Cargando…

The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training

Some controversy exists as to the most efficacious method of training to achieve enhanced levels of sport performance. Controversy concerning the efficacy of periodization and especially block periodization (BP) likely stems from the use of poorly or untrained subjects versus trained who may differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wetmore, Alexander B., Moquin, Paul A., Carroll, Kevin M., Fry, Andrew C., Hornsby, W. Guy, Stone, Michael H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8110145
_version_ 1783614835166019584
author Wetmore, Alexander B.
Moquin, Paul A.
Carroll, Kevin M.
Fry, Andrew C.
Hornsby, W. Guy
Stone, Michael H.
author_facet Wetmore, Alexander B.
Moquin, Paul A.
Carroll, Kevin M.
Fry, Andrew C.
Hornsby, W. Guy
Stone, Michael H.
author_sort Wetmore, Alexander B.
collection PubMed
description Some controversy exists as to the most efficacious method of training to achieve enhanced levels of sport performance. Controversy concerning the efficacy of periodization and especially block periodization (BP) likely stems from the use of poorly or untrained subjects versus trained who may differ in their responses to a stimulus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of training status on performance outcomes resulting from 11 weeks of BP training. Fifteen males were recruited for this study and placed into strong (age = 24.3 ± 1.9 years., body mass (BM) = 87.7 ± 8.7 kg, squat: body mass = 1.96 ± 0.16), moderate (age = 25.3 ± 2.7 years., body mass = 100.2 ± 15.5 kg, squat: body mass = 1.46 ± 0.14), or weak (age = 23.2 ± 3.9 yrs., body mass = 83.5 ± 17.1 kg, squat: body mass = 1.17 ± 0.07) groups based on relative strength. Testing was completed at baseline, and after each block which consisted of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) squat, 0 kg static jump (SJ), 0 kg countermovement jump (CMJ), 20 kg SJ, and 20 kg CMJ. Absolute and relative strength were strongly correlated with rates of improvement for absolute strength, relative strength, 0 kg, and 20 kg vertical jumps. All subjects substantially improved back squat (p < 0.001), relative back squat (p < 0.001) with large–very large effect sizes between groups for percent change favoring the weak group over the moderate and strong group for all performance variables. All subjects showed statistically significant improvements in 0 kg SJ (p < 0.001), 0 kg CMJ (p < 0.001), 20 kg SJ (p = 0.002), and 20 kg CMJ (p < 0.001). Statistically significant between group differences were noted for both 20 kg SJ (p = 0.01) and 20 kg CMJ (p = 0.043) with the strong group statistically greater jump heights than the weak group. The results of this study indicate BP training is effective in improving strength and explosive ability. Additionally, training status may substantially alter the response to a resistance training program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7693826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76938262020-11-28 The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training Wetmore, Alexander B. Moquin, Paul A. Carroll, Kevin M. Fry, Andrew C. Hornsby, W. Guy Stone, Michael H. Sports (Basel) Article Some controversy exists as to the most efficacious method of training to achieve enhanced levels of sport performance. Controversy concerning the efficacy of periodization and especially block periodization (BP) likely stems from the use of poorly or untrained subjects versus trained who may differ in their responses to a stimulus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of training status on performance outcomes resulting from 11 weeks of BP training. Fifteen males were recruited for this study and placed into strong (age = 24.3 ± 1.9 years., body mass (BM) = 87.7 ± 8.7 kg, squat: body mass = 1.96 ± 0.16), moderate (age = 25.3 ± 2.7 years., body mass = 100.2 ± 15.5 kg, squat: body mass = 1.46 ± 0.14), or weak (age = 23.2 ± 3.9 yrs., body mass = 83.5 ± 17.1 kg, squat: body mass = 1.17 ± 0.07) groups based on relative strength. Testing was completed at baseline, and after each block which consisted of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) squat, 0 kg static jump (SJ), 0 kg countermovement jump (CMJ), 20 kg SJ, and 20 kg CMJ. Absolute and relative strength were strongly correlated with rates of improvement for absolute strength, relative strength, 0 kg, and 20 kg vertical jumps. All subjects substantially improved back squat (p < 0.001), relative back squat (p < 0.001) with large–very large effect sizes between groups for percent change favoring the weak group over the moderate and strong group for all performance variables. All subjects showed statistically significant improvements in 0 kg SJ (p < 0.001), 0 kg CMJ (p < 0.001), 20 kg SJ (p = 0.002), and 20 kg CMJ (p < 0.001). Statistically significant between group differences were noted for both 20 kg SJ (p = 0.01) and 20 kg CMJ (p = 0.043) with the strong group statistically greater jump heights than the weak group. The results of this study indicate BP training is effective in improving strength and explosive ability. Additionally, training status may substantially alter the response to a resistance training program. MDPI 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7693826/ /pubmed/33142849 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8110145 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wetmore, Alexander B.
Moquin, Paul A.
Carroll, Kevin M.
Fry, Andrew C.
Hornsby, W. Guy
Stone, Michael H.
The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training
title The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training
title_full The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training
title_fullStr The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training
title_short The Effect of Training Status on Adaptations to 11 Weeks of Block Periodization Training
title_sort effect of training status on adaptations to 11 weeks of block periodization training
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33142849
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8110145
work_keys_str_mv AT wetmorealexanderb theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT moquinpaula theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT carrollkevinm theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT fryandrewc theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT hornsbywguy theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT stonemichaelh theeffectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT wetmorealexanderb effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT moquinpaula effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT carrollkevinm effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT fryandrewc effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT hornsbywguy effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining
AT stonemichaelh effectoftrainingstatusonadaptationsto11weeksofblockperiodizationtraining