Cargando…

The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease

The complement cascade is a critical effector mechanism of the innate immune system that contributes to the rapid clearance of pathogens and dead or dying cells, as well as contributing to the extent and limit of the inflammatory immune response. In addition, some of the early components of this cas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schartz, Nicole D., Tenner, Andrea J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7690210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-02024-8
_version_ 1783614023018741760
author Schartz, Nicole D.
Tenner, Andrea J.
author_facet Schartz, Nicole D.
Tenner, Andrea J.
author_sort Schartz, Nicole D.
collection PubMed
description The complement cascade is a critical effector mechanism of the innate immune system that contributes to the rapid clearance of pathogens and dead or dying cells, as well as contributing to the extent and limit of the inflammatory immune response. In addition, some of the early components of this cascade have been clearly shown to play a beneficial role in synapse elimination during the development of the nervous system, although excessive complement-mediated synaptic pruning in the adult or injured brain may be detrimental in multiple neurogenerative disorders. While many of these later studies have been in mouse models, observations consistent with this notion have been reported in human postmortem examination of brain tissue. Increasing awareness of distinct roles of C1q, the initial recognition component of the classical complement pathway, that are independent of the rest of the complement cascade, as well as the relationship with other signaling pathways of inflammation (in the periphery as well as the central nervous system), highlights the need for a thorough understanding of these molecular entities and pathways to facilitate successful therapeutic design, including target identification, disease stage for treatment, and delivery in specific neurologic disorders. Here, we review the evidence for both beneficial and detrimental effects of complement components and activation products in multiple neurodegenerative disorders. Evidence for requisite co-factors for the diverse consequences are reviewed, as well as the recent studies that support the possibility of successful pharmacological approaches to suppress excessive and detrimental complement-mediated chronic inflammation, while preserving beneficial effects of complement components, to slow the progression of neurodegenerative disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7690210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76902102020-11-30 The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease Schartz, Nicole D. Tenner, Andrea J. J Neuroinflammation Review The complement cascade is a critical effector mechanism of the innate immune system that contributes to the rapid clearance of pathogens and dead or dying cells, as well as contributing to the extent and limit of the inflammatory immune response. In addition, some of the early components of this cascade have been clearly shown to play a beneficial role in synapse elimination during the development of the nervous system, although excessive complement-mediated synaptic pruning in the adult or injured brain may be detrimental in multiple neurogenerative disorders. While many of these later studies have been in mouse models, observations consistent with this notion have been reported in human postmortem examination of brain tissue. Increasing awareness of distinct roles of C1q, the initial recognition component of the classical complement pathway, that are independent of the rest of the complement cascade, as well as the relationship with other signaling pathways of inflammation (in the periphery as well as the central nervous system), highlights the need for a thorough understanding of these molecular entities and pathways to facilitate successful therapeutic design, including target identification, disease stage for treatment, and delivery in specific neurologic disorders. Here, we review the evidence for both beneficial and detrimental effects of complement components and activation products in multiple neurodegenerative disorders. Evidence for requisite co-factors for the diverse consequences are reviewed, as well as the recent studies that support the possibility of successful pharmacological approaches to suppress excessive and detrimental complement-mediated chronic inflammation, while preserving beneficial effects of complement components, to slow the progression of neurodegenerative disease. BioMed Central 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7690210/ /pubmed/33239010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-02024-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Schartz, Nicole D.
Tenner, Andrea J.
The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
title The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
title_full The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
title_fullStr The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
title_full_unstemmed The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
title_short The good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
title_sort good, the bad, and the opportunities of the complement system in neurodegenerative disease
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7690210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-02024-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schartznicoled thegoodthebadandtheopportunitiesofthecomplementsysteminneurodegenerativedisease
AT tennerandreaj thegoodthebadandtheopportunitiesofthecomplementsysteminneurodegenerativedisease
AT schartznicoled goodthebadandtheopportunitiesofthecomplementsysteminneurodegenerativedisease
AT tennerandreaj goodthebadandtheopportunitiesofthecomplementsysteminneurodegenerativedisease