Cargando…

Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks

There is strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the degree to which species share co‐evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions. This implies there should be a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of feedbacks between plants and the soil microbiota they cultivate. However...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wandrag, Elizabeth M., Bates, Sarah E., Barrett, Luke G., Catford, Jane A., Thrall, Peter H., van der Putten, Wim H., Duncan, Richard P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32619298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16768
_version_ 1783613928324988928
author Wandrag, Elizabeth M.
Bates, Sarah E.
Barrett, Luke G.
Catford, Jane A.
Thrall, Peter H.
van der Putten, Wim H.
Duncan, Richard P.
author_facet Wandrag, Elizabeth M.
Bates, Sarah E.
Barrett, Luke G.
Catford, Jane A.
Thrall, Peter H.
van der Putten, Wim H.
Duncan, Richard P.
author_sort Wandrag, Elizabeth M.
collection PubMed
description There is strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the degree to which species share co‐evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions. This implies there should be a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of feedbacks between plants and the soil microbiota they cultivate. However, attempts to identify a phylogenetic signal in plant–soil feedbacks have produced mixed results. Here we clarify how phylogenetic signals could arise in plant–soil feedbacks and use a recent compilation of data from feedback experiments to identify: whether there is a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of plant–soil feedbacks; and whether any signal arises through directional or divergent changes in feedback outcomes with evolutionary time. We find strong evidence for a divergent phylogenetic signal in feedback outcomes. Distantly related plant species show more divergent responses to each other’s soil microbiota compared with closely related plant species. The pattern of divergence implies occasional co‐evolutionary shifts in how plants interact with soil microbiota, with strongly contrasting feedback responses among some plant lineages. Our results highlight that it is difficult to predict feedback outcomes from phylogeny alone, other than to say that more closely related species tend to have more similar responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76897802020-12-05 Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks Wandrag, Elizabeth M. Bates, Sarah E. Barrett, Luke G. Catford, Jane A. Thrall, Peter H. van der Putten, Wim H. Duncan, Richard P. New Phytol Research There is strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the degree to which species share co‐evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions. This implies there should be a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of feedbacks between plants and the soil microbiota they cultivate. However, attempts to identify a phylogenetic signal in plant–soil feedbacks have produced mixed results. Here we clarify how phylogenetic signals could arise in plant–soil feedbacks and use a recent compilation of data from feedback experiments to identify: whether there is a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of plant–soil feedbacks; and whether any signal arises through directional or divergent changes in feedback outcomes with evolutionary time. We find strong evidence for a divergent phylogenetic signal in feedback outcomes. Distantly related plant species show more divergent responses to each other’s soil microbiota compared with closely related plant species. The pattern of divergence implies occasional co‐evolutionary shifts in how plants interact with soil microbiota, with strongly contrasting feedback responses among some plant lineages. Our results highlight that it is difficult to predict feedback outcomes from phylogeny alone, other than to say that more closely related species tend to have more similar responses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-31 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7689780/ /pubmed/32619298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16768 Text en ©2020 The Authors. New Phytologist ©2020 New Phytologist Foundation This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wandrag, Elizabeth M.
Bates, Sarah E.
Barrett, Luke G.
Catford, Jane A.
Thrall, Peter H.
van der Putten, Wim H.
Duncan, Richard P.
Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks
title Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks
title_full Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks
title_fullStr Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks
title_short Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks
title_sort phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32619298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16768
work_keys_str_mv AT wandragelizabethm phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks
AT batessarahe phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks
AT barrettlukeg phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks
AT catfordjanea phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks
AT thrallpeterh phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks
AT vanderputtenwimh phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks
AT duncanrichardp phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks