Cargando…

Genomic profile and immune microenvironment in patients with relapsed stage IA lung adenocarcinoma

Patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), even stage IA, are at substantial risk of relapse and death. We explored the distinct features of molecular alterations and immune-related gene expression in Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 25 relapsed patients compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Lu, Zhang, Jing, Song, Yane, Yang, Guangjian, Xu, Haiyan, Li, Junling, Guo, Lei, Li, Xin, Shi, Xinying, Mao, Beibei, Yang, Ying, Wu, Lijia, Wei, Jiyu, Zhang, Henghui, Ying, Jianming, Wang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100942
Descripción
Sumario:Patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), even stage IA, are at substantial risk of relapse and death. We explored the distinct features of molecular alterations and immune-related gene expression in Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 25 relapsed patients compared with 25 non-relapsed patients through using whole-exome sequencing and an immune oncology panel RNA sequencing platform. Results showed that the chemokine, cytolytic activity and tumour-associated antigen gene signatures exhibited significantly higher expression in non-relapsed tumours from stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) than that in relapsed tumours. Besides, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that the gene signatures of chemokines and tumour-associated antigens were significantly associated with the patients’ disease-free survival (DFS), indicating their prognostic value in early-stage LUAD. Cytolytic activity displayed a similar trend but failed to reach statistical significance. These findings revealed a weakened immune phenotype in relapsed tumours and provide valuable information for improving the treatment management of these high-risk patients. Due to the overall small patient number in this study, these differences should be further validated in a larger cohort.