Cargando…
The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training
Some controversy exists as to the most efficacious method of training to achieve enhanced levels of sport performance. Controversy concerning the efficacy of periodization and especially block periodization (BP) likely stems from the use of poorly or untrained subjects versus trained who may differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8110145 |
_version_ | 1783614835166019584 |
---|---|
author | Wetmore, Alexander B. Moquin, Paul A. Carroll, Kevin M. Fry, Andrew C. Hornsby, W. Guy Stone, Michael H. |
author_facet | Wetmore, Alexander B. Moquin, Paul A. Carroll, Kevin M. Fry, Andrew C. Hornsby, W. Guy Stone, Michael H. |
author_sort | Wetmore, Alexander B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some controversy exists as to the most efficacious method of training to achieve enhanced levels of sport performance. Controversy concerning the efficacy of periodization and especially block periodization (BP) likely stems from the use of poorly or untrained subjects versus trained who may differ in their responses to a stimulus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of training status on performance outcomes resulting from 11 weeks of BP training. Fifteen males were recruited for this study and placed into strong (age = 24.3 ± 1.9 years., body mass (BM) = 87.7 ± 8.7 kg, squat: body mass = 1.96 ± 0.16), moderate (age = 25.3 ± 2.7 years., body mass = 100.2 ± 15.5 kg, squat: body mass = 1.46 ± 0.14), or weak (age = 23.2 ± 3.9 yrs., body mass = 83.5 ± 17.1 kg, squat: body mass = 1.17 ± 0.07) groups based on relative strength. Testing was completed at baseline, and after each block which consisted of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) squat, 0 kg static jump (SJ), 0 kg countermovement jump (CMJ), 20 kg SJ, and 20 kg CMJ. Absolute and relative strength were strongly correlated with rates of improvement for absolute strength, relative strength, 0 kg, and 20 kg vertical jumps. All subjects substantially improved back squat (p < 0.001), relative back squat (p < 0.001) with large–very large effect sizes between groups for percent change favoring the weak group over the moderate and strong group for all performance variables. All subjects showed statistically significant improvements in 0 kg SJ (p < 0.001), 0 kg CMJ (p < 0.001), 20 kg SJ (p = 0.002), and 20 kg CMJ (p < 0.001). Statistically significant between group differences were noted for both 20 kg SJ (p = 0.01) and 20 kg CMJ (p = 0.043) with the strong group statistically greater jump heights than the weak group. The results of this study indicate BP training is effective in improving strength and explosive ability. Additionally, training status may substantially alter the response to a resistance training program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7693826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76938262020-11-28 The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training Wetmore, Alexander B. Moquin, Paul A. Carroll, Kevin M. Fry, Andrew C. Hornsby, W. Guy Stone, Michael H. Sports (Basel) Article Some controversy exists as to the most efficacious method of training to achieve enhanced levels of sport performance. Controversy concerning the efficacy of periodization and especially block periodization (BP) likely stems from the use of poorly or untrained subjects versus trained who may differ in their responses to a stimulus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of training status on performance outcomes resulting from 11 weeks of BP training. Fifteen males were recruited for this study and placed into strong (age = 24.3 ± 1.9 years., body mass (BM) = 87.7 ± 8.7 kg, squat: body mass = 1.96 ± 0.16), moderate (age = 25.3 ± 2.7 years., body mass = 100.2 ± 15.5 kg, squat: body mass = 1.46 ± 0.14), or weak (age = 23.2 ± 3.9 yrs., body mass = 83.5 ± 17.1 kg, squat: body mass = 1.17 ± 0.07) groups based on relative strength. Testing was completed at baseline, and after each block which consisted of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) squat, 0 kg static jump (SJ), 0 kg countermovement jump (CMJ), 20 kg SJ, and 20 kg CMJ. Absolute and relative strength were strongly correlated with rates of improvement for absolute strength, relative strength, 0 kg, and 20 kg vertical jumps. All subjects substantially improved back squat (p < 0.001), relative back squat (p < 0.001) with large–very large effect sizes between groups for percent change favoring the weak group over the moderate and strong group for all performance variables. All subjects showed statistically significant improvements in 0 kg SJ (p < 0.001), 0 kg CMJ (p < 0.001), 20 kg SJ (p = 0.002), and 20 kg CMJ (p < 0.001). Statistically significant between group differences were noted for both 20 kg SJ (p = 0.01) and 20 kg CMJ (p = 0.043) with the strong group statistically greater jump heights than the weak group. The results of this study indicate BP training is effective in improving strength and explosive ability. Additionally, training status may substantially alter the response to a resistance training program. MDPI 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7693826/ /pubmed/33142849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8110145 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wetmore, Alexander B. Moquin, Paul A. Carroll, Kevin M. Fry, Andrew C. Hornsby, W. Guy Stone, Michael H. The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training |
title | The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training |
title_full | The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training |
title_short | The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training |
title_sort | effect of training status on adaptations to 11 weeks of block periodization training |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8110145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wetmorealexanderb theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT moquinpaula theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT carrollkevinm theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT fryandrewc theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT hornsbywguy theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT stonemichaelh theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT wetmorealexanderb effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT moquinpaula effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT carrollkevinm effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT fryandrewc effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT hornsbywguy effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining AT stonemichaelh effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining |