Cargando…

Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory

In the present study, we employed the dual task technique to explore the role of language in topographical working memory when landmarks are present along the path. We performed three experiments to mainly test the effects of language but also motor, spatial motor and spatial environment interferenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piccardi, Laura, Bocchi, Alessia, Palmiero, Massimiliano, Boccia, Maddalena, D’Amico, Simonetta, Nori, Raffaella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33147855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110811
_version_ 1783614739836829696
author Piccardi, Laura
Bocchi, Alessia
Palmiero, Massimiliano
Boccia, Maddalena
D’Amico, Simonetta
Nori, Raffaella
author_facet Piccardi, Laura
Bocchi, Alessia
Palmiero, Massimiliano
Boccia, Maddalena
D’Amico, Simonetta
Nori, Raffaella
author_sort Piccardi, Laura
collection PubMed
description In the present study, we employed the dual task technique to explore the role of language in topographical working memory when landmarks are present along the path. We performed three experiments to mainly test the effects of language but also motor, spatial motor and spatial environment interferences on topographical working memory. We aimed to clarify both the role of language in navigational working memory per se and the extent to which spatial language interferes with the main task more than the other types of interference. Specifically, in the three experiments we investigated the differences due to different verbal interference sources (i.e., articulatory suppression of nonsense syllables; right and left, up and bottom; and north, south, east and west). The main hypothesis was that the use of spatial language affected more landmark-based topographical working memory than both the verbalization of nonsense syllables and other types of interference. Results show no effect of spatial language, only spatial environmental interference affected the navigational working memory performance. In general, this might depend on the scarce role of spatial language in online navigational working memory tasks. Specifically, language is more important for learning and retrieval of the cognitive map. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7693419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76934192020-11-28 Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory Piccardi, Laura Bocchi, Alessia Palmiero, Massimiliano Boccia, Maddalena D’Amico, Simonetta Nori, Raffaella Brain Sci Article In the present study, we employed the dual task technique to explore the role of language in topographical working memory when landmarks are present along the path. We performed three experiments to mainly test the effects of language but also motor, spatial motor and spatial environment interferences on topographical working memory. We aimed to clarify both the role of language in navigational working memory per se and the extent to which spatial language interferes with the main task more than the other types of interference. Specifically, in the three experiments we investigated the differences due to different verbal interference sources (i.e., articulatory suppression of nonsense syllables; right and left, up and bottom; and north, south, east and west). The main hypothesis was that the use of spatial language affected more landmark-based topographical working memory than both the verbalization of nonsense syllables and other types of interference. Results show no effect of spatial language, only spatial environmental interference affected the navigational working memory performance. In general, this might depend on the scarce role of spatial language in online navigational working memory tasks. Specifically, language is more important for learning and retrieval of the cognitive map. Implications and future research directions are discussed. MDPI 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7693419/ /pubmed/33147855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110811 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Piccardi, Laura
Bocchi, Alessia
Palmiero, Massimiliano
Boccia, Maddalena
D’Amico, Simonetta
Nori, Raffaella
Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory
title Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory
title_full Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory
title_fullStr Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory
title_full_unstemmed Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory
title_short Chatting While Walking Does Not Interfere with Topographical Working Memory
title_sort chatting while walking does not interfere with topographical working memory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33147855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110811
work_keys_str_mv AT piccardilaura chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory
AT bocchialessia chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory
AT palmieromassimiliano chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory
AT bocciamaddalena chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory
AT damicosimonetta chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory
AT noriraffaella chattingwhilewalkingdoesnotinterferewithtopographicalworkingmemory