Cargando…

Polygenic Risk Score for Early Prediction of Sepsis Risk in the Polytrauma Screening Cohort

BACKGROUND: Increasing genetic variants associated with sepsis have been identified by candidate-gene and genome-wide association studies, but single variants conferred minimal alterations in risk prediction. Our aim is to evaluate whether a weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) that aggregates informa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Hongxiang, Wen, Dalin, Sun, Jianhui, Du, Juan, Qiao, Liang, Zhang, Huacai, Zeng, Ling, Zhang, Lianyang, Jiang, Jianxin, Zhang, Anqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.545564
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Increasing genetic variants associated with sepsis have been identified by candidate-gene and genome-wide association studies, but single variants conferred minimal alterations in risk prediction. Our aim is to evaluate whether a weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) that aggregates information from multiple variants could improve risk discrimination of traumatic sepsis. METHODS: Sixty-four genetic variants potential relating to sepsis were genotyped in Chinese trauma cohort. Genetic variants with mean decrease accuracy (MDA) > 1.0 by random forest algorithms were selected to construct the multilocus wGRS. The area under the curve (AUC) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were adopted to evaluate the discriminatory and reclassification ability of weighted genetic risk score (wGRS). RESULTS: Seventeen variants were extracted to construct the wGRS in 883 trauma patients. The wGRS was significantly associated with sepsis after trauma (OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.53–3.15, P = 2.01 × 10(–5)) after being adjusted by age, sex, and ISS. Patients with higher wGRS have an increasing incidence of traumatic sepsis (P(trend) = 6.81 × 10(–8)), higher SOFA (P(trend) = 5.00 × 10(–3)), and APACHE II score (P(trend) = 1.00 × 10(–3)). The AUC of the risk prediction model incorporating wGRS into the clinical variables was 0.768 (95% CI = 0.739–0.796), with an increase of 3.40% (P = 8.00 × 10(–4)) vs. clinical factor-only model. Furthermore, the NRI increased 25.18% (95% CI = 17.84–32.51%) (P = 6.00 × 10(–5)). CONCLUSION: Our finding indicated that genetic variants could enhance the predictive power of the risk model for sepsis and highlighted the application among trauma patients, suggesting that the sepsis risk assessment model will be a promising screening and prediction tool for the high-risk population.