Cargando…

Targeting CREB in Cancer Therapy: A Key Candidate or One of Many? An Update

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Only 5% of all drug-related targets currently move from preclinical to clinical in cancer, and just some of them achieve patient’s bedside. Among others, intratumor heterogeneity and preclinical cancer model limitations actually represent the main reasons for this failure. Cyclic-AMP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sapio, Luigi, Salzillo, Alessia, Ragone, Angela, Illiano, Michela, Spina, Annamaria, Naviglio, Silvio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113166
_version_ 1783614786387312640
author Sapio, Luigi
Salzillo, Alessia
Ragone, Angela
Illiano, Michela
Spina, Annamaria
Naviglio, Silvio
author_facet Sapio, Luigi
Salzillo, Alessia
Ragone, Angela
Illiano, Michela
Spina, Annamaria
Naviglio, Silvio
author_sort Sapio, Luigi
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Only 5% of all drug-related targets currently move from preclinical to clinical in cancer, and just some of them achieve patient’s bedside. Among others, intratumor heterogeneity and preclinical cancer model limitations actually represent the main reasons for this failure. Cyclic-AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) has been defined as a proto-oncogene in different tumor types, being involved in maintenance and progression. Due to its relevance in tumor pathophysiology, many CREB inhibitor compounds have been developed and tested over the years. Herein, we examine the current state-of-the-art of both CREB and CREB inhibitors in cancer, retracing some of the most significant findings of the last years. While the scientific statement confers on CREB a proactive role in cancer, its therapeutic potential is still stuck at laboratory bench. Therefore, pursuing every concrete result to achieve CREB inhibition in clinical might give chance and future to cancer patients worldwide. ABSTRACT: Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is considered the major disorienting factor in cancer treatment. As a result of stochastic genetic and epigenetic alterations, the appearance of a branched evolutionary shape confers tumor plasticity, causing relapse and unfavorable clinical prognosis. The growing evidence in cancer discovery presents to us “the great paradox” consisting of countless potential targets constantly discovered and a small number of candidates being effective in human patients. Among these, cyclic-AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) has been proposed as proto-oncogene supporting tumor initiation, progression and metastasis. Overexpression and hyperactivation of CREB are frequently observed in cancer, whereas genetic and pharmacological CREB downregulation affects proliferation and apoptosis. Notably, the present review is designed to investigate the feasibility of targeting CREB in cancer therapy. In particular, starting with the latest CREB evidence in cancer pathophysiology, we evaluate the advancement state of CREB inhibitor design, including the histone lysine demethylases JMJD3/UTX inhibitor GSKJ4 that we newly identified as a promising CREB modulator in leukemia cells. Moreover, an accurate analysis of strengths and weaknesses is also conducted to figure out whether CREB can actually represent a therapeutic candidate or just one of the innumerable preclinical cancer targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7693618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76936182020-11-28 Targeting CREB in Cancer Therapy: A Key Candidate or One of Many? An Update Sapio, Luigi Salzillo, Alessia Ragone, Angela Illiano, Michela Spina, Annamaria Naviglio, Silvio Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Only 5% of all drug-related targets currently move from preclinical to clinical in cancer, and just some of them achieve patient’s bedside. Among others, intratumor heterogeneity and preclinical cancer model limitations actually represent the main reasons for this failure. Cyclic-AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) has been defined as a proto-oncogene in different tumor types, being involved in maintenance and progression. Due to its relevance in tumor pathophysiology, many CREB inhibitor compounds have been developed and tested over the years. Herein, we examine the current state-of-the-art of both CREB and CREB inhibitors in cancer, retracing some of the most significant findings of the last years. While the scientific statement confers on CREB a proactive role in cancer, its therapeutic potential is still stuck at laboratory bench. Therefore, pursuing every concrete result to achieve CREB inhibition in clinical might give chance and future to cancer patients worldwide. ABSTRACT: Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is considered the major disorienting factor in cancer treatment. As a result of stochastic genetic and epigenetic alterations, the appearance of a branched evolutionary shape confers tumor plasticity, causing relapse and unfavorable clinical prognosis. The growing evidence in cancer discovery presents to us “the great paradox” consisting of countless potential targets constantly discovered and a small number of candidates being effective in human patients. Among these, cyclic-AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) has been proposed as proto-oncogene supporting tumor initiation, progression and metastasis. Overexpression and hyperactivation of CREB are frequently observed in cancer, whereas genetic and pharmacological CREB downregulation affects proliferation and apoptosis. Notably, the present review is designed to investigate the feasibility of targeting CREB in cancer therapy. In particular, starting with the latest CREB evidence in cancer pathophysiology, we evaluate the advancement state of CREB inhibitor design, including the histone lysine demethylases JMJD3/UTX inhibitor GSKJ4 that we newly identified as a promising CREB modulator in leukemia cells. Moreover, an accurate analysis of strengths and weaknesses is also conducted to figure out whether CREB can actually represent a therapeutic candidate or just one of the innumerable preclinical cancer targets. MDPI 2020-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7693618/ /pubmed/33126560 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113166 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sapio, Luigi
Salzillo, Alessia
Ragone, Angela
Illiano, Michela
Spina, Annamaria
Naviglio, Silvio
Targeting CREB in Cancer Therapy: A Key Candidate or One of Many? An Update
title Targeting CREB in Cancer Therapy: A Key Candidate or One of Many? An Update
title_full Targeting CREB in Cancer Therapy: A Key Candidate or One of Many? An Update
title_fullStr Targeting CREB in Cancer Therapy: A Key Candidate or One of Many? An Update
title_full_unstemmed Targeting CREB in Cancer Therapy: A Key Candidate or One of Many? An Update
title_short Targeting CREB in Cancer Therapy: A Key Candidate or One of Many? An Update
title_sort targeting creb in cancer therapy: a key candidate or one of many? an update
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33126560
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113166
work_keys_str_mv AT sapioluigi targetingcrebincancertherapyakeycandidateoroneofmanyanupdate
AT salzilloalessia targetingcrebincancertherapyakeycandidateoroneofmanyanupdate
AT ragoneangela targetingcrebincancertherapyakeycandidateoroneofmanyanupdate
AT illianomichela targetingcrebincancertherapyakeycandidateoroneofmanyanupdate
AT spinaannamaria targetingcrebincancertherapyakeycandidateoroneofmanyanupdate
AT navigliosilvio targetingcrebincancertherapyakeycandidateoroneofmanyanupdate