Cargando…

Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management

INTRODUCTION: Current diabetes quality measures are agnostic to patient clinical complexity and type of treatment required to achieve it. Our objective was to introduce a patient-centered indicator of appropriate diabetes therapy indicator (ADTI), designed for patients with type 2 diabetes, which is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCoy, Rozalina G, Lipska, Kasia J, Van Houten, Holly K, Shah, Nilay D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001878
_version_ 1783613784611356672
author McCoy, Rozalina G
Lipska, Kasia J
Van Houten, Holly K
Shah, Nilay D
author_facet McCoy, Rozalina G
Lipska, Kasia J
Van Houten, Holly K
Shah, Nilay D
author_sort McCoy, Rozalina G
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current diabetes quality measures are agnostic to patient clinical complexity and type of treatment required to achieve it. Our objective was to introduce a patient-centered indicator of appropriate diabetes therapy indicator (ADTI), designed for patients with type 2 diabetes, which is based on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) but is also contextualized by patient complexity and treatment intensity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A draft indicator was iteratively refined by a multidisciplinary Delphi panel using existing quality measures, guidelines, and published literature. ADTI performance was then assessed using OptumLabs Data Warehouse data for 2015. Included adults (n=206 279) with type 2 diabetes were categorized as clinically complex based on comorbidities, then categorized as treated appropriately, overtreated, or undertreated based on a matrix of clinical complexity, HbA1c level, and medications used. Associations between ADTI and emergency department/hospital visits for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were assessed by calculating event rates for each treatment intensity subset. RESULTS: Overall, 7.4% of patients with type 2 diabetes were overtreated and 21.1% were undertreated. Patients with high complexity were more likely to be overtreated (OR 5.60, 95% CI 5.37 to 5.83) and less likely to be undertreated (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.68) than patients with low complexity. Overtreated patients had higher rates of hypoglycemia than appropriately treated patients (22.0 vs 6.2 per 1000 people/year), whereas undertreated patients had higher rates of hyperglycemia (8.4 vs 1.9 per 1000 people/year). CONCLUSIONS: The ADTI may facilitate timely, patient-centered treatment intensification/deintensification with the goal of achieving safer evidence-based care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76890692020-12-07 Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management McCoy, Rozalina G Lipska, Kasia J Van Houten, Holly K Shah, Nilay D BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Epidemiology/Health services research INTRODUCTION: Current diabetes quality measures are agnostic to patient clinical complexity and type of treatment required to achieve it. Our objective was to introduce a patient-centered indicator of appropriate diabetes therapy indicator (ADTI), designed for patients with type 2 diabetes, which is based on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) but is also contextualized by patient complexity and treatment intensity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A draft indicator was iteratively refined by a multidisciplinary Delphi panel using existing quality measures, guidelines, and published literature. ADTI performance was then assessed using OptumLabs Data Warehouse data for 2015. Included adults (n=206 279) with type 2 diabetes were categorized as clinically complex based on comorbidities, then categorized as treated appropriately, overtreated, or undertreated based on a matrix of clinical complexity, HbA1c level, and medications used. Associations between ADTI and emergency department/hospital visits for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were assessed by calculating event rates for each treatment intensity subset. RESULTS: Overall, 7.4% of patients with type 2 diabetes were overtreated and 21.1% were undertreated. Patients with high complexity were more likely to be overtreated (OR 5.60, 95% CI 5.37 to 5.83) and less likely to be undertreated (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.68) than patients with low complexity. Overtreated patients had higher rates of hypoglycemia than appropriately treated patients (22.0 vs 6.2 per 1000 people/year), whereas undertreated patients had higher rates of hyperglycemia (8.4 vs 1.9 per 1000 people/year). CONCLUSIONS: The ADTI may facilitate timely, patient-centered treatment intensification/deintensification with the goal of achieving safer evidence-based care. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7689069/ /pubmed/33234510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001878 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health services research
McCoy, Rozalina G
Lipska, Kasia J
Van Houten, Holly K
Shah, Nilay D
Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management
title Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management
title_full Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management
title_short Development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management
title_sort development and evaluation of a patient-centered quality indicator for the appropriateness of type 2 diabetes management
topic Epidemiology/Health services research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001878
work_keys_str_mv AT mccoyrozalinag developmentandevaluationofapatientcenteredqualityindicatorfortheappropriatenessoftype2diabetesmanagement
AT lipskakasiaj developmentandevaluationofapatientcenteredqualityindicatorfortheappropriatenessoftype2diabetesmanagement
AT vanhoutenhollyk developmentandevaluationofapatientcenteredqualityindicatorfortheappropriatenessoftype2diabetesmanagement
AT shahnilayd developmentandevaluationofapatientcenteredqualityindicatorfortheappropriatenessoftype2diabetesmanagement