Cargando…

Prospective Salmonella Enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, Minnesota 2015–2017

Clusters of Salmonella Enteritidis cases were identified by the Minnesota Department of Health using both pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) single nucleotide polymorphism analysis from 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2017. The median turnaround time for obt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rounds, J. M., Taylor, A. J., Eikmeier, D., Nichols, M. M., Lappi, V., Wirth, S. E., Boxrud, D. J., Smith, K. E., Medus, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001272
_version_ 1783613891870195712
author Rounds, J. M.
Taylor, A. J.
Eikmeier, D.
Nichols, M. M.
Lappi, V.
Wirth, S. E.
Boxrud, D. J.
Smith, K. E.
Medus, C.
author_facet Rounds, J. M.
Taylor, A. J.
Eikmeier, D.
Nichols, M. M.
Lappi, V.
Wirth, S. E.
Boxrud, D. J.
Smith, K. E.
Medus, C.
author_sort Rounds, J. M.
collection PubMed
description Clusters of Salmonella Enteritidis cases were identified by the Minnesota Department of Health using both pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) single nucleotide polymorphism analysis from 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2017. The median turnaround time for obtaining WGS results was 11 days longer than for PFGE (12 vs. 1 day). WGS analysis more than doubled the number of clusters compared to PFGE analysis, but reduced the total number of cases included in clusters by 34%. The median cluster size was two cases for WGS compared to four for PFGE, and the median duration of WGS clusters was 27 days shorter than PFGE clusters. While the percentage of PFGE clusters with a confirmed source (46%) was higher than WGS clusters (32%), a higher percentage of cases in clusters that were confirmed as outbreaks reported the vehicle or exposure of interest for WGS (78%) than PFGE (46%). WGS cluster size was a significant predictor of an outbreak source being confirmed. WGS data have enhanced S. Enteritidis cluster investigations in Minnesota by improving the specificity of cluster case definitions and has become an integral part of the S. Enteritidis surveillance process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76895982020-12-04 Prospective Salmonella Enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, Minnesota 2015–2017 Rounds, J. M. Taylor, A. J. Eikmeier, D. Nichols, M. M. Lappi, V. Wirth, S. E. Boxrud, D. J. Smith, K. E. Medus, C. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Clusters of Salmonella Enteritidis cases were identified by the Minnesota Department of Health using both pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) single nucleotide polymorphism analysis from 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2017. The median turnaround time for obtaining WGS results was 11 days longer than for PFGE (12 vs. 1 day). WGS analysis more than doubled the number of clusters compared to PFGE analysis, but reduced the total number of cases included in clusters by 34%. The median cluster size was two cases for WGS compared to four for PFGE, and the median duration of WGS clusters was 27 days shorter than PFGE clusters. While the percentage of PFGE clusters with a confirmed source (46%) was higher than WGS clusters (32%), a higher percentage of cases in clusters that were confirmed as outbreaks reported the vehicle or exposure of interest for WGS (78%) than PFGE (46%). WGS cluster size was a significant predictor of an outbreak source being confirmed. WGS data have enhanced S. Enteritidis cluster investigations in Minnesota by improving the specificity of cluster case definitions and has become an integral part of the S. Enteritidis surveillance process. Cambridge University Press 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7689598/ /pubmed/32539900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001272 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rounds, J. M.
Taylor, A. J.
Eikmeier, D.
Nichols, M. M.
Lappi, V.
Wirth, S. E.
Boxrud, D. J.
Smith, K. E.
Medus, C.
Prospective Salmonella Enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, Minnesota 2015–2017
title Prospective Salmonella Enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, Minnesota 2015–2017
title_full Prospective Salmonella Enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, Minnesota 2015–2017
title_fullStr Prospective Salmonella Enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, Minnesota 2015–2017
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Salmonella Enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, Minnesota 2015–2017
title_short Prospective Salmonella Enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, Minnesota 2015–2017
title_sort prospective salmonella enteritidis surveillance and outbreak detection using whole genome sequencing, minnesota 2015–2017
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001272
work_keys_str_mv AT roundsjm prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017
AT tayloraj prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017
AT eikmeierd prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017
AT nicholsmm prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017
AT lappiv prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017
AT wirthse prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017
AT boxruddj prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017
AT smithke prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017
AT medusc prospectivesalmonellaenteritidissurveillanceandoutbreakdetectionusingwholegenomesequencingminnesota20152017