Cargando…

No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2

COVID-19 is caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which jumped into the human population in late 2019 from a currently uncharacterised animal reservoir. Due to this recent association with humans, SARS-CoV-2 may not yet be fully adapted to its human host. This has led to speculations that SARS-CoV-2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dorp, Lucy, Richard, Damien, Tan, Cedric C. S., Shaw, Liam P., Acman, Mislav, Balloux, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7688939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19818-2
_version_ 1783613758965284864
author van Dorp, Lucy
Richard, Damien
Tan, Cedric C. S.
Shaw, Liam P.
Acman, Mislav
Balloux, François
author_facet van Dorp, Lucy
Richard, Damien
Tan, Cedric C. S.
Shaw, Liam P.
Acman, Mislav
Balloux, François
author_sort van Dorp, Lucy
collection PubMed
description COVID-19 is caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which jumped into the human population in late 2019 from a currently uncharacterised animal reservoir. Due to this recent association with humans, SARS-CoV-2 may not yet be fully adapted to its human host. This has led to speculations that SARS-CoV-2 may be evolving towards higher transmissibility. The most plausible mutations under putative natural selection are those which have emerged repeatedly and independently (homoplasies). Here, we formally test whether any homoplasies observed in SARS-CoV-2 to date are significantly associated with increased viral transmission. To do so, we develop a phylogenetic index to quantify the relative number of descendants in sister clades with and without a specific allele. We apply this index to a curated set of recurrent mutations identified within a dataset of 46,723 SARS-CoV-2 genomes isolated from patients worldwide. We do not identify a single recurrent mutation in this set convincingly associated with increased viral transmission. Instead, recurrent mutations currently in circulation appear to be evolutionary neutral and primarily induced by the human immune system via RNA editing, rather than being signatures of adaptation. At this stage we find no evidence for significantly more transmissible lineages of SARS-CoV-2 due to recurrent mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7688939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76889392020-12-03 No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 van Dorp, Lucy Richard, Damien Tan, Cedric C. S. Shaw, Liam P. Acman, Mislav Balloux, François Nat Commun Article COVID-19 is caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which jumped into the human population in late 2019 from a currently uncharacterised animal reservoir. Due to this recent association with humans, SARS-CoV-2 may not yet be fully adapted to its human host. This has led to speculations that SARS-CoV-2 may be evolving towards higher transmissibility. The most plausible mutations under putative natural selection are those which have emerged repeatedly and independently (homoplasies). Here, we formally test whether any homoplasies observed in SARS-CoV-2 to date are significantly associated with increased viral transmission. To do so, we develop a phylogenetic index to quantify the relative number of descendants in sister clades with and without a specific allele. We apply this index to a curated set of recurrent mutations identified within a dataset of 46,723 SARS-CoV-2 genomes isolated from patients worldwide. We do not identify a single recurrent mutation in this set convincingly associated with increased viral transmission. Instead, recurrent mutations currently in circulation appear to be evolutionary neutral and primarily induced by the human immune system via RNA editing, rather than being signatures of adaptation. At this stage we find no evidence for significantly more transmissible lineages of SARS-CoV-2 due to recurrent mutations. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7688939/ /pubmed/33239633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19818-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
van Dorp, Lucy
Richard, Damien
Tan, Cedric C. S.
Shaw, Liam P.
Acman, Mislav
Balloux, François
No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
title No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
title_full No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
title_short No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
title_sort no evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in sars-cov-2
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7688939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19818-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vandorplucy noevidenceforincreasedtransmissibilityfromrecurrentmutationsinsarscov2
AT richarddamien noevidenceforincreasedtransmissibilityfromrecurrentmutationsinsarscov2
AT tancedriccs noevidenceforincreasedtransmissibilityfromrecurrentmutationsinsarscov2
AT shawliamp noevidenceforincreasedtransmissibilityfromrecurrentmutationsinsarscov2
AT acmanmislav noevidenceforincreasedtransmissibilityfromrecurrentmutationsinsarscov2
AT ballouxfrancois noevidenceforincreasedtransmissibilityfromrecurrentmutationsinsarscov2