Cargando…

The Influence of Soil Acidity on the Physiological Responses of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars

The recent study was conducted to examine the influence of acidic soil on the activities of ascorbate (APX) and guaiacol peroxidase (POD), proline, protein as well as malon-dialdehyde (MDA) content, in two commercial spring wheat cultivars (PAN3497 and SST806) at different growth stages (tillering a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tóth, Brigitta, Juhász, Csaba, Labuschagne, Maryke, Moloi, Makoena Joyce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111472
_version_ 1783614497866383360
author Tóth, Brigitta
Juhász, Csaba
Labuschagne, Maryke
Moloi, Makoena Joyce
author_facet Tóth, Brigitta
Juhász, Csaba
Labuschagne, Maryke
Moloi, Makoena Joyce
author_sort Tóth, Brigitta
collection PubMed
description The recent study was conducted to examine the influence of acidic soil on the activities of ascorbate (APX) and guaiacol peroxidase (POD), proline, protein as well as malon-dialdehyde (MDA) content, in two commercial spring wheat cultivars (PAN3497 and SST806) at different growth stages (tillering and grain filling). A cultivar effect was significant only for MDA content, while the treatment effect was highly significant for proline, protein, and MDA. The sampling time effect was significant for most characteristics. MDA, antioxidative capacity, as well as protein content increased with maturity. At grain filling, MDA and proline contents were significantly higher at pH 5 than pH 6 and 7 for both cultivars, with the highest content in SST806. Similarly, SST806 had significantly higher APX and POD when growing at pH 5. There were no significant differences in protein content at grain filling between either genotype or treatments affected by low pH. This study showed that growth stage and soil pH influence the rate of lipid peroxidation as well as the antioxidative capacity of wheat, with a larger effect at grain filling, at pH 5. Although SST806 had higher proline, POD, and APX content than PAN3497 at this growth stage, this coincided with a very high MDA content. This shows that the high antioxidative capacity observed here, was not associated with a reduction of lipid peroxidation under low soil pH. Further research should, therefore, be done to establish the role of the induced antioxidant system in association with growth and yield in wheat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7692381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76923812020-11-28 The Influence of Soil Acidity on the Physiological Responses of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars Tóth, Brigitta Juhász, Csaba Labuschagne, Maryke Moloi, Makoena Joyce Plants (Basel) Article The recent study was conducted to examine the influence of acidic soil on the activities of ascorbate (APX) and guaiacol peroxidase (POD), proline, protein as well as malon-dialdehyde (MDA) content, in two commercial spring wheat cultivars (PAN3497 and SST806) at different growth stages (tillering and grain filling). A cultivar effect was significant only for MDA content, while the treatment effect was highly significant for proline, protein, and MDA. The sampling time effect was significant for most characteristics. MDA, antioxidative capacity, as well as protein content increased with maturity. At grain filling, MDA and proline contents were significantly higher at pH 5 than pH 6 and 7 for both cultivars, with the highest content in SST806. Similarly, SST806 had significantly higher APX and POD when growing at pH 5. There were no significant differences in protein content at grain filling between either genotype or treatments affected by low pH. This study showed that growth stage and soil pH influence the rate of lipid peroxidation as well as the antioxidative capacity of wheat, with a larger effect at grain filling, at pH 5. Although SST806 had higher proline, POD, and APX content than PAN3497 at this growth stage, this coincided with a very high MDA content. This shows that the high antioxidative capacity observed here, was not associated with a reduction of lipid peroxidation under low soil pH. Further research should, therefore, be done to establish the role of the induced antioxidant system in association with growth and yield in wheat. MDPI 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7692381/ /pubmed/33142829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111472 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tóth, Brigitta
Juhász, Csaba
Labuschagne, Maryke
Moloi, Makoena Joyce
The Influence of Soil Acidity on the Physiological Responses of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars
title The Influence of Soil Acidity on the Physiological Responses of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars
title_full The Influence of Soil Acidity on the Physiological Responses of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars
title_fullStr The Influence of Soil Acidity on the Physiological Responses of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Soil Acidity on the Physiological Responses of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars
title_short The Influence of Soil Acidity on the Physiological Responses of Two Bread Wheat Cultivars
title_sort influence of soil acidity on the physiological responses of two bread wheat cultivars
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9111472
work_keys_str_mv AT tothbrigitta theinfluenceofsoilacidityonthephysiologicalresponsesoftwobreadwheatcultivars
AT juhaszcsaba theinfluenceofsoilacidityonthephysiologicalresponsesoftwobreadwheatcultivars
AT labuschagnemaryke theinfluenceofsoilacidityonthephysiologicalresponsesoftwobreadwheatcultivars
AT moloimakoenajoyce theinfluenceofsoilacidityonthephysiologicalresponsesoftwobreadwheatcultivars
AT tothbrigitta influenceofsoilacidityonthephysiologicalresponsesoftwobreadwheatcultivars
AT juhaszcsaba influenceofsoilacidityonthephysiologicalresponsesoftwobreadwheatcultivars
AT labuschagnemaryke influenceofsoilacidityonthephysiologicalresponsesoftwobreadwheatcultivars
AT moloimakoenajoyce influenceofsoilacidityonthephysiologicalresponsesoftwobreadwheatcultivars