Cargando…

Biomimetic vs. Direct Approach to Deposit Hydroxyapatite on the Surface of Low Melting Point Polymers for Tissue Engineering

Polymers are widely used in many applications in the field of biomedical engineering. Among eclectic selections of polymers, those with low melting temperature (T(m) < 200 °C), such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), or polyethylene, are often used in bone, dental, maxil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riau, Andri K., Venkatraman, Subbu S., Mehta, Jodhbir S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33138141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10112162
_version_ 1783614859051532288
author Riau, Andri K.
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
author_facet Riau, Andri K.
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
author_sort Riau, Andri K.
collection PubMed
description Polymers are widely used in many applications in the field of biomedical engineering. Among eclectic selections of polymers, those with low melting temperature (T(m) < 200 °C), such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), or polyethylene, are often used in bone, dental, maxillofacial, and corneal tissue engineering as substrates or scaffolds. These polymers, however, are bioinert, have a lack of reactive surface functional groups, and have poor wettability, affecting their ability to promote cellular functions and biointegration with the surrounding tissue. Improving the biointegration can be achieved by depositing hydroxyapatite (HAp) on the polymeric substrates. Conventional thermal spray and vapor phase coating, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved plasma spray technique, is not suitable for application on the low T(m) polymers due to the high processing temperature, reaching more than 1000 °C. Two non-thermal HAp coating approaches have been described in the literature, namely, the biomimetic deposition and direct nanoparticle immobilization techniques. In the current review, we elaborate on the unique features of each technique, followed by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique to help readers decide on which method is more suitable for their intended applications. Finally, the future perspectives of the non-thermal HAp coating are given in the conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7693928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76939282020-11-28 Biomimetic vs. Direct Approach to Deposit Hydroxyapatite on the Surface of Low Melting Point Polymers for Tissue Engineering Riau, Andri K. Venkatraman, Subbu S. Mehta, Jodhbir S. Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Polymers are widely used in many applications in the field of biomedical engineering. Among eclectic selections of polymers, those with low melting temperature (T(m) < 200 °C), such as poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), or polyethylene, are often used in bone, dental, maxillofacial, and corneal tissue engineering as substrates or scaffolds. These polymers, however, are bioinert, have a lack of reactive surface functional groups, and have poor wettability, affecting their ability to promote cellular functions and biointegration with the surrounding tissue. Improving the biointegration can be achieved by depositing hydroxyapatite (HAp) on the polymeric substrates. Conventional thermal spray and vapor phase coating, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved plasma spray technique, is not suitable for application on the low T(m) polymers due to the high processing temperature, reaching more than 1000 °C. Two non-thermal HAp coating approaches have been described in the literature, namely, the biomimetic deposition and direct nanoparticle immobilization techniques. In the current review, we elaborate on the unique features of each technique, followed by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique to help readers decide on which method is more suitable for their intended applications. Finally, the future perspectives of the non-thermal HAp coating are given in the conclusion. MDPI 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7693928/ /pubmed/33138141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10112162 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Riau, Andri K.
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
Mehta, Jodhbir S.
Biomimetic vs. Direct Approach to Deposit Hydroxyapatite on the Surface of Low Melting Point Polymers for Tissue Engineering
title Biomimetic vs. Direct Approach to Deposit Hydroxyapatite on the Surface of Low Melting Point Polymers for Tissue Engineering
title_full Biomimetic vs. Direct Approach to Deposit Hydroxyapatite on the Surface of Low Melting Point Polymers for Tissue Engineering
title_fullStr Biomimetic vs. Direct Approach to Deposit Hydroxyapatite on the Surface of Low Melting Point Polymers for Tissue Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Biomimetic vs. Direct Approach to Deposit Hydroxyapatite on the Surface of Low Melting Point Polymers for Tissue Engineering
title_short Biomimetic vs. Direct Approach to Deposit Hydroxyapatite on the Surface of Low Melting Point Polymers for Tissue Engineering
title_sort biomimetic vs. direct approach to deposit hydroxyapatite on the surface of low melting point polymers for tissue engineering
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7693928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33138141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10112162
work_keys_str_mv AT riauandrik biomimeticvsdirectapproachtodeposithydroxyapatiteonthesurfaceoflowmeltingpointpolymersfortissueengineering
AT venkatramansubbus biomimeticvsdirectapproachtodeposithydroxyapatiteonthesurfaceoflowmeltingpointpolymersfortissueengineering
AT mehtajodhbirs biomimeticvsdirectapproachtodeposithydroxyapatiteonthesurfaceoflowmeltingpointpolymersfortissueengineering