Cargando…
Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
OBJECTIVES: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. SETTING: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988 |
_version_ | 1783613785311805440 |
---|---|
author | Voltz, Raymond Dust, Gloria Schippel, Nicolas Hamacher, Stefanie Payne, Sheila Scholten, Nadine Pfaff, Holger Rietz, Christian Strupp, Julia |
author_facet | Voltz, Raymond Dust, Gloria Schippel, Nicolas Hamacher, Stefanie Payne, Sheila Scholten, Nadine Pfaff, Holger Rietz, Christian Strupp, Julia |
author_sort | Voltz, Raymond |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. SETTING: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. RESULTS: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). CONCLUSIONS: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011925. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7689073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76890732020-12-07 Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey Voltz, Raymond Dust, Gloria Schippel, Nicolas Hamacher, Stefanie Payne, Sheila Scholten, Nadine Pfaff, Holger Rietz, Christian Strupp, Julia BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. SETTING: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. RESULTS: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). CONCLUSIONS: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011925. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7689073/ /pubmed/33234614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Voltz, Raymond Dust, Gloria Schippel, Nicolas Hamacher, Stefanie Payne, Sheila Scholten, Nadine Pfaff, Holger Rietz, Christian Strupp, Julia Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey |
title | Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey |
title_full | Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey |
title_short | Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based plan–do–study–act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voltzraymond improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT dustgloria improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT schippelnicolas improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT hamacherstefanie improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT paynesheila improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT scholtennadine improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT pfaffholger improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT rietzchristian improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT struppjulia improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey AT improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey |