Cargando…
Clinical Impact of Combined Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
The prognostic impact of the combination of the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of this combination as a predictor of survival in CRC patients. We retrospectivel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7690417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110859 |
_version_ | 1783614063334391808 |
---|---|
author | Son, Woosung Shin, Su-Jin Park, Su Hyeong Lee, Soo Kyung Park, Eun Jung Baik, Seung Hyuk Lee, Kang Young Kang, Jeonghyun |
author_facet | Son, Woosung Shin, Su-Jin Park, Su Hyeong Lee, Soo Kyung Park, Eun Jung Baik, Seung Hyuk Lee, Kang Young Kang, Jeonghyun |
author_sort | Son, Woosung |
collection | PubMed |
description | The prognostic impact of the combination of the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of this combination as a predictor of survival in CRC patients. We retrospectively evaluated 769 CRC patients who had undergone surgery between January 2006 and March 2014. The CAR and mGPS within 1 month postoperation were examined. The integrated area under the curve (iAUC) was compared among mGPS, CAR, and the combined classification (CC). The optimal CAR cut-off for discriminating overall survival was 0.14. Based on this cut-off, the mGPS 0 group was divided into the mGPS 0 with low CAR and the mGPS 0 with high CAR groups, whereas all mGPS 1 and 2 patients were classified into the high CAR group. CC was an independent prognostic factor, and its iAUC value (0.587, 95% CI 0.553–0.624) was superior to those of the mGPS (0.544, 95% CI 0.516–0.576) (bootstrap iAUC mean difference = 0.043; 95% CI = 0.015–0.072) and CAR (0.578, 95% CI 0.545–0.613) (bootstrap iAUC mean difference = 0.009; 95% CI = 0.002–0.017), respectively. In conclusion, the combination of mGPS and CAR has a synergistic effect and has a higher prognostic accuracy than mGPS or CAR alone in patients with CRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7690417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76904172020-11-27 Clinical Impact of Combined Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Son, Woosung Shin, Su-Jin Park, Su Hyeong Lee, Soo Kyung Park, Eun Jung Baik, Seung Hyuk Lee, Kang Young Kang, Jeonghyun Diagnostics (Basel) Article The prognostic impact of the combination of the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of this combination as a predictor of survival in CRC patients. We retrospectively evaluated 769 CRC patients who had undergone surgery between January 2006 and March 2014. The CAR and mGPS within 1 month postoperation were examined. The integrated area under the curve (iAUC) was compared among mGPS, CAR, and the combined classification (CC). The optimal CAR cut-off for discriminating overall survival was 0.14. Based on this cut-off, the mGPS 0 group was divided into the mGPS 0 with low CAR and the mGPS 0 with high CAR groups, whereas all mGPS 1 and 2 patients were classified into the high CAR group. CC was an independent prognostic factor, and its iAUC value (0.587, 95% CI 0.553–0.624) was superior to those of the mGPS (0.544, 95% CI 0.516–0.576) (bootstrap iAUC mean difference = 0.043; 95% CI = 0.015–0.072) and CAR (0.578, 95% CI 0.545–0.613) (bootstrap iAUC mean difference = 0.009; 95% CI = 0.002–0.017), respectively. In conclusion, the combination of mGPS and CAR has a synergistic effect and has a higher prognostic accuracy than mGPS or CAR alone in patients with CRC. MDPI 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7690417/ /pubmed/33105743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110859 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Son, Woosung Shin, Su-Jin Park, Su Hyeong Lee, Soo Kyung Park, Eun Jung Baik, Seung Hyuk Lee, Kang Young Kang, Jeonghyun Clinical Impact of Combined Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Patients with Colorectal Cancer |
title | Clinical Impact of Combined Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Patients with Colorectal Cancer |
title_full | Clinical Impact of Combined Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Patients with Colorectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Clinical Impact of Combined Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Patients with Colorectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Impact of Combined Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Patients with Colorectal Cancer |
title_short | Clinical Impact of Combined Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Patients with Colorectal Cancer |
title_sort | clinical impact of combined modified glasgow prognostic score and c-reactive protein/albumin ratio in patients with colorectal cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7690417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33105743 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonwoosung clinicalimpactofcombinedmodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreandcreactiveproteinalbuminratioinpatientswithcolorectalcancer AT shinsujin clinicalimpactofcombinedmodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreandcreactiveproteinalbuminratioinpatientswithcolorectalcancer AT parksuhyeong clinicalimpactofcombinedmodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreandcreactiveproteinalbuminratioinpatientswithcolorectalcancer AT leesookyung clinicalimpactofcombinedmodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreandcreactiveproteinalbuminratioinpatientswithcolorectalcancer AT parkeunjung clinicalimpactofcombinedmodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreandcreactiveproteinalbuminratioinpatientswithcolorectalcancer AT baikseunghyuk clinicalimpactofcombinedmodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreandcreactiveproteinalbuminratioinpatientswithcolorectalcancer AT leekangyoung clinicalimpactofcombinedmodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreandcreactiveproteinalbuminratioinpatientswithcolorectalcancer AT kangjeonghyun clinicalimpactofcombinedmodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreandcreactiveproteinalbuminratioinpatientswithcolorectalcancer |