Cargando…
Modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA)
In the kitchen of the consumer, two main transmission routes are relevant for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA): the cross‐contamination route, where a pathogen on a food product may evade heating by transmission via hands, kitchen utensils and other surfaces, e.g. to non‐contamina...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181106 |
_version_ | 1783614332059254784 |
---|---|
author | Iulietto, Maria Francesca Evers, Eric G |
author_facet | Iulietto, Maria Francesca Evers, Eric G |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the kitchen of the consumer, two main transmission routes are relevant for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA): the cross‐contamination route, where a pathogen on a food product may evade heating by transmission via hands, kitchen utensils and other surfaces, e.g. to non‐contaminated products to be consumed raw; and the heating route, where pathogens remain on the food product and are for the most part inactivated through heating. This project was undertaken to model and estimate the magnitude of cross‐contamination in the domestic environment. Scientific information from the relevant literature was collected and analyzed, to define the cross‐contamination routes, to describe the variability sources and to extract and harmonise the transfer fractions to be included as model parameters. The model was used to estimate the relative impact of the cross‐contamination routes for different scenarios. In addition, the effectiveness of several interventions in reducing the risk of food‐borne diseases due to cross‐contamination was investigated. The outputs of the model showed that the cutting board route presents a higher impact compared to other routes and replacement of the kitchen utensils is more effective than other interventions investigated; the transfer to other surfaces and objects, which can house bacteria in the environment, is also described. Laboratory cross‐contamination trials have been performed to estimate bacterial transfer via cutting, from the external surface of the meat to the cutting surfaces and to the knife. The results, obtained from the laboratory trials, show magnitudes of and differences in the bacterial transfer fraction to the knife and the cutting surface in relation to which side of the meat is contaminated. Despite the complexity of factors which influence bacterial transfer, the combination of laboratory work with mathematical modelling enhanced scientific understanding and appreciation of the uncertainty of the estimates. QMRA methodology results in magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen and evaluation of intervention strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7691616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76916162020-12-07 Modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) Iulietto, Maria Francesca Evers, Eric G EFSA J EU‐FORA Series 3 In the kitchen of the consumer, two main transmission routes are relevant for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA): the cross‐contamination route, where a pathogen on a food product may evade heating by transmission via hands, kitchen utensils and other surfaces, e.g. to non‐contaminated products to be consumed raw; and the heating route, where pathogens remain on the food product and are for the most part inactivated through heating. This project was undertaken to model and estimate the magnitude of cross‐contamination in the domestic environment. Scientific information from the relevant literature was collected and analyzed, to define the cross‐contamination routes, to describe the variability sources and to extract and harmonise the transfer fractions to be included as model parameters. The model was used to estimate the relative impact of the cross‐contamination routes for different scenarios. In addition, the effectiveness of several interventions in reducing the risk of food‐borne diseases due to cross‐contamination was investigated. The outputs of the model showed that the cutting board route presents a higher impact compared to other routes and replacement of the kitchen utensils is more effective than other interventions investigated; the transfer to other surfaces and objects, which can house bacteria in the environment, is also described. Laboratory cross‐contamination trials have been performed to estimate bacterial transfer via cutting, from the external surface of the meat to the cutting surfaces and to the knife. The results, obtained from the laboratory trials, show magnitudes of and differences in the bacterial transfer fraction to the knife and the cutting surface in relation to which side of the meat is contaminated. Despite the complexity of factors which influence bacterial transfer, the combination of laboratory work with mathematical modelling enhanced scientific understanding and appreciation of the uncertainty of the estimates. QMRA methodology results in magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen and evaluation of intervention strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7691616/ /pubmed/33294045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181106 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | EU‐FORA Series 3 Iulietto, Maria Francesca Evers, Eric G Modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) |
title | Modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) |
title_full | Modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) |
title_fullStr | Modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) |
title_full_unstemmed | Modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) |
title_short | Modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) |
title_sort | modelling and magnitude estimation of cross‐contamination in the kitchen for quantitative microbiological risk assessment (qmra) |
topic | EU‐FORA Series 3 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294045 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT modellingandmagnitudeestimationofcrosscontaminationinthekitchenforquantitativemicrobiologicalriskassessmentqmra AT iuliettomariafrancesca modellingandmagnitudeestimationofcrosscontaminationinthekitchenforquantitativemicrobiologicalriskassessmentqmra AT eversericg modellingandmagnitudeestimationofcrosscontaminationinthekitchenforquantitativemicrobiologicalriskassessmentqmra |