Cargando…

Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems

Enemy‐risk effects, often referred to as non‐consumptive effects (NCEs), are an important feature of predator–prey ecology, but their significance has had little impact on the conceptual underpinning or practice of biological control. We provide an overview of enemy‐risk effects in predator–prey int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Culshaw‐Maurer, Michael, Sih, Andrew, Rosenheim, Jay A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32902103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13601
_version_ 1783614630618202112
author Culshaw‐Maurer, Michael
Sih, Andrew
Rosenheim, Jay A.
author_facet Culshaw‐Maurer, Michael
Sih, Andrew
Rosenheim, Jay A.
author_sort Culshaw‐Maurer, Michael
collection PubMed
description Enemy‐risk effects, often referred to as non‐consumptive effects (NCEs), are an important feature of predator–prey ecology, but their significance has had little impact on the conceptual underpinning or practice of biological control. We provide an overview of enemy‐risk effects in predator–prey interactions, discuss ways in which risk effects may impact biocontrol programs and suggest avenues for further integration of natural enemy ecology and integrated pest management. Enemy‐risk effects can have important influences on different stages of biological control programs, including natural enemy selection, efficacy testing and quantification of non‐target impacts. Enemy‐risk effects can also shape the interactions of biological control with other pest management practices. Biocontrol systems also provide community ecologists with some of the richest examples of behaviourally mediated trophic cascades and demonstrations of how enemy‐risk effects play out among species with no shared evolutionary history, important topics for invasion biology and conservation. We conclude that the longstanding use of ecological theory by biocontrol practitioners should be expanded to incorporate enemy‐risk effects, and that community ecologists will find many opportunities to study enemy‐risk effects in biocontrol settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7692946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76929462020-12-08 Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems Culshaw‐Maurer, Michael Sih, Andrew Rosenheim, Jay A. Ecol Lett Reviews and Syntheses Enemy‐risk effects, often referred to as non‐consumptive effects (NCEs), are an important feature of predator–prey ecology, but their significance has had little impact on the conceptual underpinning or practice of biological control. We provide an overview of enemy‐risk effects in predator–prey interactions, discuss ways in which risk effects may impact biocontrol programs and suggest avenues for further integration of natural enemy ecology and integrated pest management. Enemy‐risk effects can have important influences on different stages of biological control programs, including natural enemy selection, efficacy testing and quantification of non‐target impacts. Enemy‐risk effects can also shape the interactions of biological control with other pest management practices. Biocontrol systems also provide community ecologists with some of the richest examples of behaviourally mediated trophic cascades and demonstrations of how enemy‐risk effects play out among species with no shared evolutionary history, important topics for invasion biology and conservation. We conclude that the longstanding use of ecological theory by biocontrol practitioners should be expanded to incorporate enemy‐risk effects, and that community ecologists will find many opportunities to study enemy‐risk effects in biocontrol settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-09 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7692946/ /pubmed/32902103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13601 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews and Syntheses
Culshaw‐Maurer, Michael
Sih, Andrew
Rosenheim, Jay A.
Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems
title Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems
title_full Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems
title_fullStr Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems
title_full_unstemmed Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems
title_short Bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems
title_sort bugs scaring bugs: enemy‐risk effects in biological control systems
topic Reviews and Syntheses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32902103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.13601
work_keys_str_mv AT culshawmaurermichael bugsscaringbugsenemyriskeffectsinbiologicalcontrolsystems
AT sihandrew bugsscaringbugsenemyriskeffectsinbiologicalcontrolsystems
AT rosenheimjaya bugsscaringbugsenemyriskeffectsinbiologicalcontrolsystems