Cargando…

Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations

In many ways, dogs are an ideal model for the study of genetic erosion and population recovery, problems of major concern in the field of conservation genetics. Genetic diversity in many dog breeds has been declining systematically since the beginning of the 1800s, when modern breeding practices cam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sams, Aaron J., Ford, Brett, Gardner, Adam, Boyko, Adam R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13038
_version_ 1783614292807909376
author Sams, Aaron J.
Ford, Brett
Gardner, Adam
Boyko, Adam R.
author_facet Sams, Aaron J.
Ford, Brett
Gardner, Adam
Boyko, Adam R.
author_sort Sams, Aaron J.
collection PubMed
description In many ways, dogs are an ideal model for the study of genetic erosion and population recovery, problems of major concern in the field of conservation genetics. Genetic diversity in many dog breeds has been declining systematically since the beginning of the 1800s, when modern breeding practices came into fashion. As such, inbreeding in domestic dog breeds is substantial and widespread and has led to an increase in recessive deleterious mutations of high effect as well as general inbreeding depression. Pedigrees can in theory be used to guide breeding decisions, though are often incomplete and do not reflect the full history of inbreeding. Small microsatellite panels are also used in some cases to choose mating pairs to produce litters with low levels of inbreeding. However, the long‐term impact of such practices has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we use forward simulation on a model of the dog genome to examine the impact of using limited marker panels to guide pairwise mating decisions on genome‐wide population‐level genetic diversity. Our results suggest that in unmanaged populations, where breeding decisions are made at the pairwise—rather than population‐level, such panels can lead to accelerated loss of genetic diversity at genome regions unlinked to panel markers, compared to random mating. These results demonstrate the importance of genome‐wide genetic panels for managing and conserving genetic diversity in dogs and other companion animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7691451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76914512020-12-07 Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations Sams, Aaron J. Ford, Brett Gardner, Adam Boyko, Adam R. Evol Appl Original Articles In many ways, dogs are an ideal model for the study of genetic erosion and population recovery, problems of major concern in the field of conservation genetics. Genetic diversity in many dog breeds has been declining systematically since the beginning of the 1800s, when modern breeding practices came into fashion. As such, inbreeding in domestic dog breeds is substantial and widespread and has led to an increase in recessive deleterious mutations of high effect as well as general inbreeding depression. Pedigrees can in theory be used to guide breeding decisions, though are often incomplete and do not reflect the full history of inbreeding. Small microsatellite panels are also used in some cases to choose mating pairs to produce litters with low levels of inbreeding. However, the long‐term impact of such practices has not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we use forward simulation on a model of the dog genome to examine the impact of using limited marker panels to guide pairwise mating decisions on genome‐wide population‐level genetic diversity. Our results suggest that in unmanaged populations, where breeding decisions are made at the pairwise—rather than population‐level, such panels can lead to accelerated loss of genetic diversity at genome regions unlinked to panel markers, compared to random mating. These results demonstrate the importance of genome‐wide genetic panels for managing and conserving genetic diversity in dogs and other companion animals. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7691451/ /pubmed/33294008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13038 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sams, Aaron J.
Ford, Brett
Gardner, Adam
Boyko, Adam R.
Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations
title Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations
title_full Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations
title_fullStr Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations
title_full_unstemmed Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations
title_short Examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations
title_sort examination of the efficacy of small genetic panels in genomic conservation of companion animal populations
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13038
work_keys_str_mv AT samsaaronj examinationoftheefficacyofsmallgeneticpanelsingenomicconservationofcompanionanimalpopulations
AT fordbrett examinationoftheefficacyofsmallgeneticpanelsingenomicconservationofcompanionanimalpopulations
AT gardneradam examinationoftheefficacyofsmallgeneticpanelsingenomicconservationofcompanionanimalpopulations
AT boykoadamr examinationoftheefficacyofsmallgeneticpanelsingenomicconservationofcompanionanimalpopulations