Cargando…
Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks
There is strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the degree to which species share co‐evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions. This implies there should be a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of feedbacks between plants and the soil microbiota they cultivate. However...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32619298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16768 |
_version_ | 1783613928324988928 |
---|---|
author | Wandrag, Elizabeth M. Bates, Sarah E. Barrett, Luke G. Catford, Jane A. Thrall, Peter H. van der Putten, Wim H. Duncan, Richard P. |
author_facet | Wandrag, Elizabeth M. Bates, Sarah E. Barrett, Luke G. Catford, Jane A. Thrall, Peter H. van der Putten, Wim H. Duncan, Richard P. |
author_sort | Wandrag, Elizabeth M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the degree to which species share co‐evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions. This implies there should be a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of feedbacks between plants and the soil microbiota they cultivate. However, attempts to identify a phylogenetic signal in plant–soil feedbacks have produced mixed results. Here we clarify how phylogenetic signals could arise in plant–soil feedbacks and use a recent compilation of data from feedback experiments to identify: whether there is a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of plant–soil feedbacks; and whether any signal arises through directional or divergent changes in feedback outcomes with evolutionary time. We find strong evidence for a divergent phylogenetic signal in feedback outcomes. Distantly related plant species show more divergent responses to each other’s soil microbiota compared with closely related plant species. The pattern of divergence implies occasional co‐evolutionary shifts in how plants interact with soil microbiota, with strongly contrasting feedback responses among some plant lineages. Our results highlight that it is difficult to predict feedback outcomes from phylogeny alone, other than to say that more closely related species tend to have more similar responses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7689780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76897802020-12-05 Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks Wandrag, Elizabeth M. Bates, Sarah E. Barrett, Luke G. Catford, Jane A. Thrall, Peter H. van der Putten, Wim H. Duncan, Richard P. New Phytol Research There is strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the degree to which species share co‐evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions. This implies there should be a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of feedbacks between plants and the soil microbiota they cultivate. However, attempts to identify a phylogenetic signal in plant–soil feedbacks have produced mixed results. Here we clarify how phylogenetic signals could arise in plant–soil feedbacks and use a recent compilation of data from feedback experiments to identify: whether there is a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of plant–soil feedbacks; and whether any signal arises through directional or divergent changes in feedback outcomes with evolutionary time. We find strong evidence for a divergent phylogenetic signal in feedback outcomes. Distantly related plant species show more divergent responses to each other’s soil microbiota compared with closely related plant species. The pattern of divergence implies occasional co‐evolutionary shifts in how plants interact with soil microbiota, with strongly contrasting feedback responses among some plant lineages. Our results highlight that it is difficult to predict feedback outcomes from phylogeny alone, other than to say that more closely related species tend to have more similar responses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-31 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7689780/ /pubmed/32619298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16768 Text en ©2020 The Authors. New Phytologist ©2020 New Phytologist Foundation This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Wandrag, Elizabeth M. Bates, Sarah E. Barrett, Luke G. Catford, Jane A. Thrall, Peter H. van der Putten, Wim H. Duncan, Richard P. Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks |
title | Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks |
title_full | Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks |
title_fullStr | Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks |
title_full_unstemmed | Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks |
title_short | Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks |
title_sort | phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32619298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wandragelizabethm phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks AT batessarahe phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks AT barrettlukeg phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks AT catfordjanea phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks AT thrallpeterh phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks AT vanderputtenwimh phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks AT duncanrichardp phylogeneticsignalsandpredictabilityinplantsoilfeedbacks |