Cargando…

Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process

Approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products in the EU is made based on a strict risk assessment of the agronomic use of the plant protection products. Regulation 1107/2009 regulates the procedure in the EU with complex procedures involving many actors. ‘The Farm to F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molteni, Roberto, Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294052
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181113
_version_ 1783614357207252992
author Molteni, Roberto
Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis
author_facet Molteni, Roberto
Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis
collection PubMed
description Approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products in the EU is made based on a strict risk assessment of the agronomic use of the plant protection products. Regulation 1107/2009 regulates the procedure in the EU with complex procedures involving many actors. ‘The Farm to Fork strategy’ and ‘The Biodiversity for 2030 strategy’, that are the heart of the ‘European Green Deal’, aiming to make food systems fair, healthy, environmentally friendly and put Europe's biodiversity on the path to recovery by 2030, for the benefit of people, climate and the planet. Therefore, ‘The Farm to Fork strategy’ and ‘The Biodiversity for 2030 strategy’ represents a challenge for the evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products in which the risk management will constitute a key element on the approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products. The aim of the work was to get knowledge of the large body of EU legislation and guidelines in the plant production products, identifying the most critical points of the pesticide evaluation in each of its areas, analysing the complexity and the interaction between these different areas. This study allowed to have a global and clearer vision of these procedures, with the focus on highlighting inconsistency and to propose speed up alternatives. Finally, this work will also facilitate not only the risk assessment but also the decision‐making on the approval of active substances and the authorisation of plant protection products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7691737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76917372020-12-07 Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process Molteni, Roberto Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis EFSA J EU‐FORA Series 3 Approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products in the EU is made based on a strict risk assessment of the agronomic use of the plant protection products. Regulation 1107/2009 regulates the procedure in the EU with complex procedures involving many actors. ‘The Farm to Fork strategy’ and ‘The Biodiversity for 2030 strategy’, that are the heart of the ‘European Green Deal’, aiming to make food systems fair, healthy, environmentally friendly and put Europe's biodiversity on the path to recovery by 2030, for the benefit of people, climate and the planet. Therefore, ‘The Farm to Fork strategy’ and ‘The Biodiversity for 2030 strategy’ represents a challenge for the evaluation and authorisation of plant protection products in which the risk management will constitute a key element on the approval of active substances and authorisation of plant protection products. The aim of the work was to get knowledge of the large body of EU legislation and guidelines in the plant production products, identifying the most critical points of the pesticide evaluation in each of its areas, analysing the complexity and the interaction between these different areas. This study allowed to have a global and clearer vision of these procedures, with the focus on highlighting inconsistency and to propose speed up alternatives. Finally, this work will also facilitate not only the risk assessment but also the decision‐making on the approval of active substances and the authorisation of plant protection products. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7691737/ /pubmed/33294052 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181113 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle EU‐FORA Series 3
Molteni, Roberto
Alonso‐Prados, José‐Luis
Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process
title Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process
title_full Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process
title_fullStr Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process
title_full_unstemmed Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process
title_short Study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process
title_sort study of the different evaluation areas in the pesticide risk assessment process
topic EU‐FORA Series 3
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7691737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294052
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181113
work_keys_str_mv AT studyofthedifferentevaluationareasinthepesticideriskassessmentprocess
AT molteniroberto studyofthedifferentevaluationareasinthepesticideriskassessmentprocess
AT alonsopradosjoseluis studyofthedifferentevaluationareasinthepesticideriskassessmentprocess