of necrotic damage. PL may be a more appropriate model choice for studies of heart tissue injury and wound healing, owing to the larger, more consistent infarcts, while IR enables the study of reperfusion injury. Both are clinically relevant, and the choice of model depends upon the precise pre-clinical research questions to be addressed. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7687859/ /pubmed/33361140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.046565 Text en © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Special Article
De Villiers, Carla
Riley, Paul R.
Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion
title Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion
title_full Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion
title_fullStr Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion
title_full_unstemmed Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion
title_short Mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion
title_sort mouse models of myocardial infarction: comparing permanent ligation and ischaemia-reperfusion
topic Special Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7687859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33361140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.046565
work_keys_str_mv AT devillierscarla mousemodelsofmyocardialinfarctioncomparingpermanentligationandischaemiareperfusion
AT rileypaulr mousemodelsofmyocardialinfarctioncomparingpermanentligationandischaemiareperfusion