Cargando…
Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process
Approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products in the EU is made based on a strict risk assessment of the agronomic use of the plant protection products. Regulation 1107/2009 regulates the procedure in the EU with complex procedures involving many actors. ‘The Farm to F...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294052 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181113 |
_version_ | 1783614357207252992 |
---|---|
author | Molteni, Roberto Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis |
author_facet | Molteni, Roberto Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products in the EU is made based on a strict risk assessment of the agronomic use of the plant protection products. Regulation 1107/2009 regulates the procedure in the EU with complex procedures involving many actors. ‘The Farm to Fork strategy’ and ‘The Biodiversity for 2030 strategy’, that are the heart of the ‘European Green Deal’, aiming to make food systems fair, healthy, environmentally friendly and put Europe's biodiversity on the path to recovery by 2030, for the benefit of people, climate and the planet. Therefore, ‘The Farm to Fork strategy’ and ‘The Biodiversity for 2030 strategy’ represents a challenge for the evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products in which the risk management will constitute a key element on the approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products. The aim of the work was to get knowledge of the large body of EU legislation and guidelines in the plant production products, identifying the most critical points of the pesticide evaluation in each of its areas, analysing the complexity and the interaction between these different areas. This study allowed to have a global and clearer vision of these procedures, with the focus on highlighting inconsistency and to propose speed up alternatives. Finally, this work will also facilitate not only the risk assessment but also the decision‐making on the approval of active substances and the authorisation of plant protection products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7691737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76917372020-12-07 Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process Molteni, Roberto Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis EFSA J EU‐FORA Series 3 Approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products in the EU is made based on a strict risk assessment of the agronomic use of the plant protection products. Regulation 1107/2009 regulates the procedure in the EU with complex procedures involving many actors. ‘The Farm to Fork strategy’ and ‘The Biodiversity for 2030 strategy’, that are the heart of the ‘European Green Deal’, aiming to make food systems fair, healthy, environmentally friendly and put Europe's biodiversity on the path to recovery by 2030, for the benefit of people, climate and the planet. Therefore, ‘The Farm to Fork strategy’ and ‘The Biodiversity for 2030 strategy’ represents a challenge for the evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products in which the risk management will constitute a key element on the approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products. The aim of the work was to get knowledge of the large body of EU legislation and guidelines in the plant production products, identifying the most critical points of the pesticide evaluation in each of its areas, analysing the complexity and the interaction between these different areas. This study allowed to have a global and clearer vision of these procedures, with the focus on highlighting inconsistency and to propose speed up alternatives. Finally, this work will also facilitate not only the risk assessment but also the decision‐making on the approval of active substances and the authorisation of plant protection products. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7691737/ /pubmed/33294052 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181113 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | EU‐FORA Series 3 Molteni, Roberto Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process |
title | Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process |
title_full | Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process |
title_fullStr | Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process |
title_full_unstemmed | Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process |
title_short | Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process |
title_sort | study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process |
topic | EU‐FORA Series 3 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294052 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT studyofthedifferentevaluationareasinthepesticideriskassessmentprocess AT molteniroberto studyofthedifferentevaluationareasinthepesticideriskassessmentprocess AT alonsopradosjoseluis studyofthedifferentevaluationareasinthepesticideriskassessmentprocess |