Cargando…

The Impact on Outcome by Adding Bevacizumab to Standard Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Mesothelioma Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis

OBJECTIVES: Adding bevacizumab, an anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), to platinum-based chemotherapy/pemetrexed in 1(st) line treatment of advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), significantly improved overall survival. However, increased high grade bleeding after operation was r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauk, Olivia, Bruestle, Karina, Neuer, Thomas, Battilana, Bianca, Nguyen, Thi Dan Linh, Frauenfelder, Thomas, Stahel, Rolf, Weder, Walter, Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra, Opitz, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.588563
_version_ 1783614789703958528
author Lauk, Olivia
Bruestle, Karina
Neuer, Thomas
Battilana, Bianca
Nguyen, Thi Dan Linh
Frauenfelder, Thomas
Stahel, Rolf
Weder, Walter
Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra
Opitz, Isabelle
author_facet Lauk, Olivia
Bruestle, Karina
Neuer, Thomas
Battilana, Bianca
Nguyen, Thi Dan Linh
Frauenfelder, Thomas
Stahel, Rolf
Weder, Walter
Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra
Opitz, Isabelle
author_sort Lauk, Olivia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Adding bevacizumab, an anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), to platinum-based chemotherapy/pemetrexed in 1(st) line treatment of advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), significantly improved overall survival. However, increased high grade bleeding after operation was reported in patients with colorectal cancer who previously received bevacizumab. In the present analysis, we assessed for the first time the impact of adding bevacizumab to induction chemotherapy prior to surgery for mesothelioma patients. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-seven MPM patients, intended to be treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery at the University Hospital of Zurich between 2002 and December 2018, were included in the present analysis. After propensity score matching for gender, histology and age (1:3 ratio), data from 88 patients were analyzed. Sixty-six patients underwent induction chemotherapy (with cis-/carboplatin and pemetrexed: control group) alone and 22 patients underwent induction chemotherapy with the addition of bevacizumab (bevacizumab group) prior macroscopic complete resection (MCR). Perioperative and long-term outcome variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients undergoing combination treatment with bevacizumab had a significantly better response than with chemotherapy alone as assessed by modified RECIST (p=0.046). Intraoperative complications in the bevacizumab group (one patient), or in the control group (three patients) were not related to intraoperative bleeding. Postoperative transfusion of blood products occurred in a larger amount in the control group than in the bevacizumab group (p=0.047). Overall survival was not statistically different between both groups. CONCLUSION: These initial data demonstrate that MCR can be performed safely after triple induction chemotherapy with bevacizumab without increased intra- and postoperative bleeding complications. Response rates were significantly improved by the addition of bevacizumab.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7693632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76936322020-12-09 The Impact on Outcome by Adding Bevacizumab to Standard Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Mesothelioma Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis Lauk, Olivia Bruestle, Karina Neuer, Thomas Battilana, Bianca Nguyen, Thi Dan Linh Frauenfelder, Thomas Stahel, Rolf Weder, Walter Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Opitz, Isabelle Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: Adding bevacizumab, an anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), to platinum-based chemotherapy/pemetrexed in 1(st) line treatment of advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), significantly improved overall survival. However, increased high grade bleeding after operation was reported in patients with colorectal cancer who previously received bevacizumab. In the present analysis, we assessed for the first time the impact of adding bevacizumab to induction chemotherapy prior to surgery for mesothelioma patients. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-seven MPM patients, intended to be treated with induction chemotherapy followed by surgery at the University Hospital of Zurich between 2002 and December 2018, were included in the present analysis. After propensity score matching for gender, histology and age (1:3 ratio), data from 88 patients were analyzed. Sixty-six patients underwent induction chemotherapy (with cis-/carboplatin and pemetrexed: control group) alone and 22 patients underwent induction chemotherapy with the addition of bevacizumab (bevacizumab group) prior macroscopic complete resection (MCR). Perioperative and long-term outcome variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients undergoing combination treatment with bevacizumab had a significantly better response than with chemotherapy alone as assessed by modified RECIST (p=0.046). Intraoperative complications in the bevacizumab group (one patient), or in the control group (three patients) were not related to intraoperative bleeding. Postoperative transfusion of blood products occurred in a larger amount in the control group than in the bevacizumab group (p=0.047). Overall survival was not statistically different between both groups. CONCLUSION: These initial data demonstrate that MCR can be performed safely after triple induction chemotherapy with bevacizumab without increased intra- and postoperative bleeding complications. Response rates were significantly improved by the addition of bevacizumab. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7693632/ /pubmed/33304848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.588563 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lauk, Bruestle, Neuer, Battilana, Nguyen, Frauenfelder, Stahel, Weder, Curioni-Fontecedro and Opitz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Lauk, Olivia
Bruestle, Karina
Neuer, Thomas
Battilana, Bianca
Nguyen, Thi Dan Linh
Frauenfelder, Thomas
Stahel, Rolf
Weder, Walter
Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra
Opitz, Isabelle
The Impact on Outcome by Adding Bevacizumab to Standard Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Mesothelioma Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title The Impact on Outcome by Adding Bevacizumab to Standard Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Mesothelioma Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_full The Impact on Outcome by Adding Bevacizumab to Standard Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Mesothelioma Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_fullStr The Impact on Outcome by Adding Bevacizumab to Standard Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Mesothelioma Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Impact on Outcome by Adding Bevacizumab to Standard Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Mesothelioma Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_short The Impact on Outcome by Adding Bevacizumab to Standard Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Mesothelioma Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis
title_sort impact on outcome by adding bevacizumab to standard induction chemotherapy prior to mesothelioma surgery: a retrospective single center analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.588563
work_keys_str_mv AT laukolivia theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT bruestlekarina theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT neuerthomas theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT battilanabianca theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT nguyenthidanlinh theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT frauenfelderthomas theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT stahelrolf theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT wederwalter theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT curionifontecedroalessandra theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT opitzisabelle theimpactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT laukolivia impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT bruestlekarina impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT neuerthomas impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT battilanabianca impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT nguyenthidanlinh impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT frauenfelderthomas impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT stahelrolf impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT wederwalter impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT curionifontecedroalessandra impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis
AT opitzisabelle impactonoutcomebyaddingbevacizumabtostandardinductionchemotherapypriortomesotheliomasurgeryaretrospectivesinglecenteranalysis