Cargando…

Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. SETTING: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voltz, Raymond, Dust, Gloria, Schippel, Nicolas, Hamacher, Stefanie, Payne, Sheila, Scholten, Nadine, Pfaff, Holger, Rietz, Christian, Strupp, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988
_version_ 1783613785311805440
author Voltz, Raymond
Dust, Gloria
Schippel, Nicolas
Hamacher, Stefanie
Payne, Sheila
Scholten, Nadine
Pfaff, Holger
Rietz, Christian
Strupp, Julia
author_facet Voltz, Raymond
Dust, Gloria
Schippel, Nicolas
Hamacher, Stefanie
Payne, Sheila
Scholten, Nadine
Pfaff, Holger
Rietz, Christian
Strupp, Julia
author_sort Voltz, Raymond
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. SETTING: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. RESULTS: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). CONCLUSIONS: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011925.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76890732020-12-07 Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey Voltz, Raymond Dust, Gloria Schippel, Nicolas Hamacher, Stefanie Payne, Sheila Scholten, Nadine Pfaff, Holger Rietz, Christian Strupp, Julia BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To set up a pragmatic Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle by analysing patient experiences and determinants of satisfaction with care in the last year of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postbereavement survey. SETTING: Regional health services research and development structure representing all health and social care providers involved in the last year of life in Cologne, a city with 1 million inhabitants in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 351 bereaved relatives of adult decedents, representative for age and gender, accidental and suspicious deaths excluded. RESULTS: For the majority (89%) of patients, home was the main place of care during their last year of life. Nevertheless, 91% of patients had at least one hospital admission and 42% died in hospital. Only 60% of informants reported that the decedent had been told that the disease was leading to death. Hospital physicians broke the news most often (58%), with their communication style often (30%) being rated as ‘not sensitive’. Informants indicated highly positive experiences with care provided by hospices (89% ‘good’) and specialist palliative home care teams (87% ‘good’). This proportion dropped to 41% for acute care hospitals, this rating being determined by the feeling of not being treated with respect and dignity (OR=23.80, 95% CI 7.503 to 75.498) and the impression that hospitals did not work well together with other services (OR=8.37, 95% CI 2.141 to 32.71). CONCLUSIONS: Following those data, our regional priority for action now is improvement of care in acute hospitals, with two new projects starting, first, how to recognise and communicate a limited life span, and second, how to improve care during the dying phase. Results and further improvement projects will be discussed in a working group with the city of Cologne, and repeating this survey in 2 years will be able to measure regional achievements. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011925. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7689073/ /pubmed/33234614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Voltz, Raymond
Dust, Gloria
Schippel, Nicolas
Hamacher, Stefanie
Payne, Sheila
Scholten, Nadine
Pfaff, Holger
Rietz, Christian
Strupp, Julia
Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
title Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
title_full Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
title_short Improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
title_sort improving regional care in the last year of life by setting up a pragmatic evidence-based plan–do–study–act cycle: results from a cross-sectional survey
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035988
work_keys_str_mv AT voltzraymond improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT dustgloria improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT schippelnicolas improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT hamacherstefanie improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT paynesheila improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT scholtennadine improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT pfaffholger improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT rietzchristian improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT struppjulia improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey
AT improvingregionalcareinthelastyearoflifebysettingupapragmaticevidencebasedplandostudyactcycleresultsfromacrosssectionalsurvey