Cargando…

Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Resectioning midline meningiomas of the anterior skull base such as olfactory groove, planum sphenoidale, or tuberculum sellae is challenging, and determining the appropriate approach is important. Based on our experience with midline meningiomas, we propose a decision algorithm for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aftahy, Amir Kaywan, Barz, Melanie, Krauss, Philipp, Wagner, Arthur, Lange, Nicole, Hijazi, Alaa, Wiestler, Benedikt, Meyer, Bernhard, Negwer, Chiara, Gempt, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33153110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113243
_version_ 1783614476800491520
author Aftahy, Amir Kaywan
Barz, Melanie
Krauss, Philipp
Wagner, Arthur
Lange, Nicole
Hijazi, Alaa
Wiestler, Benedikt
Meyer, Bernhard
Negwer, Chiara
Gempt, Jens
author_facet Aftahy, Amir Kaywan
Barz, Melanie
Krauss, Philipp
Wagner, Arthur
Lange, Nicole
Hijazi, Alaa
Wiestler, Benedikt
Meyer, Bernhard
Negwer, Chiara
Gempt, Jens
author_sort Aftahy, Amir Kaywan
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Resectioning midline meningiomas of the anterior skull base such as olfactory groove, planum sphenoidale, or tuberculum sellae is challenging, and determining the appropriate approach is important. Based on our experience with midline meningiomas, we propose a decision algorithm for choosing suitable transcranial approaches. With dichotomizing classic skull bases approaches into median and lateral ones, we display that median approaches provide satisfactory results for olfactory groove meningiomas, whereas lateral approaches enable sufficient exposure of the visual apparatus for planum sphenoidale meningiomas or tuberculum sellae meningiomas. This manuscript aims to point out the sufficiency and feasibility of classic transcranial techniques. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: Midline meningiomas such as olfactory groove (OGMs), planum sphenoidale (PSMs), or tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) are challenging, and determining the appropriate approach is important. We propose a decision algorithm for choosing suitable transcranial approaches. (2) Methods: A retrospective chart review between 06/2007 and 01/2020. Clinical outcomes, radiographic findings, and postoperative complication rates were analyzed with respect to operative approaches. (3) Results: We included 88 patients in the analysis. Of these, 18.2% (16/88) underwent an interhemispheric approach, 72.7% (64/88) underwent a pterional/frontolateral/supraorbital approach, 2.3% (2/88) underwent a unilateral subfrontal approach, and 6.8% (6/88) underwent a bifrontal approach. All OGMs underwent median approaches, along with one PSM. All of the other PSMs and TSMs were resected via lateral approaches. The preoperative tumor volume was ∅20.2 ± 27.1 cm(3). Median approaches had significantly higher tumor volume but also higher rates of Simpson I resection (75.0% vs. 34.4%). An improvement of visual deficits was observed in 34.1% (30/88). The adverse event rate was 17.0%. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (range 0–112 months). (4) Conclusions: Median approaches provides satisfying results for OGMs, lateral approaches enable sufficient exposure of the visual apparatus for PSMs and TSMs. In proposing a simple decision-making algorithm, the authors found that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved for midline meningiomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7692292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76922922020-11-28 Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches Aftahy, Amir Kaywan Barz, Melanie Krauss, Philipp Wagner, Arthur Lange, Nicole Hijazi, Alaa Wiestler, Benedikt Meyer, Bernhard Negwer, Chiara Gempt, Jens Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Resectioning midline meningiomas of the anterior skull base such as olfactory groove, planum sphenoidale, or tuberculum sellae is challenging, and determining the appropriate approach is important. Based on our experience with midline meningiomas, we propose a decision algorithm for choosing suitable transcranial approaches. With dichotomizing classic skull bases approaches into median and lateral ones, we display that median approaches provide satisfactory results for olfactory groove meningiomas, whereas lateral approaches enable sufficient exposure of the visual apparatus for planum sphenoidale meningiomas or tuberculum sellae meningiomas. This manuscript aims to point out the sufficiency and feasibility of classic transcranial techniques. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: Midline meningiomas such as olfactory groove (OGMs), planum sphenoidale (PSMs), or tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) are challenging, and determining the appropriate approach is important. We propose a decision algorithm for choosing suitable transcranial approaches. (2) Methods: A retrospective chart review between 06/2007 and 01/2020. Clinical outcomes, radiographic findings, and postoperative complication rates were analyzed with respect to operative approaches. (3) Results: We included 88 patients in the analysis. Of these, 18.2% (16/88) underwent an interhemispheric approach, 72.7% (64/88) underwent a pterional/frontolateral/supraorbital approach, 2.3% (2/88) underwent a unilateral subfrontal approach, and 6.8% (6/88) underwent a bifrontal approach. All OGMs underwent median approaches, along with one PSM. All of the other PSMs and TSMs were resected via lateral approaches. The preoperative tumor volume was ∅20.2 ± 27.1 cm(3). Median approaches had significantly higher tumor volume but also higher rates of Simpson I resection (75.0% vs. 34.4%). An improvement of visual deficits was observed in 34.1% (30/88). The adverse event rate was 17.0%. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (range 0–112 months). (4) Conclusions: Median approaches provides satisfying results for OGMs, lateral approaches enable sufficient exposure of the visual apparatus for PSMs and TSMs. In proposing a simple decision-making algorithm, the authors found that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved for midline meningiomas. MDPI 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7692292/ /pubmed/33153110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113243 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aftahy, Amir Kaywan
Barz, Melanie
Krauss, Philipp
Wagner, Arthur
Lange, Nicole
Hijazi, Alaa
Wiestler, Benedikt
Meyer, Bernhard
Negwer, Chiara
Gempt, Jens
Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches
title Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches
title_full Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches
title_fullStr Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches
title_short Midline Meningiomas of the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Outcomes and a Decision-Making Algorithm for Classic Skull Base Approaches
title_sort midline meningiomas of the anterior skull base: surgical outcomes and a decision-making algorithm for classic skull base approaches
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33153110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113243
work_keys_str_mv AT aftahyamirkaywan midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT barzmelanie midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT kraussphilipp midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT wagnerarthur midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT langenicole midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT hijazialaa midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT wiestlerbenedikt midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT meyerbernhard midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT negwerchiara midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches
AT gemptjens midlinemeningiomasoftheanteriorskullbasesurgicaloutcomesandadecisionmakingalgorithmforclassicskullbaseapproaches