Cargando…
Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory
In the present study, we employed the dual task technique to explore the role of language in topographical working memory when landmarks are present along the path. We performed three experiments to mainly test the effects of language but also motor, spatial motor and spatial environment interferenc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33147855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110811 |
_version_ | 1783614739836829696 |
---|---|
author | Piccardi, Laura Bocchi, Alessia Palmiero, Massimiliano Boccia, Maddalena D’Amico, Simonetta Nori, Raffaella |
author_facet | Piccardi, Laura Bocchi, Alessia Palmiero, Massimiliano Boccia, Maddalena D’Amico, Simonetta Nori, Raffaella |
author_sort | Piccardi, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present study, we employed the dual task technique to explore the role of language in topographical working memory when landmarks are present along the path. We performed three experiments to mainly test the effects of language but also motor, spatial motor and spatial environment interferences on topographical working memory. We aimed to clarify both the role of language in navigational working memory per se and the extent to which spatial language interferes with the main task more than the other types of interference. Specifically, in the three experiments we investigated the differences due to different verbal interference sources (i.e., articulatory suppression of nonsense syllables; right and left, up and bottom; and north, south, east and west). The main hypothesis was that the use of spatial language affected more landmark-based topographical working memory than both the verbalization of nonsense syllables and other types of interference. Results show no effect of spatial language, only spatial environmental interference affected the navigational working memory performance. In general, this might depend on the scarce role of spatial language in online navigational working memory tasks. Specifically, language is more important for learning and retrieval of the cognitive map. Implications and future research directions are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7693419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76934192020-11-28 Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory Piccardi, Laura Bocchi, Alessia Palmiero, Massimiliano Boccia, Maddalena D’Amico, Simonetta Nori, Raffaella Brain Sci Article In the present study, we employed the dual task technique to explore the role of language in topographical working memory when landmarks are present along the path. We performed three experiments to mainly test the effects of language but also motor, spatial motor and spatial environment interferences on topographical working memory. We aimed to clarify both the role of language in navigational working memory per se and the extent to which spatial language interferes with the main task more than the other types of interference. Specifically, in the three experiments we investigated the differences due to different verbal interference sources (i.e., articulatory suppression of nonsense syllables; right and left, up and bottom; and north, south, east and west). The main hypothesis was that the use of spatial language affected more landmark-based topographical working memory than both the verbalization of nonsense syllables and other types of interference. Results show no effect of spatial language, only spatial environmental interference affected the navigational working memory performance. In general, this might depend on the scarce role of spatial language in online navigational working memory tasks. Specifically, language is more important for learning and retrieval of the cognitive map. Implications and future research directions are discussed. MDPI 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7693419/ /pubmed/33147855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110811 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Piccardi, Laura Bocchi, Alessia Palmiero, Massimiliano Boccia, Maddalena D’Amico, Simonetta Nori, Raffaella Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory |
title | Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory |
title_full | Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory |
title_fullStr | Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory |
title_full_unstemmed | Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory |
title_short | Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory |
title_sort | chatting while walking does not interfere with topographical working memory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33147855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piccardilaura chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory AT bocchialessia chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory AT palmieromassimiliano chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory AT bocciamaddalena chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory AT damicosimonetta chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory AT noriraffaella chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory |