Cargando…
Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials
BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel drug‐coated balloons (DCB) prevent recurrent claudication after angioplasty, yet data from randomized trials with incomplete follow‐up have raised uncertainty regarding long‐term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on the long‐term safety and e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32830913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29152 |
_version_ | 1783614661088772096 |
---|---|
author | Schneider, Peter A. Brodmann, Marianne Mauri, Laura Laird, John Soga, Yoshimitsu Micari, Antonio Ansel, Gary Shishehbor, Mehdi H. Krishnan, Prakash Gao, Qi Ouriel, Kenneth Zeller, Thomas |
author_facet | Schneider, Peter A. Brodmann, Marianne Mauri, Laura Laird, John Soga, Yoshimitsu Micari, Antonio Ansel, Gary Shishehbor, Mehdi H. Krishnan, Prakash Gao, Qi Ouriel, Kenneth Zeller, Thomas |
author_sort | Schneider, Peter A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel drug‐coated balloons (DCB) prevent recurrent claudication after angioplasty, yet data from randomized trials with incomplete follow‐up have raised uncertainty regarding long‐term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on the long‐term safety and efficacy of angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery lesions in the combined IN.PACT randomized trials. METHODS: The IN.PACT randomized trials (SFA, N = 331 and Japan, N = 100) each compared the DCB with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for claudication, and consented patients for 5 and 3 years, respectively. To address long‐term safety, sites were requested to obtain vital status follow‐up. In the pooled, updated data set, we examined the association between randomized treatment and mortality by cumulative incidence and hazard ratio (HR), and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD‐TLR). Multivariable Cox regression with adjustment for baseline characteristics was used to evaluate the dose effect. Causes of death were adjudicated by a blinded clinical events committee that included oncologists with paclitaxel expertise. RESULTS: The rate of long‐term vital status ascertainment increased from 81% to 97% for DCB and from 85% to 97% for PTA in the IN.PACT SFA trial. The cumulative incidence of mortality was 14.7% DCB versus 12.0% PTA at 5 years, HR 1.39, log‐rank p = .286. Paclitaxel dose (mg) was not an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.02, p = .381), but was an independent predictor of reduced risk of CD‐TLR (HR 0.79; p < .001). Causes of death did not differ by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: In pooled randomized trial data with updated vital status ascertainment, paclitaxel was associated with improved efficacy but was not associated with increased mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7693077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76930772020-12-08 Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials Schneider, Peter A. Brodmann, Marianne Mauri, Laura Laird, John Soga, Yoshimitsu Micari, Antonio Ansel, Gary Shishehbor, Mehdi H. Krishnan, Prakash Gao, Qi Ouriel, Kenneth Zeller, Thomas Catheter Cardiovasc Interv PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel drug‐coated balloons (DCB) prevent recurrent claudication after angioplasty, yet data from randomized trials with incomplete follow‐up have raised uncertainty regarding long‐term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on the long‐term safety and efficacy of angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery lesions in the combined IN.PACT randomized trials. METHODS: The IN.PACT randomized trials (SFA, N = 331 and Japan, N = 100) each compared the DCB with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for claudication, and consented patients for 5 and 3 years, respectively. To address long‐term safety, sites were requested to obtain vital status follow‐up. In the pooled, updated data set, we examined the association between randomized treatment and mortality by cumulative incidence and hazard ratio (HR), and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD‐TLR). Multivariable Cox regression with adjustment for baseline characteristics was used to evaluate the dose effect. Causes of death were adjudicated by a blinded clinical events committee that included oncologists with paclitaxel expertise. RESULTS: The rate of long‐term vital status ascertainment increased from 81% to 97% for DCB and from 85% to 97% for PTA in the IN.PACT SFA trial. The cumulative incidence of mortality was 14.7% DCB versus 12.0% PTA at 5 years, HR 1.39, log‐rank p = .286. Paclitaxel dose (mg) was not an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.02, p = .381), but was an independent predictor of reduced risk of CD‐TLR (HR 0.79; p < .001). Causes of death did not differ by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS: In pooled randomized trial data with updated vital status ascertainment, paclitaxel was associated with improved efficacy but was not associated with increased mortality. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-08-24 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7693077/ /pubmed/32830913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29152 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Schneider, Peter A. Brodmann, Marianne Mauri, Laura Laird, John Soga, Yoshimitsu Micari, Antonio Ansel, Gary Shishehbor, Mehdi H. Krishnan, Prakash Gao, Qi Ouriel, Kenneth Zeller, Thomas Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials |
title | Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials |
title_full | Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials |
title_fullStr | Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials |
title_short | Paclitaxel exposure: Long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials |
title_sort | paclitaxel exposure: long‐term safety and effectiveness of a drug‐coated balloon for claudication in pooled randomized trials |
topic | PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32830913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29152 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneiderpetera paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT brodmannmarianne paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT maurilaura paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT lairdjohn paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT sogayoshimitsu paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT micariantonio paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT anselgary paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT shishehbormehdih paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT krishnanprakash paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT gaoqi paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT ourielkenneth paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials AT zellerthomas paclitaxelexposurelongtermsafetyandeffectivenessofadrugcoatedballoonforclaudicationinpooledrandomizedtrials |