Cargando…
Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case
Doctrine of novus actus interveniens (NAI) sometimes plays an important role as a tool of defense in medical negligence suits. It is a Latin phrase which means breakage of the causal chain at some point, relieving the initial wrongdoer. In medical negligence suits, the appearance of an external fact...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281327 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23634 |
_version_ | 1783613794246721536 |
---|---|
author | Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B Giri, Sandeep K Sarma, Bedanta |
author_facet | Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B Giri, Sandeep K Sarma, Bedanta |
author_sort | Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B |
collection | PubMed |
description | Doctrine of novus actus interveniens (NAI) sometimes plays an important role as a tool of defense in medical negligence suits. It is a Latin phrase which means breakage of the causal chain at some point, relieving the initial wrongdoer. In medical negligence suits, the appearance of an external factor or event in the causal chain and the outcome is not directly related to the negligence of the doctor, but for the novel agent; the doctrine of NAI can be applied and the initial wrongdoer, i.e., the treating physician can be exempted. Autopsy of a similar type of case was performed in a tertiary care hospital in the State of Chhattisgarh. The autopsy findings identified a new factor in the form of dereliction in duty by another physician causing breakage of the chain in the current case described. How to cite this article: Dheeraj AB, Giri SK, Sarma B. Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):983–985. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7689111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76891112020-12-03 Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B Giri, Sandeep K Sarma, Bedanta Indian J Crit Care Med Case Report Doctrine of novus actus interveniens (NAI) sometimes plays an important role as a tool of defense in medical negligence suits. It is a Latin phrase which means breakage of the causal chain at some point, relieving the initial wrongdoer. In medical negligence suits, the appearance of an external factor or event in the causal chain and the outcome is not directly related to the negligence of the doctor, but for the novel agent; the doctrine of NAI can be applied and the initial wrongdoer, i.e., the treating physician can be exempted. Autopsy of a similar type of case was performed in a tertiary care hospital in the State of Chhattisgarh. The autopsy findings identified a new factor in the form of dereliction in duty by another physician causing breakage of the chain in the current case described. How to cite this article: Dheeraj AB, Giri SK, Sarma B. Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):983–985. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7689111/ /pubmed/33281327 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23634 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B Giri, Sandeep K Sarma, Bedanta Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case |
title | Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case |
title_full | Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case |
title_fullStr | Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case |
title_full_unstemmed | Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case |
title_short | Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case |
title_sort | doctrine of novus actus interveniens not always a defense: analysis of a case |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281327 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23634 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dheerajabhaykumarb doctrineofnovusactusinterveniensnotalwaysadefenseanalysisofacase AT girisandeepk doctrineofnovusactusinterveniensnotalwaysadefenseanalysisofacase AT sarmabedanta doctrineofnovusactusinterveniensnotalwaysadefenseanalysisofacase |