Cargando…
Internal Jugular Vein Fenestration and Duplication: Anatomical Findings, Prevalence, and Literature Review
Background: Comprehensive knowledge of the internal jugular vein (IJV) regarding its anatomical variations and the pattern of its course is valuable for preventing unexpected injuries during surgical procedures or central venous access. IJV anatomical anomalies such as fenestration and duplication a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.593367 |
_version_ | 1783614245775081472 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xiqian Peng, Liwei Guo, Haixing Hernesniemi, Juha Xiong, Xuepeng Andrade-Barazarte, Hugo Qian, Rongjun |
author_facet | Wang, Xiqian Peng, Liwei Guo, Haixing Hernesniemi, Juha Xiong, Xuepeng Andrade-Barazarte, Hugo Qian, Rongjun |
author_sort | Wang, Xiqian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Comprehensive knowledge of the internal jugular vein (IJV) regarding its anatomical variations and the pattern of its course is valuable for preventing unexpected injuries during surgical procedures or central venous access. IJV anatomical anomalies such as fenestration and duplication are rare, mainly represented by case reports, and intraoperative findings. Objective: To present two additional cases of IJV anomalies and highlight its clinical presentation, anatomical characteristics, management, and prevalence through an extensive literature review. Methods and Case Reports: From January 2017 to December 2018, we retrospectively collected data of 221 patients undergoing neck dissection (ND) procedures and identified two patients with IJV anomalies (fenestration and duplication) providing a clinical prevalence of ~0.9%. The IJV fenestration referred to an IJV bifurcation that reunites proximal to the subclavian vein, whereas in the IJV duplication both branches remain separated. In both of our cases, the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) crossed the window between the IJV branches. Conclusion: Anatomical variations are more likely to be identified intraoperatively or incidentally, and due to the risk of SAN and vascular injury, special attention should be taken to identify them preoperatively in order to reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury and unexpected complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7691239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76912392020-12-04 Internal Jugular Vein Fenestration and Duplication: Anatomical Findings, Prevalence, and Literature Review Wang, Xiqian Peng, Liwei Guo, Haixing Hernesniemi, Juha Xiong, Xuepeng Andrade-Barazarte, Hugo Qian, Rongjun Front Surg Surgery Background: Comprehensive knowledge of the internal jugular vein (IJV) regarding its anatomical variations and the pattern of its course is valuable for preventing unexpected injuries during surgical procedures or central venous access. IJV anatomical anomalies such as fenestration and duplication are rare, mainly represented by case reports, and intraoperative findings. Objective: To present two additional cases of IJV anomalies and highlight its clinical presentation, anatomical characteristics, management, and prevalence through an extensive literature review. Methods and Case Reports: From January 2017 to December 2018, we retrospectively collected data of 221 patients undergoing neck dissection (ND) procedures and identified two patients with IJV anomalies (fenestration and duplication) providing a clinical prevalence of ~0.9%. The IJV fenestration referred to an IJV bifurcation that reunites proximal to the subclavian vein, whereas in the IJV duplication both branches remain separated. In both of our cases, the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) crossed the window between the IJV branches. Conclusion: Anatomical variations are more likely to be identified intraoperatively or incidentally, and due to the risk of SAN and vascular injury, special attention should be taken to identify them preoperatively in order to reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury and unexpected complications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7691239/ /pubmed/33282909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.593367 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wang, Peng, Guo, Hernesniemi, Xiong, Andrade-Barazarte and Qian. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Wang, Xiqian Peng, Liwei Guo, Haixing Hernesniemi, Juha Xiong, Xuepeng Andrade-Barazarte, Hugo Qian, Rongjun Internal Jugular Vein Fenestration and Duplication: Anatomical Findings, Prevalence, and Literature Review |
title | Internal Jugular Vein Fenestration and Duplication: Anatomical Findings, Prevalence, and Literature Review |
title_full | Internal Jugular Vein Fenestration and Duplication: Anatomical Findings, Prevalence, and Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Internal Jugular Vein Fenestration and Duplication: Anatomical Findings, Prevalence, and Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Internal Jugular Vein Fenestration and Duplication: Anatomical Findings, Prevalence, and Literature Review |
title_short | Internal Jugular Vein Fenestration and Duplication: Anatomical Findings, Prevalence, and Literature Review |
title_sort | internal jugular vein fenestration and duplication: anatomical findings, prevalence, and literature review |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33282909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.593367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxiqian internaljugularveinfenestrationandduplicationanatomicalfindingsprevalenceandliteraturereview AT pengliwei internaljugularveinfenestrationandduplicationanatomicalfindingsprevalenceandliteraturereview AT guohaixing internaljugularveinfenestrationandduplicationanatomicalfindingsprevalenceandliteraturereview AT hernesniemijuha internaljugularveinfenestrationandduplicationanatomicalfindingsprevalenceandliteraturereview AT xiongxuepeng internaljugularveinfenestrationandduplicationanatomicalfindingsprevalenceandliteraturereview AT andradebarazartehugo internaljugularveinfenestrationandduplicationanatomicalfindingsprevalenceandliteraturereview AT qianrongjun internaljugularveinfenestrationandduplicationanatomicalfindingsprevalenceandliteraturereview |