Cargando…
Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey
PURPOSE: To examine reliability and validity of a Thai version of the Family Satisfaction with Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU 24) questionnaire and use this survey in intensive care units (ICUs) in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard English FS-ICU questionnaire was translated into the Thai l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23559 |
_version_ | 1783613799443464192 |
---|---|
author | Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Dodek, Peter Heyland, Daren K Chanayat, Panida Inchai, Juthamas Pothirat, Chaicharn Liwsrisakun, Chalerm Bumroongkit, Chaiwat Deesomchok, Athavuth Theerakittikul, Theerakorn Limsukon, Atikun |
author_facet | Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Dodek, Peter Heyland, Daren K Chanayat, Panida Inchai, Juthamas Pothirat, Chaicharn Liwsrisakun, Chalerm Bumroongkit, Chaiwat Deesomchok, Athavuth Theerakittikul, Theerakorn Limsukon, Atikun |
author_sort | Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To examine reliability and validity of a Thai version of the Family Satisfaction with Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU 24) questionnaire and use this survey in intensive care units (ICUs) in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard English FS-ICU questionnaire was translated into the Thai language using translation and culture adaptation guidelines. After reliability and validity testing, we consecutively surveyed the satisfaction of family members of ICU patients over 1 year. Adult family members of patients admitted to medical or surgical ICUs for 48 hours or more who had visited the patients at least once during the ICU stay were included. RESULTS: In all, 315 (95%) of 332 surveys were returned from family members. Cronbach's α of the Thai FS-ICU 24 questionnaire was 0.95. Factor analysis demonstrated good construct validity. The mean (±SD) of total satisfaction score, overall ICU care subscale, and decision-making subscale were 81.5 ± 14.3, 81.0 ± 15.6, and 82.0 ± 14.0. Items with the lowest scores were the waiting room atmosphere and the frequency of doctors communicating with family members about the patient's condition. The mean total satisfaction score tended to be higher in family members of survivors than in family members of nonsurvivors (81.9 ± 13.8 vs 77.7 ± 16.2, p value = 0.059). The overall satisfaction scores between medial ICU and surgical ICU were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The Thai version of FS-ICU questionnaire was found to have acceptable reliability and validity in a Thai population and can be used to drive improvements in ICU care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.in.th, TCR20160603002 HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Tajarernmuang P, Chittawatanarat K, Dodek P, Heyland DK, Chanayat P, Inchai J, et al. Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):946–954. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7689133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76891332020-12-03 Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Dodek, Peter Heyland, Daren K Chanayat, Panida Inchai, Juthamas Pothirat, Chaicharn Liwsrisakun, Chalerm Bumroongkit, Chaiwat Deesomchok, Athavuth Theerakittikul, Theerakorn Limsukon, Atikun Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article PURPOSE: To examine reliability and validity of a Thai version of the Family Satisfaction with Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU 24) questionnaire and use this survey in intensive care units (ICUs) in Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard English FS-ICU questionnaire was translated into the Thai language using translation and culture adaptation guidelines. After reliability and validity testing, we consecutively surveyed the satisfaction of family members of ICU patients over 1 year. Adult family members of patients admitted to medical or surgical ICUs for 48 hours or more who had visited the patients at least once during the ICU stay were included. RESULTS: In all, 315 (95%) of 332 surveys were returned from family members. Cronbach's α of the Thai FS-ICU 24 questionnaire was 0.95. Factor analysis demonstrated good construct validity. The mean (±SD) of total satisfaction score, overall ICU care subscale, and decision-making subscale were 81.5 ± 14.3, 81.0 ± 15.6, and 82.0 ± 14.0. Items with the lowest scores were the waiting room atmosphere and the frequency of doctors communicating with family members about the patient's condition. The mean total satisfaction score tended to be higher in family members of survivors than in family members of nonsurvivors (81.9 ± 13.8 vs 77.7 ± 16.2, p value = 0.059). The overall satisfaction scores between medial ICU and surgical ICU were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The Thai version of FS-ICU questionnaire was found to have acceptable reliability and validity in a Thai population and can be used to drive improvements in ICU care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.in.th, TCR20160603002 HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Tajarernmuang P, Chittawatanarat K, Dodek P, Heyland DK, Chanayat P, Inchai J, et al. Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):946–954. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7689133/ /pubmed/33281320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23559 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tajarernmuang, Pattraporn Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak Dodek, Peter Heyland, Daren K Chanayat, Panida Inchai, Juthamas Pothirat, Chaicharn Liwsrisakun, Chalerm Bumroongkit, Chaiwat Deesomchok, Athavuth Theerakittikul, Theerakorn Limsukon, Atikun Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey |
title | Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey |
title_full | Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey |
title_fullStr | Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey |
title_short | Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey |
title_sort | validity and reliability of a thai version of family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit survey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tajarernmuangpattraporn validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT chittawatanaratkaweesak validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT dodekpeter validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT heylanddarenk validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT chanayatpanida validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT inchaijuthamas validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT pothiratchaicharn validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT liwsrisakunchalerm validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT bumroongkitchaiwat validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT deesomchokathavuth validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT theerakittikultheerakorn validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey AT limsukonatikun validityandreliabilityofathaiversionoffamilysatisfactionwithcareintheintensivecareunitsurvey |