Cargando…
Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study
BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that polarized training-intensity-distribution (TID) programs could enhance endurance performance. Short-distance triathletes, however, perform most of their competition-specific training around moderate-intensity intervals. There is still a lack of evidence a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.534688 |
_version_ | 1783613855538085888 |
---|---|
author | Röhrken, Golo Held, Steffen Donath, Lars |
author_facet | Röhrken, Golo Held, Steffen Donath, Lars |
author_sort | Röhrken, Golo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that polarized training-intensity-distribution (TID) programs could enhance endurance performance. Short-distance triathletes, however, perform most of their competition-specific training around moderate-intensity intervals. There is still a lack of evidence as to which program is more beneficial during triathlete training. This pilot study examined 6 weeks of training-macrocycle using polarized intensity distribution compared to moderate TID and it’s effects on sub-maximal and maximal performance indices during running and cycling. METHODS: Fifteen moderately trained triathletes were either assigned to an intervention group (INT, n = 7, 2 females/5 males, Age: 29.1 ± 7.6) or a control group (CON, n = 8, 2 females/6 males, Age: 30.3 ± 6.1). We used the minimization method (Strata: gender, age competition times, training volumes) to allocate the groups. The participants underwent incremental cycling and running testings before and after the intervention period to assess performance indices until objective exhaustion. CON employed a moderate TID with either medium-intensity (MIT) or low-intensity training (LIT). INT used polarized training intensity distribution (TID), with either LIT or high-intensity training (HIT). Average training hours and anthropometric data did not indicate any differences between CON and INT during the study period. We applied the polarization index of >2 in INT (2.1 ± 0.4) and <1 in CON (0.9 ± 0.3). RESULTS: Both groups notably improved their lactate threshold 2 (+2.8 ± 5.1 %, p = 0.026) and peak (+5.4 ± 6.2 %, p = 0.002) running performance. We did not observe statistically significant time × group interaction effects in any of the performance outcomes between both groups. CONCLUSION: Polarized TID in moderately trained triathletes did not prove to be superior compared to a more moderate TID. However, more studies in larger and more highly trained subjects are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7689383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76893832020-12-04 Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study Röhrken, Golo Held, Steffen Donath, Lars Front Physiol Physiology BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates that polarized training-intensity-distribution (TID) programs could enhance endurance performance. Short-distance triathletes, however, perform most of their competition-specific training around moderate-intensity intervals. There is still a lack of evidence as to which program is more beneficial during triathlete training. This pilot study examined 6 weeks of training-macrocycle using polarized intensity distribution compared to moderate TID and it’s effects on sub-maximal and maximal performance indices during running and cycling. METHODS: Fifteen moderately trained triathletes were either assigned to an intervention group (INT, n = 7, 2 females/5 males, Age: 29.1 ± 7.6) or a control group (CON, n = 8, 2 females/6 males, Age: 30.3 ± 6.1). We used the minimization method (Strata: gender, age competition times, training volumes) to allocate the groups. The participants underwent incremental cycling and running testings before and after the intervention period to assess performance indices until objective exhaustion. CON employed a moderate TID with either medium-intensity (MIT) or low-intensity training (LIT). INT used polarized training intensity distribution (TID), with either LIT or high-intensity training (HIT). Average training hours and anthropometric data did not indicate any differences between CON and INT during the study period. We applied the polarization index of >2 in INT (2.1 ± 0.4) and <1 in CON (0.9 ± 0.3). RESULTS: Both groups notably improved their lactate threshold 2 (+2.8 ± 5.1 %, p = 0.026) and peak (+5.4 ± 6.2 %, p = 0.002) running performance. We did not observe statistically significant time × group interaction effects in any of the performance outcomes between both groups. CONCLUSION: Polarized TID in moderately trained triathletes did not prove to be superior compared to a more moderate TID. However, more studies in larger and more highly trained subjects are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7689383/ /pubmed/33281607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.534688 Text en Copyright © 2020 Röhrken, Held and Donath. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Röhrken, Golo Held, Steffen Donath, Lars Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study |
title | Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study |
title_full | Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study |
title_fullStr | Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study |
title_short | Six Weeks of Polarized Versus Moderate Intensity Distribution: A Pilot Intervention Study |
title_sort | six weeks of polarized versus moderate intensity distribution: a pilot intervention study |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33281607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.534688 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rohrkengolo sixweeksofpolarizedversusmoderateintensitydistributionapilotinterventionstudy AT heldsteffen sixweeksofpolarizedversusmoderateintensitydistributionapilotinterventionstudy AT donathlars sixweeksofpolarizedversusmoderateintensitydistributionapilotinterventionstudy |