Cargando…

Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States †

Despite the increasing incidence of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA), the optimal treatment strategy for the disease remains unknown. The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns for GEJA in the United States. The National Cancer Database was searched to identify all...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Bradford J., Chiang, Yi-Ju, Das, Prajnan, Minsky, Bruce D., Blum, Mariela A., Ajani, Jaffer A., Estrella, Jeannelyn S., Hofstetter, Wayne L., Tzeng, Ching-Wei D., Badgwell, Brian D., Mansfield, Paul F., Ikoma, Naruhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33138060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113495
_version_ 1783614473773252608
author Kim, Bradford J.
Chiang, Yi-Ju
Das, Prajnan
Minsky, Bruce D.
Blum, Mariela A.
Ajani, Jaffer A.
Estrella, Jeannelyn S.
Hofstetter, Wayne L.
Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
Badgwell, Brian D.
Mansfield, Paul F.
Ikoma, Naruhiko
author_facet Kim, Bradford J.
Chiang, Yi-Ju
Das, Prajnan
Minsky, Bruce D.
Blum, Mariela A.
Ajani, Jaffer A.
Estrella, Jeannelyn S.
Hofstetter, Wayne L.
Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
Badgwell, Brian D.
Mansfield, Paul F.
Ikoma, Naruhiko
author_sort Kim, Bradford J.
collection PubMed
description Despite the increasing incidence of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA), the optimal treatment strategy for the disease remains unknown. The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns for GEJA in the United States. The National Cancer Database was searched to identify all patients who underwent resection of the lower esophagus, abdominal esophagus, and/or gastric cardia for GEJA between 2006 and 2016. Patients were grouped by clinical disease stage: early localized (L; T1-2N0), locally advanced (LA; T3-4N0), regional (R; T1-2N+), or regionally advanced (RA; T3-4N+). The search identified 28,852 GEJA patients. The dominant age range was 60–69 years (39%). Most patients were men (85%), and most were white (92%). Most L patients (69%) underwent upfront surgery, whereas most LA, R, and RA patients received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT; 86%, 80%, and 90%, respectively). Among patients who received NAT, 85% received chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant therapy was relatively uncommon across all groups (15–20%). In the LA, R, and RA groups, overall survival was greater in patients who received NAT compared to upfront surgery (p < 0.001). With the exception of patients with early localized node-negative disease, most GEJA patients receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy despite the lack of prospective trials reporting survival benefit over chemotherapy alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7692279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76922792020-11-28 Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States † Kim, Bradford J. Chiang, Yi-Ju Das, Prajnan Minsky, Bruce D. Blum, Mariela A. Ajani, Jaffer A. Estrella, Jeannelyn S. Hofstetter, Wayne L. Tzeng, Ching-Wei D. Badgwell, Brian D. Mansfield, Paul F. Ikoma, Naruhiko J Clin Med Article Despite the increasing incidence of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA), the optimal treatment strategy for the disease remains unknown. The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns for GEJA in the United States. The National Cancer Database was searched to identify all patients who underwent resection of the lower esophagus, abdominal esophagus, and/or gastric cardia for GEJA between 2006 and 2016. Patients were grouped by clinical disease stage: early localized (L; T1-2N0), locally advanced (LA; T3-4N0), regional (R; T1-2N+), or regionally advanced (RA; T3-4N+). The search identified 28,852 GEJA patients. The dominant age range was 60–69 years (39%). Most patients were men (85%), and most were white (92%). Most L patients (69%) underwent upfront surgery, whereas most LA, R, and RA patients received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT; 86%, 80%, and 90%, respectively). Among patients who received NAT, 85% received chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant therapy was relatively uncommon across all groups (15–20%). In the LA, R, and RA groups, overall survival was greater in patients who received NAT compared to upfront surgery (p < 0.001). With the exception of patients with early localized node-negative disease, most GEJA patients receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy despite the lack of prospective trials reporting survival benefit over chemotherapy alone. MDPI 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7692279/ /pubmed/33138060 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113495 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Bradford J.
Chiang, Yi-Ju
Das, Prajnan
Minsky, Bruce D.
Blum, Mariela A.
Ajani, Jaffer A.
Estrella, Jeannelyn S.
Hofstetter, Wayne L.
Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
Badgwell, Brian D.
Mansfield, Paul F.
Ikoma, Naruhiko
Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States †
title Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States †
title_full Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States †
title_fullStr Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States †
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States †
title_short Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States †
title_sort treatment patterns for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in the united states †
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33138060
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113495
work_keys_str_mv AT kimbradfordj treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT chiangyiju treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT dasprajnan treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT minskybruced treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT blummarielaa treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT ajanijaffera treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT estrellajeannelyns treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT hofstetterwaynel treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT tzengchingweid treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT badgwellbriand treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT mansfieldpaulf treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates
AT ikomanaruhiko treatmentpatternsforgastroesophagealjunctionadenocarcinomaintheunitedstates