Cargando…
Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis
BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, targeting the molecules CTLA-4, PD-1, respectively,have shown efficacy against several types of cancer. Despite these results, only a small percentage of patients maintains a long-lasting effect. Even Ipilimumab, in combination with nivolumab, has demonstrated a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7688006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02588-2 |
_version_ | 1783613625465831424 |
---|---|
author | Marchetti, Paolo Botticelli, Andrea Ascierto, Antonio Paolo Curigliano, Giuseppe Giannarelli, Diana |
author_facet | Marchetti, Paolo Botticelli, Andrea Ascierto, Antonio Paolo Curigliano, Giuseppe Giannarelli, Diana |
author_sort | Marchetti, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, targeting the molecules CTLA-4, PD-1, respectively,have shown efficacy against several types of cancer. Despite these results, only a small percentage of patients maintains a long-lasting effect. Even Ipilimumab, in combination with nivolumab, has demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in multiple tumor types. However, no trial has been designed with the primary endpoint to compare the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined, compared to nivolumab alone. Hence, the added value of ipilimumab in the combination has not clearly been established yet. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of the combination strategy compared to the single agent therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of Phase I-II-III Clinical Trials, published from 2010 up to 2020, in which the combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab was compared to nivolumab alone. We extracted ORR, OS and PFS HR on the basis of treatment from the subgroup analysis of each trial. RESULTS: A total of 7 trials were included in the present meta-analysis. Overall, 1313 patients were treated with the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination compared to 1110 patients treated with nivolumabalone. All trials reported the Objective response rate(ORR), no heterogeneity was found among studies and the pooled Odds Ratio was highly in favor of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination with respect to nivolumab alone (1.683; 95% CI: 1.407–2.012; P < 0.0001). Three studies were considered for Progression free survival (PFS) analysis, and the pooled Hazard Ratio favored the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with respect to nivolumab alone (0.807; 95% CI: 0.719–0.907; P < 0.0001). The Overall survival(OS) endpoint was considered only in 2 trials, and the pooled HR favored, also in this case, the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with respect to nivolumab alone (0.87; 95% CI: 0.763–0.997; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab seems to be superior to nivolumab alone in cancer patients, regardless of histology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7688006 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76880062020-11-30 Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis Marchetti, Paolo Botticelli, Andrea Ascierto, Antonio Paolo Curigliano, Giuseppe Giannarelli, Diana J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, targeting the molecules CTLA-4, PD-1, respectively,have shown efficacy against several types of cancer. Despite these results, only a small percentage of patients maintains a long-lasting effect. Even Ipilimumab, in combination with nivolumab, has demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in multiple tumor types. However, no trial has been designed with the primary endpoint to compare the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined, compared to nivolumab alone. Hence, the added value of ipilimumab in the combination has not clearly been established yet. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of the combination strategy compared to the single agent therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of Phase I-II-III Clinical Trials, published from 2010 up to 2020, in which the combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab was compared to nivolumab alone. We extracted ORR, OS and PFS HR on the basis of treatment from the subgroup analysis of each trial. RESULTS: A total of 7 trials were included in the present meta-analysis. Overall, 1313 patients were treated with the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination compared to 1110 patients treated with nivolumabalone. All trials reported the Objective response rate(ORR), no heterogeneity was found among studies and the pooled Odds Ratio was highly in favor of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination with respect to nivolumab alone (1.683; 95% CI: 1.407–2.012; P < 0.0001). Three studies were considered for Progression free survival (PFS) analysis, and the pooled Hazard Ratio favored the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with respect to nivolumab alone (0.807; 95% CI: 0.719–0.907; P < 0.0001). The Overall survival(OS) endpoint was considered only in 2 trials, and the pooled HR favored, also in this case, the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with respect to nivolumab alone (0.87; 95% CI: 0.763–0.997; P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab seems to be superior to nivolumab alone in cancer patients, regardless of histology. BioMed Central 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7688006/ /pubmed/33239030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02588-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Marchetti, Paolo Botticelli, Andrea Ascierto, Antonio Paolo Curigliano, Giuseppe Giannarelli, Diana Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis |
title | Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis |
title_full | Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis |
title_fullStr | Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis |
title_short | Agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis |
title_sort | agnostic evaluation of ipilimumab and nivolumab association: a metanalysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7688006/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02588-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marchettipaolo agnosticevaluationofipilimumabandnivolumabassociationametanalysis AT botticelliandrea agnosticevaluationofipilimumabandnivolumabassociationametanalysis AT asciertoantoniopaolo agnosticevaluationofipilimumabandnivolumabassociationametanalysis AT curiglianogiuseppe agnosticevaluationofipilimumabandnivolumabassociationametanalysis AT giannarellidiana agnosticevaluationofipilimumabandnivolumabassociationametanalysis |