Cargando…

Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel drug‐coated balloons (DCB) prevent recurrent claudication after angioplasty, yet data from randomized trials with incomplete follow‐up have raised uncertainty regarding long‐term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on the long‐term safety and e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Peter A., Brodmann, Marianne, Mauri, Laura, Laird, John, Soga, Yoshimitsu, Micari, Antonio, Ansel, Gary, Shishehbor, Mehdi H., Krishnan, Prakash, Gao, Qi, Ouriel, Kenneth, Zeller, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32830913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29152
_version_ 1783614661088772096
author Schneider, Peter A.
Brodmann, Marianne
Mauri, Laura
Laird, John
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Micari, Antonio
Ansel, Gary
Shishehbor, Mehdi H.
Krishnan, Prakash
Gao, Qi
Ouriel, Kenneth
Zeller, Thomas
author_facet Schneider, Peter A.
Brodmann, Marianne
Mauri, Laura
Laird, John
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Micari, Antonio
Ansel, Gary
Shishehbor, Mehdi H.
Krishnan, Prakash
Gao, Qi
Ouriel, Kenneth
Zeller, Thomas
author_sort Schneider, Peter A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel drug‐coated balloons (DCB) prevent recurrent claudication after angioplasty, yet data from randomized trials with incomplete follow‐up have raised uncertainty regarding long‐term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on the long‐term safety and efficacy of angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery lesions in the combined IN.PACT randomized trials. METHODS: The IN.PACT randomized trials (SFA, N = 331 and Japan, N = 100) each compared the DCB with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for claudication, and consented patients for 5 and 3 years, respectively. To address long‐term safety, sites were requested to obtain vital status follow‐up. In the pooled, updated data set, we examined the association between randomized treatment and mortality by cumulative incidence and hazard ratio (HR), and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD‐TLR). Multivariable Cox regression with adjustment for baseline characteristics was used to evaluate the dose effect. Causes of death were adjudicated by a blinded clinical events committee that included oncologists with paclitaxel expertise. RESULTS: The rate of long‐term vital status ascertainment increased from 81% to 97% for DCB and from 85% to 97% for PTA in the IN.PACT SFA trial. The cumulative incidence of mortality was 14.7% DCB versus 12.0% PTA at 5 years, HR 1.39, log‐rank p = .286. Paclitaxel dose (mg) was not an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.02, p = .381), but was an independent predictor of reduced risk of CD‐TLR (HR 0.79; p < .001). Causes of death did not differ by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: In pooled randomized trial data with updated vital status ascertainment, paclitaxel was associated with improved efficacy but was not associated with increased mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7693077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76930772020-12-08 Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials Schneider, Peter A. Brodmann, Marianne Mauri, Laura Laird, John Soga, Yoshimitsu Micari, Antonio Ansel, Gary Shishehbor, Mehdi H. Krishnan, Prakash Gao, Qi Ouriel, Kenneth Zeller, Thomas Catheter Cardiovasc Interv PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel drug‐coated balloons (DCB) prevent recurrent claudication after angioplasty, yet data from randomized trials with incomplete follow‐up have raised uncertainty regarding long‐term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on the long‐term safety and efficacy of angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery lesions in the combined IN.PACT randomized trials. METHODS: The IN.PACT randomized trials (SFA, N = 331 and Japan, N = 100) each compared the DCB with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for claudication, and consented patients for 5 and 3 years, respectively. To address long‐term safety, sites were requested to obtain vital status follow‐up. In the pooled, updated data set, we examined the association between randomized treatment and mortality by cumulative incidence and hazard ratio (HR), and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD‐TLR). Multivariable Cox regression with adjustment for baseline characteristics was used to evaluate the dose effect. Causes of death were adjudicated by a blinded clinical events committee that included oncologists with paclitaxel expertise. RESULTS: The rate of long‐term vital status ascertainment increased from 81% to 97% for DCB and from 85% to 97% for PTA in the IN.PACT SFA trial. The cumulative incidence of mortality was 14.7% DCB versus 12.0% PTA at 5 years, HR 1.39, log‐rank p = .286. Paclitaxel dose (mg) was not an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.02, p = .381), but was an independent predictor of reduced risk of CD‐TLR (HR 0.79; p < .001). Causes of death did not differ by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: In pooled randomized trial data with updated vital status ascertainment, paclitaxel was associated with improved efficacy but was not associated with increased mortality. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-08-24 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7693077/ /pubmed/32830913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29152 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Schneider, Peter A.
Brodmann, Marianne
Mauri, Laura
Laird, John
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Micari, Antonio
Ansel, Gary
Shishehbor, Mehdi H.
Krishnan, Prakash
Gao, Qi
Ouriel, Kenneth
Zeller, Thomas
Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials
title Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials
title_full Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials
title_fullStr Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials
title_full_unstemmed Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials
title_short Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials
title_sort paclitaxel exposure: long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials
topic PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32830913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29152
work_keys_str_mv AT schneiderpetera paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT brodmannmarianne paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT maurilaura paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT lairdjohn paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT sogayoshimitsu paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT micariantonio paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT anselgary paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT shishehbormehdih paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT krishnanprakash paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT gaoqi paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT ourielkenneth paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials
AT zellerthomas paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials