Cargando…

Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea

Benthic habitats and communities are key components of the marine ecosystem. Securing their functioning is a central aim in marine environmental management, where monitoring data provide the base for assessing the state of marine ecosystems. In the Baltic Sea, a > 50-year-long tradition of zooben...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nygård, Henrik, Lindegarth, Mats, Darr, Alexander, Dinesen, Grete E., Eigaard, Ole R., Lips, Inga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08764-7
_version_ 1783614262264987648
author Nygård, Henrik
Lindegarth, Mats
Darr, Alexander
Dinesen, Grete E.
Eigaard, Ole R.
Lips, Inga
author_facet Nygård, Henrik
Lindegarth, Mats
Darr, Alexander
Dinesen, Grete E.
Eigaard, Ole R.
Lips, Inga
author_sort Nygård, Henrik
collection PubMed
description Benthic habitats and communities are key components of the marine ecosystem. Securing their functioning is a central aim in marine environmental management, where monitoring data provide the base for assessing the state of marine ecosystems. In the Baltic Sea, a > 50-year-long tradition of zoobenthic monitoring exists. However, the monitoring programmes were designed prior to the current policies, primarily to detect long-term trends at basin-scale and are thus not optimal to fulfil recent requirements such as area-based periodic status assessments. Here, we review the current monitoring programmes and assess the precision and representativity of the monitoring data in status assessments to identify routes for improvement. At present, the monitoring is focused on soft-bottoms, not accounting for all habitat types occurring in the Baltic Sea. Evaluating the sources of variance in the assessment data revealed that the component accounting for variability among stations forms the largest proportion of the uncertainty. Furthermore, it is shown that the precision of the status estimates can be improved, with the current number of samples. Reducing sampling effort per station, but sampling more stations, is the best option to improve precision in status assessments. Furthermore, by allocating the sampling stations more evenly in the sub-basins, a better representativity of the area can be achieved. However, emphasis on securing the long-term data series is needed if changes to the monitoring programmes are planned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7691314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76913142020-12-02 Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea Nygård, Henrik Lindegarth, Mats Darr, Alexander Dinesen, Grete E. Eigaard, Ole R. Lips, Inga Environ Monit Assess Article Benthic habitats and communities are key components of the marine ecosystem. Securing their functioning is a central aim in marine environmental management, where monitoring data provide the base for assessing the state of marine ecosystems. In the Baltic Sea, a > 50-year-long tradition of zoobenthic monitoring exists. However, the monitoring programmes were designed prior to the current policies, primarily to detect long-term trends at basin-scale and are thus not optimal to fulfil recent requirements such as area-based periodic status assessments. Here, we review the current monitoring programmes and assess the precision and representativity of the monitoring data in status assessments to identify routes for improvement. At present, the monitoring is focused on soft-bottoms, not accounting for all habitat types occurring in the Baltic Sea. Evaluating the sources of variance in the assessment data revealed that the component accounting for variability among stations forms the largest proportion of the uncertainty. Furthermore, it is shown that the precision of the status estimates can be improved, with the current number of samples. Reducing sampling effort per station, but sampling more stations, is the best option to improve precision in status assessments. Furthermore, by allocating the sampling stations more evenly in the sub-basins, a better representativity of the area can be achieved. However, emphasis on securing the long-term data series is needed if changes to the monitoring programmes are planned. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-27 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7691314/ /pubmed/33244647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08764-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Nygård, Henrik
Lindegarth, Mats
Darr, Alexander
Dinesen, Grete E.
Eigaard, Ole R.
Lips, Inga
Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea
title Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea
title_full Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea
title_fullStr Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea
title_full_unstemmed Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea
title_short Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea
title_sort developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the baltic sea
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08764-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nygardhenrik developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea
AT lindegarthmats developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea
AT darralexander developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea
AT dinesengretee developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea
AT eigaardoler developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea
AT lipsinga developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea