Cargando…

Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to perform a clinical and radiographic analysis of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) restored with cast metal posts (CMPs) or prefabricated glass fiber posts (GFPs) and crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty ETT were restored with 25 CMPs and 25 GFPs at a private...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia, Paula Pontes, Cappoani, Aline, Schelbauer, Ricardo Susin, Correr, Gisele Maria, Gonzaga, Carla Castiglia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294414
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e49
_version_ 1783614251796004864
author Garcia, Paula Pontes
Cappoani, Aline
Schelbauer, Ricardo Susin
Correr, Gisele Maria
Gonzaga, Carla Castiglia
author_facet Garcia, Paula Pontes
Cappoani, Aline
Schelbauer, Ricardo Susin
Correr, Gisele Maria
Gonzaga, Carla Castiglia
author_sort Garcia, Paula Pontes
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to perform a clinical and radiographic analysis of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) restored with cast metal posts (CMPs) or prefabricated glass fiber posts (GFPs) and crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty ETT were restored with 25 CMPs and 25 GFPs at a private dental clinic between 2001 and 2016. The restorations consisted of 12 all-ceramic crowns, 31 metal-ceramic crowns, and 7 composite resin crowns. Demographic data, type of teeth, type of post-and-core system, time of placement, crown restorations, the number of proximal contacts, the type of antagonist, and reports of any complications after post-and-core placement were recorded for each patient. Assessments were performed at baseline (radiographic) and follow-up (radiographic and clinical). Data were analyzed by the McNemar test, the Pearson χ(2) test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves (α = 0.05). The mean follow-up was 67.6 months. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed for any of the radiographic parameters when the baseline and final radiographs were compared. In the clinical evaluation, anatomical form (p = 0.009) and occlusion (p = 0.001) showed significant differences according to the type of crown restoration; specifically, metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns outperformed composite resin crowns. CONCLUSIONS: CMPs and GFPs showed favorable results for restoring ETT after 6 years of follow-up. All-ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns showed higher survival rates and better clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7691265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76912652020-12-07 Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth Garcia, Paula Pontes Cappoani, Aline Schelbauer, Ricardo Susin Correr, Gisele Maria Gonzaga, Carla Castiglia Restor Dent Endod Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to perform a clinical and radiographic analysis of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) restored with cast metal posts (CMPs) or prefabricated glass fiber posts (GFPs) and crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty ETT were restored with 25 CMPs and 25 GFPs at a private dental clinic between 2001 and 2016. The restorations consisted of 12 all-ceramic crowns, 31 metal-ceramic crowns, and 7 composite resin crowns. Demographic data, type of teeth, type of post-and-core system, time of placement, crown restorations, the number of proximal contacts, the type of antagonist, and reports of any complications after post-and-core placement were recorded for each patient. Assessments were performed at baseline (radiographic) and follow-up (radiographic and clinical). Data were analyzed by the McNemar test, the Pearson χ(2) test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves (α = 0.05). The mean follow-up was 67.6 months. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed for any of the radiographic parameters when the baseline and final radiographs were compared. In the clinical evaluation, anatomical form (p = 0.009) and occlusion (p = 0.001) showed significant differences according to the type of crown restoration; specifically, metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns outperformed composite resin crowns. CONCLUSIONS: CMPs and GFPs showed favorable results for restoring ETT after 6 years of follow-up. All-ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns showed higher survival rates and better clinical outcomes. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2020-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7691265/ /pubmed/33294414 http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e49 Text en Copyright © 2020. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garcia, Paula Pontes
Cappoani, Aline
Schelbauer, Ricardo Susin
Correr, Gisele Maria
Gonzaga, Carla Castiglia
Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth
title Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth
title_full Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth
title_fullStr Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth
title_short Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth
title_sort retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294414
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2020.45.e49
work_keys_str_mv AT garciapaulapontes retrospectiveclinicalandradiographicevaluationofrestoredendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT cappoanialine retrospectiveclinicalandradiographicevaluationofrestoredendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT schelbauerricardosusin retrospectiveclinicalandradiographicevaluationofrestoredendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT corrergiselemaria retrospectiveclinicalandradiographicevaluationofrestoredendodonticallytreatedteeth
AT gonzagacarlacastiglia retrospectiveclinicalandradiographicevaluationofrestoredendodonticallytreatedteeth