Cargando…

Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case

Doctrine of novus actus interveniens (NAI) sometimes plays an important role as a tool of defense in medical negligence suits. It is a Latin phrase which means breakage of the causal chain at some point, relieving the initial wrongdoer. In medical negligence suits, the appearance of an external fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B, Giri, Sandeep K, Sarma, Bedanta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281327
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23634
_version_ 1783613794246721536
author Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B
Giri, Sandeep K
Sarma, Bedanta
author_facet Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B
Giri, Sandeep K
Sarma, Bedanta
author_sort Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B
collection PubMed
description Doctrine of novus actus interveniens (NAI) sometimes plays an important role as a tool of defense in medical negligence suits. It is a Latin phrase which means breakage of the causal chain at some point, relieving the initial wrongdoer. In medical negligence suits, the appearance of an external factor or event in the causal chain and the outcome is not directly related to the negligence of the doctor, but for the novel agent; the doctrine of NAI can be applied and the initial wrongdoer, i.e., the treating physician can be exempted. Autopsy of a similar type of case was performed in a tertiary care hospital in the State of Chhattisgarh. The autopsy findings identified a new factor in the form of dereliction in duty by another physician causing breakage of the chain in the current case described. How to cite this article: Dheeraj AB, Giri SK, Sarma B. Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):983–985.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76891112020-12-03 Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B Giri, Sandeep K Sarma, Bedanta Indian J Crit Care Med Case Report Doctrine of novus actus interveniens (NAI) sometimes plays an important role as a tool of defense in medical negligence suits. It is a Latin phrase which means breakage of the causal chain at some point, relieving the initial wrongdoer. In medical negligence suits, the appearance of an external factor or event in the causal chain and the outcome is not directly related to the negligence of the doctor, but for the novel agent; the doctrine of NAI can be applied and the initial wrongdoer, i.e., the treating physician can be exempted. Autopsy of a similar type of case was performed in a tertiary care hospital in the State of Chhattisgarh. The autopsy findings identified a new factor in the form of dereliction in duty by another physician causing breakage of the chain in the current case described. How to cite this article: Dheeraj AB, Giri SK, Sarma B. Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):983–985. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7689111/ /pubmed/33281327 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23634 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Dheeraj, Abhaykumar B
Giri, Sandeep K
Sarma, Bedanta
Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case
title Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case
title_full Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case
title_fullStr Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case
title_full_unstemmed Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case
title_short Doctrine of Novus Actus Interveniens Not Always a Defense: Analysis of a Case
title_sort doctrine of novus actus interveniens not always a defense: analysis of a case
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281327
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23634
work_keys_str_mv AT dheerajabhaykumarb doctrineofnovusactusinterveniensnotalwaysadefenseanalysisofacase
AT girisandeepk doctrineofnovusactusinterveniensnotalwaysadefenseanalysisofacase
AT sarmabedanta doctrineofnovusactusinterveniensnotalwaysadefenseanalysisofacase