Cargando…

Geography of COVID-19 in Denmark

Aim: To investigate the COVID-19 situation across geographical areas of Denmark over time. Methods: We used COVID-19 data from the Danish State Serum Institute on national, regional and municipality level. Cumulative number of tests, incidence, hospitalizations and deaths per 100,000 inhabitants wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmager, Therese Lf, Lynge, Elsebeth, Kann, Caroline E, St-Martin, Gry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820975607
_version_ 1783613827870359552
author Holmager, Therese Lf
Lynge, Elsebeth
Kann, Caroline E
St-Martin, Gry
author_facet Holmager, Therese Lf
Lynge, Elsebeth
Kann, Caroline E
St-Martin, Gry
author_sort Holmager, Therese Lf
collection PubMed
description Aim: To investigate the COVID-19 situation across geographical areas of Denmark over time. Methods: We used COVID-19 data from the Danish State Serum Institute on national, regional and municipality level. Cumulative number of tests, incidence, hospitalizations and deaths per 100,000 inhabitants were analysed for the five Danish regions and for all of Denmark. The cumulative number of tested and incidence of COVID-19 per 100,000 was compared for the two municipalities, Lolland and Gentofte. A sensitivity analysis of the COVID-19 indicators on a regional level was performed using number of tested as the denominator. Results: The Capital Region ranked highest on all analysed COVID-19 indicators with 10,849 tested, 365 cases, 63 hospitalized and 18 deaths per 100,000 by 2 June 2020. The three regions in western Denmark all had low levels, while Region Zealand ranked second highest. Despite general low health status in Lolland municipality, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was consistently below that of Gentofte. Sensitivity analysis showed that the Capital Region had the highest number of COVID-19 cases per 100,000 tested, but Region Zealand had a higher number of hospitalized and similar number of deaths per 100,000 tested as the Capital Region over time. Conclusion: COVID-19 had affected eastern Denmark, especially the Capital Region, considerably more than western Denmark. The difference may relate to population density and housing conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76892562020-12-03 Geography of COVID-19 in Denmark Holmager, Therese Lf Lynge, Elsebeth Kann, Caroline E St-Martin, Gry Scand J Public Health Empirical Articles Aim: To investigate the COVID-19 situation across geographical areas of Denmark over time. Methods: We used COVID-19 data from the Danish State Serum Institute on national, regional and municipality level. Cumulative number of tests, incidence, hospitalizations and deaths per 100,000 inhabitants were analysed for the five Danish regions and for all of Denmark. The cumulative number of tested and incidence of COVID-19 per 100,000 was compared for the two municipalities, Lolland and Gentofte. A sensitivity analysis of the COVID-19 indicators on a regional level was performed using number of tested as the denominator. Results: The Capital Region ranked highest on all analysed COVID-19 indicators with 10,849 tested, 365 cases, 63 hospitalized and 18 deaths per 100,000 by 2 June 2020. The three regions in western Denmark all had low levels, while Region Zealand ranked second highest. Despite general low health status in Lolland municipality, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was consistently below that of Gentofte. Sensitivity analysis showed that the Capital Region had the highest number of COVID-19 cases per 100,000 tested, but Region Zealand had a higher number of hospitalized and similar number of deaths per 100,000 tested as the Capital Region over time. Conclusion: COVID-19 had affected eastern Denmark, especially the Capital Region, considerably more than western Denmark. The difference may relate to population density and housing conditions. SAGE Publications 2020-11-25 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7689256/ /pubmed/33234014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820975607 Text en © Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Empirical Articles
Holmager, Therese Lf
Lynge, Elsebeth
Kann, Caroline E
St-Martin, Gry
Geography of COVID-19 in Denmark
title Geography of COVID-19 in Denmark
title_full Geography of COVID-19 in Denmark
title_fullStr Geography of COVID-19 in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Geography of COVID-19 in Denmark
title_short Geography of COVID-19 in Denmark
title_sort geography of covid-19 in denmark
topic Empirical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494820975607
work_keys_str_mv AT holmagerthereself geographyofcovid19indenmark
AT lyngeelsebeth geographyofcovid19indenmark
AT kanncarolinee geographyofcovid19indenmark
AT stmartingry geographyofcovid19indenmark