Cargando…

Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study

BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that polarized training-intensity-distribution (TID) programs could enhance endurance performance. Short-distance triathletes, however, perform most of their competition-specific training around moderate-intensity intervals. There is still a lack of evidence a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Röhrken, Golo, Held, Steffen, Donath, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.534688
_version_ 1783613855538085888
author Röhrken, Golo
Held, Steffen
Donath, Lars
author_facet Röhrken, Golo
Held, Steffen
Donath, Lars
author_sort Röhrken, Golo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that polarized training-intensity-distribution (TID) programs could enhance endurance performance. Short-distance triathletes, however, perform most of their competition-specific training around moderate-intensity intervals. There is still a lack of evidence as to which program is more beneficial during triathlete training. This pilot study examined 6 weeks of training-macrocycle using polarized intensity distribution compared to moderate TID and it’s effects on sub-maximal and maximal performance indices during running and cycling. METHODS: Fifteen moderately trained triathletes were either assigned to an intervention group (INT, n = 7, 2 females/5 males, Age: 29.1 ± 7.6) or a control group (CON, n = 8, 2 females/6 males, Age: 30.3 ± 6.1). We used the minimization method (Strata: gender, age competition times, training volumes) to allocate the groups. The participants underwent incremental cycling and running testings before and after the intervention period to assess performance indices until objective exhaustion. CON employed a moderate TID with either medium-intensity (MIT) or low-intensity training (LIT). INT used polarized training intensity distribution (TID), with either LIT or high-intensity training (HIT). Average training hours and anthropometric data did not indicate any differences between CON and INT during the study period. We applied the polarization index of >2 in INT (2.1 ± 0.4) and <1 in CON (0.9 ± 0.3). RESULTS: Both groups notably improved their lactate threshold 2 (+2.8 ± 5.1 %, p = 0.026) and peak (+5.4 ± 6.2 %, p = 0.002) running performance. We did not observe statistically significant time × group interaction effects in any of the performance outcomes between both groups. CONCLUSION: Polarized TID in moderately trained triathletes did not prove to be superior compared to a more moderate TID. However, more studies in larger and more highly trained subjects are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76893832020-12-04 Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study Röhrken, Golo Held, Steffen Donath, Lars Front Physiol Physiology BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that polarized training-intensity-distribution (TID) programs could enhance endurance performance. Short-distance triathletes, however, perform most of their competition-specific training around moderate-intensity intervals. There is still a lack of evidence as to which program is more beneficial during triathlete training. This pilot study examined 6 weeks of training-macrocycle using polarized intensity distribution compared to moderate TID and it’s effects on sub-maximal and maximal performance indices during running and cycling. METHODS: Fifteen moderately trained triathletes were either assigned to an intervention group (INT, n = 7, 2 females/5 males, Age: 29.1 ± 7.6) or a control group (CON, n = 8, 2 females/6 males, Age: 30.3 ± 6.1). We used the minimization method (Strata: gender, age competition times, training volumes) to allocate the groups. The participants underwent incremental cycling and running testings before and after the intervention period to assess performance indices until objective exhaustion. CON employed a moderate TID with either medium-intensity (MIT) or low-intensity training (LIT). INT used polarized training intensity distribution (TID), with either LIT or high-intensity training (HIT). Average training hours and anthropometric data did not indicate any differences between CON and INT during the study period. We applied the polarization index of >2 in INT (2.1 ± 0.4) and <1 in CON (0.9 ± 0.3). RESULTS: Both groups notably improved their lactate threshold 2 (+2.8 ± 5.1 %, p = 0.026) and peak (+5.4 ± 6.2 %, p = 0.002) running performance. We did not observe statistically significant time × group interaction effects in any of the performance outcomes between both groups. CONCLUSION: Polarized TID in moderately trained triathletes did not prove to be superior compared to a more moderate TID. However, more studies in larger and more highly trained subjects are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7689383/ /pubmed/33281607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.534688 Text en Copyright © 2020 Röhrken, Held and Donath. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Röhrken, Golo
Held, Steffen
Donath, Lars
Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study
title Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study
title_full Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study
title_fullStr Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study
title_full_unstemmed Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study
title_short Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study
title_sort six weeks of polarized versus moderate intensity distribution: a pilot intervention study
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.534688
work_keys_str_mv AT rohrkengolo sixweeksofpolarizedversusmoderateintensitydistributionapilotinterventionstudy
AT heldsteffen sixweeksofpolarizedversusmoderateintensitydistributionapilotinterventionstudy
AT donathlars sixweeksofpolarizedversusmoderateintensitydistributionapilotinterventionstudy