Cargando…

Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials

BACKGROUND: Process evaluations are an important component of an effectiveness evaluation as they focus on understanding the relationship between interventions and context to explain how and why interventions work or fail, and whether they can be transferred to other settings and populations. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Aileen, Bugge, Carol, Wells, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33246496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04880-4
_version_ 1783614948092411904
author Grant, Aileen
Bugge, Carol
Wells, Mary
author_facet Grant, Aileen
Bugge, Carol
Wells, Mary
author_sort Grant, Aileen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Process evaluations are an important component of an effectiveness evaluation as they focus on understanding the relationship between interventions and context to explain how and why interventions work or fail, and whether they can be transferred to other settings and populations. However, historically, context has not been sufficiently explored and reported resulting in the poor uptake of trial results. Therefore, suitable methodologies are needed to guide the investigation of context. Case study is one appropriate methodology, but there is little guidance about what case study design can offer the study of context in trials. We address this gap in the literature by presenting a number of important considerations for process evaluation using a case study design. MAIN TEXT: In this paper, we define context, the relationship between complex interventions and context, and describe case study design methodology. A well-designed process evaluation using case study should consider the following core components: the purpose; definition of the intervention; the trial design, the case, the theories or logic models underpinning the intervention, the sampling approach and the conceptual or theoretical framework. We describe each of these in detail and highlight with examples from recently published process evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of approaches to process evaluation design in the literature; however, there is a paucity of research on what case study design can offer process evaluations. We argue that case study is one of the best research designs to underpin process evaluations, to capture the dynamic and complex relationship between intervention and context during implementation. We provide a comprehensive overview of the issues for process evaluation design to consider when using a case study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DQIP - ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01425502 - OPAL - ISRCTN57746448
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7694311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76943112020-11-30 Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials Grant, Aileen Bugge, Carol Wells, Mary Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: Process evaluations are an important component of an effectiveness evaluation as they focus on understanding the relationship between interventions and context to explain how and why interventions work or fail, and whether they can be transferred to other settings and populations. However, historically, context has not been sufficiently explored and reported resulting in the poor uptake of trial results. Therefore, suitable methodologies are needed to guide the investigation of context. Case study is one appropriate methodology, but there is little guidance about what case study design can offer the study of context in trials. We address this gap in the literature by presenting a number of important considerations for process evaluation using a case study design. MAIN TEXT: In this paper, we define context, the relationship between complex interventions and context, and describe case study design methodology. A well-designed process evaluation using case study should consider the following core components: the purpose; definition of the intervention; the trial design, the case, the theories or logic models underpinning the intervention, the sampling approach and the conceptual or theoretical framework. We describe each of these in detail and highlight with examples from recently published process evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of approaches to process evaluation design in the literature; however, there is a paucity of research on what case study design can offer process evaluations. We argue that case study is one of the best research designs to underpin process evaluations, to capture the dynamic and complex relationship between intervention and context during implementation. We provide a comprehensive overview of the issues for process evaluation design to consider when using a case study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DQIP - ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01425502 - OPAL - ISRCTN57746448 BioMed Central 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7694311/ /pubmed/33246496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04880-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Grant, Aileen
Bugge, Carol
Wells, Mary
Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials
title Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials
title_full Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials
title_fullStr Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials
title_full_unstemmed Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials
title_short Designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials
title_sort designing process evaluations using case study to explore the context of complex interventions evaluated in trials
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33246496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04880-4
work_keys_str_mv AT grantaileen designingprocessevaluationsusingcasestudytoexplorethecontextofcomplexinterventionsevaluatedintrials
AT buggecarol designingprocessevaluationsusingcasestudytoexplorethecontextofcomplexinterventionsevaluatedintrials
AT wellsmary designingprocessevaluationsusingcasestudytoexplorethecontextofcomplexinterventionsevaluatedintrials