Cargando…

A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale

Certain population groups are known to have higher than average anal cancer risk, namely persons living with HIV (PLHIV), men who have sex with men (MSM), women diagnosed with human papillomavirus (HPV)‐related gynecological precancerous lesions or cancer, solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clifford, Gary M., Georges, Damien, Shiels, Meredith S., Engels, Eric A., Albuquerque, Andreia, Poynten, Isobel Mary, de Pokomandy, Alexandra, Easson, Alexandra M., Stier, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32621759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33185
_version_ 1783613958644563968
author Clifford, Gary M.
Georges, Damien
Shiels, Meredith S.
Engels, Eric A.
Albuquerque, Andreia
Poynten, Isobel Mary
de Pokomandy, Alexandra
Easson, Alexandra M.
Stier, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Clifford, Gary M.
Georges, Damien
Shiels, Meredith S.
Engels, Eric A.
Albuquerque, Andreia
Poynten, Isobel Mary
de Pokomandy, Alexandra
Easson, Alexandra M.
Stier, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Clifford, Gary M.
collection PubMed
description Certain population groups are known to have higher than average anal cancer risk, namely persons living with HIV (PLHIV), men who have sex with men (MSM), women diagnosed with human papillomavirus (HPV)‐related gynecological precancerous lesions or cancer, solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) and patients with autoimmune diseases. Our aim was to provide robust and comparable estimates of anal cancer burden across these groups. Summary incidence rates (IRs), as cases per 100 000 person‐years (py), were calculated by fixed‐effects meta‐analysis. IRs were 85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 82‐89) for HIV‐positive MSM (n = 7 studies; 2 229 234 py), 32 (95% CI = 30‐35) for non‐MSM male PLHIV (n = 5; 1626 448 py) and 22 (95% CI = 19‐24) for female PLHIV (n = 6; 1 472 123 py), with strong variation by age (eg, from 16.8 < 30 years to 107.5 ≥ 60 years for HIV‐positive MSM). IR was 19 (95% CI = 10‐36) in HIV‐negative MSM (n = 2; 48 135 py). Anal cancer IRs were much higher after diagnosis of vulvar (IR = 48 [95% CI = 38‐61]; n = 4; 145 147 py) than cervical (9 [95% CI = 8‐12]; n = 4; 779 098 py) or vaginal (IR = 10 [95% CI = 3‐30]; n = 4; 32 671) cancer, with equivalent disparity after respective precancerous lesions. IR was 13 (95% CI = 12‐15) in SOTRs (n = 5; 1 946 206 py), reaching 24.5 and 49.6 for males and females >10 years after transplant. Anal cancer IRs were 10 (95% CI = 5‐19), 6 (95% CI = 3‐11) and 3 (95% CI = 2‐4) for systemic lupus erythematosus, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. In conclusion, a unifying anal cancer risk scale, based upon comprehensive meta‐analysis, can improve prioritization and standardization in anal cancer prevention/research initiatives, which are in their public health infancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7689909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76899092020-12-08 A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale Clifford, Gary M. Georges, Damien Shiels, Meredith S. Engels, Eric A. Albuquerque, Andreia Poynten, Isobel Mary de Pokomandy, Alexandra Easson, Alexandra M. Stier, Elizabeth A. Int J Cancer Cancer Epidemiology Certain population groups are known to have higher than average anal cancer risk, namely persons living with HIV (PLHIV), men who have sex with men (MSM), women diagnosed with human papillomavirus (HPV)‐related gynecological precancerous lesions or cancer, solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) and patients with autoimmune diseases. Our aim was to provide robust and comparable estimates of anal cancer burden across these groups. Summary incidence rates (IRs), as cases per 100 000 person‐years (py), were calculated by fixed‐effects meta‐analysis. IRs were 85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 82‐89) for HIV‐positive MSM (n = 7 studies; 2 229 234 py), 32 (95% CI = 30‐35) for non‐MSM male PLHIV (n = 5; 1626 448 py) and 22 (95% CI = 19‐24) for female PLHIV (n = 6; 1 472 123 py), with strong variation by age (eg, from 16.8 < 30 years to 107.5 ≥ 60 years for HIV‐positive MSM). IR was 19 (95% CI = 10‐36) in HIV‐negative MSM (n = 2; 48 135 py). Anal cancer IRs were much higher after diagnosis of vulvar (IR = 48 [95% CI = 38‐61]; n = 4; 145 147 py) than cervical (9 [95% CI = 8‐12]; n = 4; 779 098 py) or vaginal (IR = 10 [95% CI = 3‐30]; n = 4; 32 671) cancer, with equivalent disparity after respective precancerous lesions. IR was 13 (95% CI = 12‐15) in SOTRs (n = 5; 1 946 206 py), reaching 24.5 and 49.6 for males and females >10 years after transplant. Anal cancer IRs were 10 (95% CI = 5‐19), 6 (95% CI = 3‐11) and 3 (95% CI = 2‐4) for systemic lupus erythematosus, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. In conclusion, a unifying anal cancer risk scale, based upon comprehensive meta‐analysis, can improve prioritization and standardization in anal cancer prevention/research initiatives, which are in their public health infancy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-07-29 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7689909/ /pubmed/32621759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33185 Text en © 2020 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO); licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Union for International Cancer Control. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Cancer Epidemiology
Clifford, Gary M.
Georges, Damien
Shiels, Meredith S.
Engels, Eric A.
Albuquerque, Andreia
Poynten, Isobel Mary
de Pokomandy, Alexandra
Easson, Alexandra M.
Stier, Elizabeth A.
A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
title A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
title_full A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
title_fullStr A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
title_full_unstemmed A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
title_short A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
title_sort meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
topic Cancer Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7689909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32621759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33185
work_keys_str_mv AT cliffordgarym ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT georgesdamien ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT shielsmerediths ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT engelserica ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT albuquerqueandreia ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT poyntenisobelmary ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT depokomandyalexandra ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT eassonalexandram ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT stierelizabetha ametaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT cliffordgarym metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT georgesdamien metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT shielsmerediths metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT engelserica metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT albuquerqueandreia metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT poyntenisobelmary metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT depokomandyalexandra metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT eassonalexandram metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale
AT stierelizabetha metaanalysisofanalcancerincidencebyriskgrouptowardaunifiedanalcancerriskscale