Cargando…
Systematizing Effective Practice, Embedding It in Standard Practice
Academia uses methods and techniques that are cutting edge and constantly evolving, while the underlying cultures and working practices remain rooted in the 19(th)-century model of the independent scientist. Standardization in processes and data standards—delivered via foundational and ongoing train...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100151 |
_version_ | 1783614280287911936 |
---|---|
author | The UK Reproducibility Network Steering Group |
author_facet | The UK Reproducibility Network Steering Group |
author_sort | The UK Reproducibility Network Steering Group |
collection | PubMed |
description | Academia uses methods and techniques that are cutting edge and constantly evolving, while the underlying cultures and working practices remain rooted in the 19(th)-century model of the independent scientist. Standardization in processes and data standards—delivered via foundational and ongoing training—could ensure a common minimum standard, increase interoperability across the sector, and drive improvements in research quality. But change will require a coordinated approach that recognizes the systems nature of the challenge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7691391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76913912020-12-07 Systematizing Effective Practice, Embedding It in Standard Practice The UK Reproducibility Network Steering Group Patterns (N Y) Opinion Academia uses methods and techniques that are cutting edge and constantly evolving, while the underlying cultures and working practices remain rooted in the 19(th)-century model of the independent scientist. Standardization in processes and data standards—delivered via foundational and ongoing training—could ensure a common minimum standard, increase interoperability across the sector, and drive improvements in research quality. But change will require a coordinated approach that recognizes the systems nature of the challenge. Elsevier 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7691391/ /pubmed/33294880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100151 Text en © 2020 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Opinion The UK Reproducibility Network Steering Group Systematizing Effective Practice, Embedding It in Standard Practice |
title | Systematizing Effective Practice, Embedding It in Standard Practice |
title_full | Systematizing Effective Practice, Embedding It in Standard Practice |
title_fullStr | Systematizing Effective Practice, Embedding It in Standard Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematizing Effective Practice, Embedding It in Standard Practice |
title_short | Systematizing Effective Practice, Embedding It in Standard Practice |
title_sort | systematizing effective practice, embedding it in standard practice |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT theukreproducibilitynetworksteeringgroup systematizingeffectivepracticeembeddingitinstandardpractice |