Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey

PURPOSE: To examine reliability and validity of a Thai version of the Family Satisfaction with Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU 24) questionnaire and use this survey in intensive care units (ICUs) in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard English FS-ICU questionnaire was translated into the Thai l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn, Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak, Dodek, Peter, Heyland, Daren K, Chanayat, Panida, Inchai, Juthamas, Pothirat, Chaicharn, Liwsrisakun, Chalerm, Bumroongkit, Chaiwat, Deesomchok, Athavuth, Theerakittikul, Theerakorn, Limsukon, Atikun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281320
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23559
_version_ 1783613799443464192
author Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Dodek, Peter
Heyland, Daren K
Chanayat, Panida
Inchai, Juthamas
Pothirat, Chaicharn
Liwsrisakun, Chalerm
Bumroongkit, Chaiwat
Deesomchok, Athavuth
Theerakittikul, Theerakorn
Limsukon, Atikun
author_facet Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Dodek, Peter
Heyland, Daren K
Chanayat, Panida
Inchai, Juthamas
Pothirat, Chaicharn
Liwsrisakun, Chalerm
Bumroongkit, Chaiwat
Deesomchok, Athavuth
Theerakittikul, Theerakorn
Limsukon, Atikun
author_sort Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine reliability and validity of a Thai version of the Family Satisfaction with Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU 24) questionnaire and use this survey in intensive care units (ICUs) in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard English FS-ICU questionnaire was translated into the Thai language using translation and culture adaptation guidelines. After reliability and validity testing, we consecutively surveyed the satisfaction of family members of ICU patients over 1 year. Adult family members of patients admitted to medical or surgical ICUs for 48 hours or more who had visited the patients at least once during the ICU stay were included. RESULTS: In all, 315 (95%) of 332 surveys were returned from family members. Cronbach's α of the Thai FS-ICU 24 questionnaire was 0.95. Factor analysis demonstrated good construct validity. The mean (±SD) of total satisfaction score, overall ICU care subscale, and decision-making subscale were 81.5 ± 14.3, 81.0 ± 15.6, and 82.0 ± 14.0. Items with the lowest scores were the waiting room atmosphere and the frequency of doctors communicating with family members about the patient's condition. The mean total satisfaction score tended to be higher in family members of survivors than in family members of nonsurvivors (81.9 ± 13.8 vs 77.7 ± 16.2, p value = 0.059). The overall satisfaction scores between medial ICU and surgical ICU were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The Thai version of FS-ICU questionnaire was found to have acceptable reliability and validity in a Thai population and can be used to drive improvements in ICU care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.in.th, TCR20160603002 HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Tajarernmuang P, Chittawatanarat K, Dodek P, Heyland DK, Chanayat P, Inchai J, et al. Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):946–954.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76891332020-12-03 Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Dodek, Peter Heyland, Daren K Chanayat, Panida Inchai, Juthamas Pothirat, Chaicharn Liwsrisakun, Chalerm Bumroongkit, Chaiwat Deesomchok, Athavuth Theerakittikul, Theerakorn Limsukon, Atikun Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article PURPOSE: To examine reliability and validity of a Thai version of the Family Satisfaction with Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU 24) questionnaire and use this survey in intensive care units (ICUs) in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard English FS-ICU questionnaire was translated into the Thai language using translation and culture adaptation guidelines. After reliability and validity testing, we consecutively surveyed the satisfaction of family members of ICU patients over 1 year. Adult family members of patients admitted to medical or surgical ICUs for 48 hours or more who had visited the patients at least once during the ICU stay were included. RESULTS: In all, 315 (95%) of 332 surveys were returned from family members. Cronbach's α of the Thai FS-ICU 24 questionnaire was 0.95. Factor analysis demonstrated good construct validity. The mean (±SD) of total satisfaction score, overall ICU care subscale, and decision-making subscale were 81.5 ± 14.3, 81.0 ± 15.6, and 82.0 ± 14.0. Items with the lowest scores were the waiting room atmosphere and the frequency of doctors communicating with family members about the patient's condition. The mean total satisfaction score tended to be higher in family members of survivors than in family members of nonsurvivors (81.9 ± 13.8 vs 77.7 ± 16.2, p value = 0.059). The overall satisfaction scores between medial ICU and surgical ICU were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The Thai version of FS-ICU questionnaire was found to have acceptable reliability and validity in a Thai population and can be used to drive improvements in ICU care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.in.th, TCR20160603002 HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Tajarernmuang P, Chittawatanarat K, Dodek P, Heyland DK, Chanayat P, Inchai J, et al. Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):946–954. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7689133/ /pubmed/33281320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23559 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak
Dodek, Peter
Heyland, Daren K
Chanayat, Panida
Inchai, Juthamas
Pothirat, Chaicharn
Liwsrisakun, Chalerm
Bumroongkit, Chaiwat
Deesomchok, Athavuth
Theerakittikul, Theerakorn
Limsukon, Atikun
Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey
title Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey
title_full Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey
title_short Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey
title_sort validity and reliability of a thai version of family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281320
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23559
work_keys_str_mv AT tajarernmuangpattraporn validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT chittawatanaratkaweesak validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT dodekpeter validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT heylanddarenk validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT chanayatpanida validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT inchaijuthamas validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT pothiratchaicharn validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT liwsrisakunchalerm validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT bumroongkitchaiwat validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT deesomchokathavuth validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT theerakittikultheerakorn validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey
AT limsukonatikun validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey