Cargando…

Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) with and without concomitant clobazam (CLB) was evaluated in stratified analyses of four large randomized controlled trials, two in Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome, and two in Dravet syndrome. METHODS: Each trial of CBD (Epidiolex(®) in the US; Epidyolex(®) in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devinsky, Orrin, Thiele, Elizabeth A, Wright, Stephen, Checketts, Daniel, Morrison, Gilmour, Dunayevich, Eduardo, Knappertz, Volker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13305
_version_ 1783613956262199296
author Devinsky, Orrin
Thiele, Elizabeth A
Wright, Stephen
Checketts, Daniel
Morrison, Gilmour
Dunayevich, Eduardo
Knappertz, Volker
author_facet Devinsky, Orrin
Thiele, Elizabeth A
Wright, Stephen
Checketts, Daniel
Morrison, Gilmour
Dunayevich, Eduardo
Knappertz, Volker
author_sort Devinsky, Orrin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) with and without concomitant clobazam (CLB) was evaluated in stratified analyses of four large randomized controlled trials, two in Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome, and two in Dravet syndrome. METHODS: Each trial of CBD (Epidiolex(®) in the US; Epidyolex(®) in the EU; 10 and 20 mg/kg/day) was evaluated by CLB use. The treatment ratio was analyzed using negative binomial regression for changes in seizure frequency and logistic regression for the 50% responder rate, where the principle analysis combined both indications and CBD doses in a stratified meta‐analysis. Pharmacokinetic data were examined for an exposure/response relationship based on CLB presence/absence. Safety data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The meta‐analysis favored CBD vs. placebo regardless of CLB use. The treatment ratio (95% CI) of CBD over placebo for the average reduction in seizure frequency was 0.59 (0.52, 0.68; P < .0001) with CLB and 0.85 (0.73, 0.98; P = .0226) without CLB, and the 50% responder rate odds ratio (95% CI) was 2.51 (1.69, 3.71; P < .0001) with CLB and 2.40 (1.38, 4.16; P = .0020) without CLB. Adverse events (AEs) related to somnolence, rash, pneumonia, or aggression were more common in patients with concomitant CLB. There was a significant exposure/response relationship for CBD and its active metabolite. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate CBD is efficacious with and without CLB, but do not exclude the possibility of a synergistic effect associated with the combination of agents. The safety and tolerability profile of CBD without CLB show a lower rate of certain AEs than with CLB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76898992020-12-08 Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials Devinsky, Orrin Thiele, Elizabeth A Wright, Stephen Checketts, Daniel Morrison, Gilmour Dunayevich, Eduardo Knappertz, Volker Acta Neurol Scand Original Article OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) with and without concomitant clobazam (CLB) was evaluated in stratified analyses of four large randomized controlled trials, two in Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome, and two in Dravet syndrome. METHODS: Each trial of CBD (Epidiolex(®) in the US; Epidyolex(®) in the EU; 10 and 20 mg/kg/day) was evaluated by CLB use. The treatment ratio was analyzed using negative binomial regression for changes in seizure frequency and logistic regression for the 50% responder rate, where the principle analysis combined both indications and CBD doses in a stratified meta‐analysis. Pharmacokinetic data were examined for an exposure/response relationship based on CLB presence/absence. Safety data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The meta‐analysis favored CBD vs. placebo regardless of CLB use. The treatment ratio (95% CI) of CBD over placebo for the average reduction in seizure frequency was 0.59 (0.52, 0.68; P < .0001) with CLB and 0.85 (0.73, 0.98; P = .0226) without CLB, and the 50% responder rate odds ratio (95% CI) was 2.51 (1.69, 3.71; P < .0001) with CLB and 2.40 (1.38, 4.16; P = .0020) without CLB. Adverse events (AEs) related to somnolence, rash, pneumonia, or aggression were more common in patients with concomitant CLB. There was a significant exposure/response relationship for CBD and its active metabolite. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate CBD is efficacious with and without CLB, but do not exclude the possibility of a synergistic effect associated with the combination of agents. The safety and tolerability profile of CBD without CLB show a lower rate of certain AEs than with CLB. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-17 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7689899/ /pubmed/32592183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13305 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Devinsky, Orrin
Thiele, Elizabeth A
Wright, Stephen
Checketts, Daniel
Morrison, Gilmour
Dunayevich, Eduardo
Knappertz, Volker
Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials
title Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials
title_full Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials
title_short Cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: Meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials
title_sort cannabidiol efficacy independent of clobazam: meta‐analysis of four randomized controlled trials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32592183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13305
work_keys_str_mv AT devinskyorrin cannabidiolefficacyindependentofclobazammetaanalysisoffourrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT thieleelizabetha cannabidiolefficacyindependentofclobazammetaanalysisoffourrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wrightstephen cannabidiolefficacyindependentofclobazammetaanalysisoffourrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT checkettsdaniel cannabidiolefficacyindependentofclobazammetaanalysisoffourrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT morrisongilmour cannabidiolefficacyindependentofclobazammetaanalysisoffourrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dunayevicheduardo cannabidiolefficacyindependentofclobazammetaanalysisoffourrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT knappertzvolker cannabidiolefficacyindependentofclobazammetaanalysisoffourrandomizedcontrolledtrials