Cargando…

Clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs

Highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome in randomized, double‐blind, add‐on, controlled phase 3 trials. It is important to consider the possibility of drug‐drug interactions (DDIs). Here...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patsalos, Philip N., Szaflarski, Jerzy P., Gidal, Barry, VanLandingham, Kevan, Critchley, David, Morrison, Gilmour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32918835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16674
_version_ 1783614689543979008
author Patsalos, Philip N.
Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
Gidal, Barry
VanLandingham, Kevan
Critchley, David
Morrison, Gilmour
author_facet Patsalos, Philip N.
Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
Gidal, Barry
VanLandingham, Kevan
Critchley, David
Morrison, Gilmour
author_sort Patsalos, Philip N.
collection PubMed
description Highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome in randomized, double‐blind, add‐on, controlled phase 3 trials. It is important to consider the possibility of drug‐drug interactions (DDIs). Here, we review six trials of CBD (Epidiolex/Epidyolex; 100 mg/mL oral solution) in healthy volunteers or patients with epilepsy, which investigated potential interactions between CBD and enzymes involved in drug metabolism of common antiseizure drugs (ASDs). CBD did not affect CYP3A4 activity. Induction of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 led to small reductions in exposure to CBD and its major metabolites. Inhibition of CYP3A4 activity did not affect CBD exposure and caused small increases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Inhibition of CYP2C19 activity led to a small increase in exposure to CBD and small decreases in exposure to CBD metabolites. One potentially clinically important DDI was identified: combination of CBD and clobazam (CLB) did not affect CBD or CLB exposure, but increased exposure to major metabolites of both compounds. Reduction of CLB dose may be considered if adverse reactions known to occur with CLB are experienced when it is coadministered with CBD. There was a small increase of exposure to stiripentol (STP) when coadministered with CBD. STP had no effect on CBD exposure but led to minor decreases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Combination of CBD and valproate (VPA) did not cause clinically important changes in the pharmacokinetics of either drug, or 2‐propyl‐4‐pentenoic acid. Concomitant VPA caused small increases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Dose adjustments are not likely to be necessary when CBD is combined with STP or VPA. The safety results from these trials were consistent with the known safety profile of CBD. These trials indicate an overall low potential for DDIs between CBD and other ASDs, except for CLB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7693203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76932032020-12-11 Clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs Patsalos, Philip N. Szaflarski, Jerzy P. Gidal, Barry VanLandingham, Kevan Critchley, David Morrison, Gilmour Epilepsia Critical Review and Invited Commentary Highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome in randomized, double‐blind, add‐on, controlled phase 3 trials. It is important to consider the possibility of drug‐drug interactions (DDIs). Here, we review six trials of CBD (Epidiolex/Epidyolex; 100 mg/mL oral solution) in healthy volunteers or patients with epilepsy, which investigated potential interactions between CBD and enzymes involved in drug metabolism of common antiseizure drugs (ASDs). CBD did not affect CYP3A4 activity. Induction of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 led to small reductions in exposure to CBD and its major metabolites. Inhibition of CYP3A4 activity did not affect CBD exposure and caused small increases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Inhibition of CYP2C19 activity led to a small increase in exposure to CBD and small decreases in exposure to CBD metabolites. One potentially clinically important DDI was identified: combination of CBD and clobazam (CLB) did not affect CBD or CLB exposure, but increased exposure to major metabolites of both compounds. Reduction of CLB dose may be considered if adverse reactions known to occur with CLB are experienced when it is coadministered with CBD. There was a small increase of exposure to stiripentol (STP) when coadministered with CBD. STP had no effect on CBD exposure but led to minor decreases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Combination of CBD and valproate (VPA) did not cause clinically important changes in the pharmacokinetics of either drug, or 2‐propyl‐4‐pentenoic acid. Concomitant VPA caused small increases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Dose adjustments are not likely to be necessary when CBD is combined with STP or VPA. The safety results from these trials were consistent with the known safety profile of CBD. These trials indicate an overall low potential for DDIs between CBD and other ASDs, except for CLB. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-12 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7693203/ /pubmed/32918835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16674 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Critical Review and Invited Commentary
Patsalos, Philip N.
Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
Gidal, Barry
VanLandingham, Kevan
Critchley, David
Morrison, Gilmour
Clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs
title Clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs
title_full Clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs
title_fullStr Clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs
title_full_unstemmed Clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs
title_short Clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs
title_sort clinical implications of trials investigating drug‐drug interactions between cannabidiol and enzyme inducers or inhibitors or common antiseizure drugs
topic Critical Review and Invited Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32918835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16674
work_keys_str_mv AT patsalosphilipn clinicalimplicationsoftrialsinvestigatingdrugdruginteractionsbetweencannabidiolandenzymeinducersorinhibitorsorcommonantiseizuredrugs
AT szaflarskijerzyp clinicalimplicationsoftrialsinvestigatingdrugdruginteractionsbetweencannabidiolandenzymeinducersorinhibitorsorcommonantiseizuredrugs
AT gidalbarry clinicalimplicationsoftrialsinvestigatingdrugdruginteractionsbetweencannabidiolandenzymeinducersorinhibitorsorcommonantiseizuredrugs
AT vanlandinghamkevan clinicalimplicationsoftrialsinvestigatingdrugdruginteractionsbetweencannabidiolandenzymeinducersorinhibitorsorcommonantiseizuredrugs
AT critchleydavid clinicalimplicationsoftrialsinvestigatingdrugdruginteractionsbetweencannabidiolandenzymeinducersorinhibitorsorcommonantiseizuredrugs
AT morrisongilmour clinicalimplicationsoftrialsinvestigatingdrugdruginteractionsbetweencannabidiolandenzymeinducersorinhibitorsorcommonantiseizuredrugs