Cargando…

Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions

[Image: see text] The combination of chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) and low salinity water (LSW) flooding is one of the most attractive enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. While several studies on CEOR have been performed to date, there still exists a lack of mechanistic understanding on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esfandiarian, Ali, Azdarpour, Amin, Santos, Rafael M., Mohammadian, Erfan, Hamidi, Hossein, Sedaghat, Milad, Dehkordi, Parham B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04464
_version_ 1783613955547070464
author Esfandiarian, Ali
Azdarpour, Amin
Santos, Rafael M.
Mohammadian, Erfan
Hamidi, Hossein
Sedaghat, Milad
Dehkordi, Parham B.
author_facet Esfandiarian, Ali
Azdarpour, Amin
Santos, Rafael M.
Mohammadian, Erfan
Hamidi, Hossein
Sedaghat, Milad
Dehkordi, Parham B.
author_sort Esfandiarian, Ali
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The combination of chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) and low salinity water (LSW) flooding is one of the most attractive enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. While several studies on CEOR have been performed to date, there still exists a lack of mechanistic understanding on the synergism between surfactant, alkali and LSW. This synergism, in terms of fluid–fluid interactions, is experimentally investigated in this study, and mechanistic understanding is gained through fluid analysis techniques. Two surfactants, one cationic and one anionic, namely an alkyltrimethylammonium bromide (C(19)TAB) and sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS), were tested, together with NaOH used as the alkali, diluted formation brine used as the LSW, and the crude oil was collected from an Iranian carbonate oil reservoir. Fluids were analyzed using pendant drop method for interfacial tension (IFT) measurement, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for determination of aqueous and oleic phase chemical interaction. The optimum concentration of LSW for IFT reduction was investigated to be 1000 ppm. Additionally, both surfactants reduced IFT significantly, from 28.86 mN/m to well below 0.80 mN/m, but in the presence of optimal alkali concentration the IFT dropped further to below 0.30 mN/m. IFT reduction by alkali was linked to the production of three different types of in situ anionic surfactants, while in the case of anionic and cationic surfactants, saponification reactions and the formation of the C(19)TAOH alcohol, respectively, were linked to IFT reduction. The critical micelle concentration and optimal alkali concentration when using cationic C(19)TAB were significantly lower than with the anionic surfactant; respectively: 335 vs 5000 ppm, and 500 vs 5000 ppm. However, it was found that SDBS was more compatible with NaOH than C(19)TAB, due to occurrence of alkali deposition with the latter beyond the optimal point.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76898962020-11-27 Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions Esfandiarian, Ali Azdarpour, Amin Santos, Rafael M. Mohammadian, Erfan Hamidi, Hossein Sedaghat, Milad Dehkordi, Parham B. ACS Omega [Image: see text] The combination of chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) and low salinity water (LSW) flooding is one of the most attractive enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. While several studies on CEOR have been performed to date, there still exists a lack of mechanistic understanding on the synergism between surfactant, alkali and LSW. This synergism, in terms of fluid–fluid interactions, is experimentally investigated in this study, and mechanistic understanding is gained through fluid analysis techniques. Two surfactants, one cationic and one anionic, namely an alkyltrimethylammonium bromide (C(19)TAB) and sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS), were tested, together with NaOH used as the alkali, diluted formation brine used as the LSW, and the crude oil was collected from an Iranian carbonate oil reservoir. Fluids were analyzed using pendant drop method for interfacial tension (IFT) measurement, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for determination of aqueous and oleic phase chemical interaction. The optimum concentration of LSW for IFT reduction was investigated to be 1000 ppm. Additionally, both surfactants reduced IFT significantly, from 28.86 mN/m to well below 0.80 mN/m, but in the presence of optimal alkali concentration the IFT dropped further to below 0.30 mN/m. IFT reduction by alkali was linked to the production of three different types of in situ anionic surfactants, while in the case of anionic and cationic surfactants, saponification reactions and the formation of the C(19)TAOH alcohol, respectively, were linked to IFT reduction. The critical micelle concentration and optimal alkali concentration when using cationic C(19)TAB were significantly lower than with the anionic surfactant; respectively: 335 vs 5000 ppm, and 500 vs 5000 ppm. However, it was found that SDBS was more compatible with NaOH than C(19)TAB, due to occurrence of alkali deposition with the latter beyond the optimal point. American Chemical Society 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7689896/ /pubmed/33251441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04464 Text en © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.
spellingShingle Esfandiarian, Ali
Azdarpour, Amin
Santos, Rafael M.
Mohammadian, Erfan
Hamidi, Hossein
Sedaghat, Milad
Dehkordi, Parham B.
Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions
title Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions
title_full Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions
title_fullStr Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions
title_full_unstemmed Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions
title_short Mechanistic Investigation of LSW/Surfactant/Alkali Synergism for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Fluid–Fluid Interactions
title_sort mechanistic investigation of lsw/surfactant/alkali synergism for enhanced oil recovery: fluid–fluid interactions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04464
work_keys_str_mv AT esfandiarianali mechanisticinvestigationoflswsurfactantalkalisynergismforenhancedoilrecoveryfluidfluidinteractions
AT azdarpouramin mechanisticinvestigationoflswsurfactantalkalisynergismforenhancedoilrecoveryfluidfluidinteractions
AT santosrafaelm mechanisticinvestigationoflswsurfactantalkalisynergismforenhancedoilrecoveryfluidfluidinteractions
AT mohammadianerfan mechanisticinvestigationoflswsurfactantalkalisynergismforenhancedoilrecoveryfluidfluidinteractions
AT hamidihossein mechanisticinvestigationoflswsurfactantalkalisynergismforenhancedoilrecoveryfluidfluidinteractions
AT sedaghatmilad mechanisticinvestigationoflswsurfactantalkalisynergismforenhancedoilrecoveryfluidfluidinteractions
AT dehkordiparhamb mechanisticinvestigationoflswsurfactantalkalisynergismforenhancedoilrecoveryfluidfluidinteractions