Cargando…
Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea
Benthic habitats and communities are key components of the marine ecosystem. Securing their functioning is a central aim in marine environmental management, where monitoring data provide the base for assessing the state of marine ecosystems. In the Baltic Sea, a > 50-year-long tradition of zooben...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08764-7 |
_version_ | 1783614262264987648 |
---|---|
author | Nygård, Henrik Lindegarth, Mats Darr, Alexander Dinesen, Grete E. Eigaard, Ole R. Lips, Inga |
author_facet | Nygård, Henrik Lindegarth, Mats Darr, Alexander Dinesen, Grete E. Eigaard, Ole R. Lips, Inga |
author_sort | Nygård, Henrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Benthic habitats and communities are key components of the marine ecosystem. Securing their functioning is a central aim in marine environmental management, where monitoring data provide the base for assessing the state of marine ecosystems. In the Baltic Sea, a > 50-year-long tradition of zoobenthic monitoring exists. However, the monitoring programmes were designed prior to the current policies, primarily to detect long-term trends at basin-scale and are thus not optimal to fulfil recent requirements such as area-based periodic status assessments. Here, we review the current monitoring programmes and assess the precision and representativity of the monitoring data in status assessments to identify routes for improvement. At present, the monitoring is focused on soft-bottoms, not accounting for all habitat types occurring in the Baltic Sea. Evaluating the sources of variance in the assessment data revealed that the component accounting for variability among stations forms the largest proportion of the uncertainty. Furthermore, it is shown that the precision of the status estimates can be improved, with the current number of samples. Reducing sampling effort per station, but sampling more stations, is the best option to improve precision in status assessments. Furthermore, by allocating the sampling stations more evenly in the sub-basins, a better representativity of the area can be achieved. However, emphasis on securing the long-term data series is needed if changes to the monitoring programmes are planned. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7691314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76913142020-12-02 Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea Nygård, Henrik Lindegarth, Mats Darr, Alexander Dinesen, Grete E. Eigaard, Ole R. Lips, Inga Environ Monit Assess Article Benthic habitats and communities are key components of the marine ecosystem. Securing their functioning is a central aim in marine environmental management, where monitoring data provide the base for assessing the state of marine ecosystems. In the Baltic Sea, a > 50-year-long tradition of zoobenthic monitoring exists. However, the monitoring programmes were designed prior to the current policies, primarily to detect long-term trends at basin-scale and are thus not optimal to fulfil recent requirements such as area-based periodic status assessments. Here, we review the current monitoring programmes and assess the precision and representativity of the monitoring data in status assessments to identify routes for improvement. At present, the monitoring is focused on soft-bottoms, not accounting for all habitat types occurring in the Baltic Sea. Evaluating the sources of variance in the assessment data revealed that the component accounting for variability among stations forms the largest proportion of the uncertainty. Furthermore, it is shown that the precision of the status estimates can be improved, with the current number of samples. Reducing sampling effort per station, but sampling more stations, is the best option to improve precision in status assessments. Furthermore, by allocating the sampling stations more evenly in the sub-basins, a better representativity of the area can be achieved. However, emphasis on securing the long-term data series is needed if changes to the monitoring programmes are planned. Springer International Publishing 2020-11-27 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7691314/ /pubmed/33244647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08764-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Nygård, Henrik Lindegarth, Mats Darr, Alexander Dinesen, Grete E. Eigaard, Ole R. Lips, Inga Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea |
title | Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea |
title_full | Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea |
title_fullStr | Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea |
title_short | Developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the Baltic Sea |
title_sort | developing benthic monitoring programmes to support precise and representative status assessments: a case study from the baltic sea |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33244647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08764-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nygardhenrik developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea AT lindegarthmats developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea AT darralexander developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea AT dinesengretee developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea AT eigaardoler developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea AT lipsinga developingbenthicmonitoringprogrammestosupportpreciseandrepresentativestatusassessmentsacasestudyfromthebalticsea |