Cargando…

Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews

INTRODUCTION: Advocacy is vital for advancing tobacco control and there has been considerable investment in this area. While much is known about tobacco industry interference (TII), there is little research on advocates’ efforts in countering TII and what they need to succeed. We sought to examine t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthes, Britta Katharina, Robertson, Lindsay, Gilmore, Anna B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33243822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710
_version_ 1783614605488029696
author Matthes, Britta Katharina
Robertson, Lindsay
Gilmore, Anna B
author_facet Matthes, Britta Katharina
Robertson, Lindsay
Gilmore, Anna B
author_sort Matthes, Britta Katharina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Advocacy is vital for advancing tobacco control and there has been considerable investment in this area. While much is known about tobacco industry interference (TII), there is little research on advocates’ efforts in countering TII and what they need to succeed. We sought to examine this and focused on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where adoption and implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) tend to remain slower and weaker. METHOD: We interviewed 22 advocates from eight LMICs with recent progress in a tobacco control policy. We explored participants’ experiences in countering TII, including the activities they undertake, challenges they encounter and how their efforts could be enhanced. We used Qualitative Description to analyse transcripts and validated findings through participant feedback. RESULTS: We identified four main areas of countering activities: (1) generating and compiling data and evidence, (2) accessing policymakers and restricting industry access, (3) working with media and (4) engaging in a national coalition. Each area was linked to challenges, including (1) lack of data, (2) no/weak implementation of FCTC Article 5.3, (3) industry ties with media professionals and (4) advocates’ limited capacity. To address these challenges, participants suggested initiatives, including access to country-specific data, building advocates’ skills in compiling and using such data in research and monitoring, and in coalition development; others aiming at training journalists to question and investigate TII; and finally, diverse interventions intended to advance a whole-of-government approach to tobacco control. Structural changes to tobacco control funding and coordination were suggested to facilitate the proposed measures. CONCLUSION: This research highlights that following years of investment in tobacco control in LMICs, there is growing confidence in addressing TII. We identify straightforward initiatives that could strengthen such efforts. This research also underscores that more structural changes to enhance tobacco control capacity building should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7692838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76928382020-12-09 Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews Matthes, Britta Katharina Robertson, Lindsay Gilmore, Anna B BMJ Open Global Health INTRODUCTION: Advocacy is vital for advancing tobacco control and there has been considerable investment in this area. While much is known about tobacco industry interference (TII), there is little research on advocates’ efforts in countering TII and what they need to succeed. We sought to examine this and focused on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where adoption and implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) tend to remain slower and weaker. METHOD: We interviewed 22 advocates from eight LMICs with recent progress in a tobacco control policy. We explored participants’ experiences in countering TII, including the activities they undertake, challenges they encounter and how their efforts could be enhanced. We used Qualitative Description to analyse transcripts and validated findings through participant feedback. RESULTS: We identified four main areas of countering activities: (1) generating and compiling data and evidence, (2) accessing policymakers and restricting industry access, (3) working with media and (4) engaging in a national coalition. Each area was linked to challenges, including (1) lack of data, (2) no/weak implementation of FCTC Article 5.3, (3) industry ties with media professionals and (4) advocates’ limited capacity. To address these challenges, participants suggested initiatives, including access to country-specific data, building advocates’ skills in compiling and using such data in research and monitoring, and in coalition development; others aiming at training journalists to question and investigate TII; and finally, diverse interventions intended to advance a whole-of-government approach to tobacco control. Structural changes to tobacco control funding and coordination were suggested to facilitate the proposed measures. CONCLUSION: This research highlights that following years of investment in tobacco control in LMICs, there is growing confidence in addressing TII. We identify straightforward initiatives that could strengthen such efforts. This research also underscores that more structural changes to enhance tobacco control capacity building should be considered. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7692838/ /pubmed/33243822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global Health
Matthes, Britta Katharina
Robertson, Lindsay
Gilmore, Anna B
Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews
title Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews
title_full Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews
title_fullStr Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews
title_full_unstemmed Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews
title_short Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews
title_sort needs of lmic-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33243822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710
work_keys_str_mv AT matthesbrittakatharina needsoflmicbasedtobaccocontroladvocatestocountertobaccoindustrypolicyinterferenceinsightsfromsemistructuredinterviews
AT robertsonlindsay needsoflmicbasedtobaccocontroladvocatestocountertobaccoindustrypolicyinterferenceinsightsfromsemistructuredinterviews
AT gilmoreannab needsoflmicbasedtobaccocontroladvocatestocountertobaccoindustrypolicyinterferenceinsightsfromsemistructuredinterviews