Cargando…
Comparison of the M‐Vac(®) Wet‐Vacuum‐Based Collection Method to a Wet‐Swabbing Method for DNA Recovery on Diluted Bloodstained Substrates, ,
A wet‐vacuum‐based collection method with the M‐Vac(®) was compared to a wet‐swabbing collection method by examining the recovery of diluted blood on 22 substrates of varying porosity. The wet‐vacuum method yielded more total nuclear DNA than wet‐swabbing on 18 porous substrates, recovering on avera...
Autores principales: | McLamb, Jessica M., Adams, Lara D., Kavlick, Mark F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14508 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is wet swab superior to dry swab as an intranasal screening test?
por: Hagiya, Hideharu, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Gecko Adhesion on Wet and Dry Patterned Substrates
por: Stark, Alyssa Y., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Wet feet: developing sulfur isotope provenance methods to identify wetland inhabitants
por: Lamb, Angela L., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Balancing the decomposable behavior and wet tensile mechanical property of cellulose-based wet wipe substrates by the aqueous adhesive
por: Yun, Tongtong, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Strong adhesion of wet conducting polymers on diverse substrates
por: Inoue, Akihisa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)