Cargando…

Performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: For women with ovarian cancer (OC), the optimal screening strategy to identify Lynch syndrome (LS) has not been determined. In the current study, the authors compared the performance characteristics of various strategies combining mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC), microsa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Soyoun Rachel, Tone, Alicia, Kim, Raymond H., Cesari, Matthew, Clarke, Blaise A., Eiriksson, Lua, Hart, Tae, Aronson, Melyssa, Holter, Spring, Lytwyn, Alice, Maganti, Manjula, Oldfield, Leslie, Gallinger, Steven, Bernardini, Marcus Q., Oza, Amit M., Djordjevic, Bojana, Lerner‐Ellis, Jordan, Van de Laar, Emily, Vicus, Danielle, Pugh, Trevor J., Pollett, Aaron, Ferguson, Sarah E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32809219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33144
_version_ 1783614693308366848
author Kim, Soyoun Rachel
Tone, Alicia
Kim, Raymond H.
Cesari, Matthew
Clarke, Blaise A.
Eiriksson, Lua
Hart, Tae
Aronson, Melyssa
Holter, Spring
Lytwyn, Alice
Maganti, Manjula
Oldfield, Leslie
Gallinger, Steven
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Oza, Amit M.
Djordjevic, Bojana
Lerner‐Ellis, Jordan
Van de Laar, Emily
Vicus, Danielle
Pugh, Trevor J.
Pollett, Aaron
Ferguson, Sarah E.
author_facet Kim, Soyoun Rachel
Tone, Alicia
Kim, Raymond H.
Cesari, Matthew
Clarke, Blaise A.
Eiriksson, Lua
Hart, Tae
Aronson, Melyssa
Holter, Spring
Lytwyn, Alice
Maganti, Manjula
Oldfield, Leslie
Gallinger, Steven
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Oza, Amit M.
Djordjevic, Bojana
Lerner‐Ellis, Jordan
Van de Laar, Emily
Vicus, Danielle
Pugh, Trevor J.
Pollett, Aaron
Ferguson, Sarah E.
author_sort Kim, Soyoun Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For women with ovarian cancer (OC), the optimal screening strategy to identify Lynch syndrome (LS) has not been determined. In the current study, the authors compared the performance characteristics of various strategies combining mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC), microsatellite instability testing (MSI), and family history for the detection of LS. METHODS: Women with nonserous and/or nonmucinous ovarian cancer were recruited prospectively from 3 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. All underwent germline testing for LS and completed a family history assessment. Tumors were assessed using MMR IHC and MSI. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of screening strategies were compared with the gold standard of a germline result. RESULTS: Of 215 women, germline data were available for 189 (88%); 13 women (7%) had pathogenic germline variants with 7 women with mutS homolog 6 (MSH6); 3 women with mutL homolog 1 (MLH1); 2 women with PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component (PMS2); and 1 woman with mutS homolog 2 (MSH2). A total of 28 women had MMR‐deficient tumors (13%); of these, 11 had pathogenic variants (39%). Sequential IHC (with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis on MLH1‐deficient tumors) followed by MSI for nonmethylated and/or MMR‐intact patients was the most sensitive (92.3%; 95% confidence interval, 64%‐99.8%) and specific (97.7%; 95% confidence interval, 94.2%‐99.4%) approach, missing 1 case of LS. IHC with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis missed 2 patients of LS. Family history was found to have the lowest sensitivity at 55%. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential IHC (with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis) followed by MSI was found to be most sensitive. However, IHC with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis also performed well and is likely more cost‐effective and efficient in the clinical setting. The pretest probability of LS is high in patients with MMR deficiency and warrants universal screening for LS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7693219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76932192020-12-11 Performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer Kim, Soyoun Rachel Tone, Alicia Kim, Raymond H. Cesari, Matthew Clarke, Blaise A. Eiriksson, Lua Hart, Tae Aronson, Melyssa Holter, Spring Lytwyn, Alice Maganti, Manjula Oldfield, Leslie Gallinger, Steven Bernardini, Marcus Q. Oza, Amit M. Djordjevic, Bojana Lerner‐Ellis, Jordan Van de Laar, Emily Vicus, Danielle Pugh, Trevor J. Pollett, Aaron Ferguson, Sarah E. Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: For women with ovarian cancer (OC), the optimal screening strategy to identify Lynch syndrome (LS) has not been determined. In the current study, the authors compared the performance characteristics of various strategies combining mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC), microsatellite instability testing (MSI), and family history for the detection of LS. METHODS: Women with nonserous and/or nonmucinous ovarian cancer were recruited prospectively from 3 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. All underwent germline testing for LS and completed a family history assessment. Tumors were assessed using MMR IHC and MSI. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of screening strategies were compared with the gold standard of a germline result. RESULTS: Of 215 women, germline data were available for 189 (88%); 13 women (7%) had pathogenic germline variants with 7 women with mutS homolog 6 (MSH6); 3 women with mutL homolog 1 (MLH1); 2 women with PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component (PMS2); and 1 woman with mutS homolog 2 (MSH2). A total of 28 women had MMR‐deficient tumors (13%); of these, 11 had pathogenic variants (39%). Sequential IHC (with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis on MLH1‐deficient tumors) followed by MSI for nonmethylated and/or MMR‐intact patients was the most sensitive (92.3%; 95% confidence interval, 64%‐99.8%) and specific (97.7%; 95% confidence interval, 94.2%‐99.4%) approach, missing 1 case of LS. IHC with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis missed 2 patients of LS. Family history was found to have the lowest sensitivity at 55%. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential IHC (with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis) followed by MSI was found to be most sensitive. However, IHC with MLH1 promoter methylation analysis also performed well and is likely more cost‐effective and efficient in the clinical setting. The pretest probability of LS is high in patients with MMR deficiency and warrants universal screening for LS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-18 2020-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7693219/ /pubmed/32809219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33144 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kim, Soyoun Rachel
Tone, Alicia
Kim, Raymond H.
Cesari, Matthew
Clarke, Blaise A.
Eiriksson, Lua
Hart, Tae
Aronson, Melyssa
Holter, Spring
Lytwyn, Alice
Maganti, Manjula
Oldfield, Leslie
Gallinger, Steven
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Oza, Amit M.
Djordjevic, Bojana
Lerner‐Ellis, Jordan
Van de Laar, Emily
Vicus, Danielle
Pugh, Trevor J.
Pollett, Aaron
Ferguson, Sarah E.
Performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer
title Performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer
title_full Performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer
title_short Performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer
title_sort performance characteristics of screening strategies to identify lynch syndrome in women with ovarian cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32809219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33144
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsoyounrachel performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT tonealicia performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT kimraymondh performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT cesarimatthew performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT clarkeblaisea performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT eirikssonlua performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT harttae performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT aronsonmelyssa performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT holterspring performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT lytwynalice performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT magantimanjula performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT oldfieldleslie performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT gallingersteven performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT bernardinimarcusq performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT ozaamitm performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT djordjevicbojana performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT lernerellisjordan performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT vandelaaremily performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT vicusdanielle performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT pughtrevorj performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT pollettaaron performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer
AT fergusonsarahe performancecharacteristicsofscreeningstrategiestoidentifylynchsyndromeinwomenwithovariancancer